Five Faves: 80s Science Fiction Movies

The 80s were great.[note]They were also damn terrible. The horrible treatment of LGBTQ+ people, the AIDs crisis, Reagan, the Cold War, Reagan, and so on and so forth. I just like the art...[/note] Great music. Great movies. Great books. Great fashion. Yeah, I said it. Fashion. I love 80s fashion, and I don't care what you think about that! Anywho. For today's Five Faves post, I thought I'd take a stab at listing 80s science fiction movies. I know that the second I click the publish button on this post, I'm going to change my mind about the movies selected below. Oh well... Here goes: Read More

Star Trek: a Worf TV Show? (Some Thoughts)

A few weeks ago, the Huffington Post released an interview with Wil Wheaton and Michael Dorn, who played Wesley Crusher and Worf (respectively) on Star Trek:  the Next Generation.  I recommend reading the whole thing, but for now, I'm only concerned with one quote from Dorn:
Business things got in the way in terms of the JJ Abrams movie coming out and CBS/Paramount and their relationship with JJ Abrams. I don't think they wanted to step on his toes by putting a new series on, but it's not dead yet. I've finished the script and hopefully someone will take a look at this and say "we can do this."
Basically, we're not that far off from seeing a Captain Worf TV show.  Let me say that again:  a Captain Worf TV show.  By "not far off," of course, I don't mean "next year."  This is Hollywood, after all, and even getting into talks with the studios still means you're about as far from production as we are from going to Mars.  Still, in production terms, that's a lot closer than "I've got the rights" or "I wrote something" or "someone answered my phone call."  In other words, yeah, we're really not that far off from a possible show.

The big questions are these:

How exactly are they going to fit this show into the universe everyone now knows (Abrams')?  And if they're not going to integrate Worf into this new universe, how can they justify the character to a new viewing public?
First, there are big problems with sticking Worf into the Abrams universe.  Even taking into account the ridiculous time travel changes that have occurred, the character of Worf doesn't appear until well after the events of the first two ST films.  He's from an entirely different era, and his character is so defined by that era that to try to artificially shove him 100 years forward would entail an entirely different set of political conditions, most notably the fact that the Federation and the Klingons haven't even begun their war in the Abrams universe.  Star Trek Into Darkness takes place in 2259 -- eight years before the Federation-Klingon war took place in the original universe.  And the film makes clear that war is pretty much inevitable, as it was in the original universe.  Since Worf's character is partly defined by the post-war period, after which the Klingons eventually sue for piece (as in The Undiscovered Country), it doesn't make much sense to shove him into the immediate universe of the Abrams film.  That said, I wouldn't be surprised if they did just that, since this film series seems incapable of inventing new characters; instead, they borrow liberally from everything that came before.

One of the other problems has to do with which ST TV shows people are most likely to remember.  The Abrams ST films are probably more popular with casual or non-Trek viewers than with the traditional Trekkie crowd.  As such, its primary audience likely knows about TOS, TNG, DS9, and Voyager, but their most recent ST experience would have been with Enterprise.  The good news:  STE doesn't violate Abrams' new canon, since its events, more or less, take place before Kirk's birth (in fairness, I haven't finished STE yet, so there may be stuff in there that contradicts this).  You could easily suck STE into Abrams' canon without much problems, which is not something you can easily do with a Worf TV show which springs off of TNG and DS9 (as the title, Captain Worf, suggests).
A show set in the Next Gen universe will also have a hard time competing with the film universe precisely because its characters aren't the dominant representation of ST anymore.  They may be some of the most recognizable non-TOS characters in the ST canon, but the universe we're playing in now would, by its very nature, have to diverge significantly from the world we learned about in TNG.  After all, the Vulcans aren't really there to help out anymore.  They're a decimated species who might, in 100 years, get some semblance of interstellar control back, but they're basically out for the count right now.  And that means Abrams has to take into account that the Klingons will likely have more of an influence on the Federation than they would have had before -- they're minus one formidable opponent.

Right.  Wandering.  This is the problem.  The Abrams universe has become, in my mind, *the* ST universe.  It's the one we're all really talking about as a culture.  As much as I want a Captain Worf show set in the TNG universe, I worry that it will only confuse new fans of ST.  After all, part of the reason the new ST movies are so action oriented is to snatch up younger viewers.  It's not designed for Trekkies, as much as they might hate the idea.  And the worst thing you can do to a newer, younger (and, hey, possibly older-but-never-been-into-ST-before) crowd is confuse them with ST stuff that doesn't fit.  Well, maybe not the worst thing, but it's a legitimate concern.
But who am I to say it won't work?  I'll watch the show regardless, as will most Trek fans.  Worf is a beloved character, and watching him grow as a formidable captain would be pretty awesome.

Bogh tlhInganpu', SuvwI'pu' moj, Hegh!