The “True Fan” Argument of Stupidness (or, Could We Stop This Nonsense Now?)

Reading Time

As a giant Star Wars fan, it is inevitable that I’ll come into contact with people claiming to know what a “true fan” looks like. In the last year, that argument has become more prominent than ever. In the wake of The Force Awakens, hundreds of people flocked to the Star Wars franchise to declare themselves fans. And old school Star Wars fandom wasn’t happy. Those new folks didn’t understand Star Wars. They didn’t really love it; they were just in it for the exciting new ride. They were just half-assed fake fans.

None of this is particularly new to the fan world. People have been calling other people out for being fake fans longer than I’ve been alive.1 But as an argument, the “true fan” reasoning is, at best, bullshit.

There are a couple reasons for this:

  • The definition of fan doesn’t need to match to your personal method of engagement.
  • Creating a limiting definition of “fan” is fundamentally exclusionary and selfish.

To the first of these:  the definition of fandom is and should be as varied as possible. I have no business telling someone they are not a real fan of something simply because they don’t engage as I do. Someone can be a Star Wars fan and only pay attention to the movies. You can be a Star Wars fan and dress up as the characters OR spend hours reading about the expanded universe OR writing your own fan fiction (slash or otherwise). You can be a Star Wars fan and only love The Force Awakens (or Rogue One). Hell, you don’t even have to agree on which Star Wars movies are the best or whether Han shot first.2

There just isn’t such a thing as “true fan.” There are just fans. And that’s a good thing.

To the second:  Part of the reason the “true fan” debate occurs is as a mechanism of exclusion. When someone says “you aren’t a real fan,” they’re doing so as a way to universalize their own method of engagement. It’s akin to calling someone a liar because they disagree. And all too often, this argument is used to exclude women and people of color, especially when these groups lodge criticism against a fan property.

As a fan of many things, I can understand the feelings that go along with fandom. It’s easy to become defensive of your favorite fan property, to want to defend it from criticism. But it’s also necessary to be open to the reality that nothing is perfect, and even criticism that hurts can help us make things better. The lack of diversity in Star Wars, for example, is slowly being rectified in the new films, in no small part because a whole lot of fans of sf/f at large have helped shape the discourse on diversity so that even Hollywood cannot completely ignore it.3 These are good things. Fandom should be open to everyone, and making the franchise itself more open makes it a lot easier for different people to find their own place within a created world. Ghostbusters did something very similar, and the adorable pictures of little girls dressed up as the movie characters was a wonderful reminder of how important representation is.

I also think that the more diverse a fandom is, the more healthy it is. It opens up the door to new methods of engaging and to new ideas for expanding. I mean “diverse” in the loosest sense (diverse types, diverse peoples, diverse engagements). Fandoms cannot survive by pushing people away; they survive by finding ways to include more people and by recognizing and validating different types of fans. After all, most of the major sf/f fandoms will eventually be made up entirely of people who weren’t alive when the original creator was around, and keeping business “as is” will likely have the effect of pushing younger fans away. We see this over and over in general sf/f fandom, with younger fans moving away from literary conventions to more media-centered conventions. The only way to correct this is to find new ways of connecting different types of fans.

Get people talking to one another. Get people to hear one another. Empathy, in other words, goes a long way.

What all this comes down to is quite simple:  the “true fan” argument needs to die. Where it arises, it should be called out for what it is:  exclusionary and divisive. Instead, we should aim for a better fandom, one that is as inclusive as possible and self-correcting.

the-force-awakens
The Force Awakens: bringing us new fans since 2015!

We just need to figure out how to do that…

Footnotes

  1. Hell, the term “trufan” dates back to 1954, though it probably appeared much sooner than that.
  2. For the sake of argument:  Han shot first. The Special Editions are Hollywood propaganda designed to lure us into a false sense of security so we can be easily abducted and experimented on by aliens.
  3. The whitewashing of Doctor Strange, however, tells us that we’ve still got a long way to go.
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

3 Responses

  1. I get what you’re saying, but it’s annoying when the same people who made fun of you for being a fan now act like they’ve always been the biggest fan. And when they get called out, they say, “well, I’m not a dork about it.” Yes, I love when people still try to find a way to make fun of you for something they claim to like with the”you’re too into it”argument.

  2. The very second you made it about race ot sex the very second you lost your argument. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT YOU MASSIVE TURD. People are assholes about theor fandoms because they want to feel superior about their intellect and dedication to the topic at hand. Injecting racism or sexism where it does not belong destroys your entire argument.

    1. Please elaborate with receipts and mostly correct spelling and grammar. How does bringing up race and gender in regards to a fandom which is overwhelmingly white male and which has frequently complained about diversity suddenly invalidate one minute part of my much larger argument? I’ll wait.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »