Critique Groups…part two…

Reading Time

First things first: Thanks to everyone who has posted such nice comments about WISB. I really do appreciate them. There’s really nothing that can make a writer feel better than to know he or she has fans, regardless of the medium. Just knowing that there area few of you out there that are completely hooked is enough to make me giggle with joy inside. So, thank you very much. I appreciate all comments on all subjects, but those few on the chapters and such really hit home.

Next: I’ve sold five of my books from my little Amazon ‘get rid of old books’ thing. As of now I haven’t put up anything that wasn’t related to school at some point, but I’m thinking of trying to sell off my R. L. Stine collection on there, perhaps. I don’t know yet.

Now, as I mentioned earlier, I am going to do part two of this critique groups thing.

I want to start a critique group. Nothing big, nothing super or amazing like the Inklings (you know, Tolkien’s little group with C.S. Lewis and what not). I would just like to have a small group of say 3 or 4 people who all write and read in the same general genre (so SF/F and maybe some more fantastical H provided it’s like really wicked stuff and not your typical crazy guy with the knife thing). The number is of course extremely flexible.

So, first, would anyone be interested in such a thing?Now, here is some more things on this idea. First, I can’t provide or critique stuff every week simply because I work full time and go to college full time right now. I think doing once a month would be sufficient enough in my opinion.
Also there are two ways I’d like to try to do such a group. One is by mail, which I understand pretty much nobody is going to go for, for very obvious reasons. My reasoning for liking the mail idea is that I critique and work a million times better by hand. Plus, I like seeing my work with red pen marks on it…I dunno why, but makes me happy or something. I’m sadistic, I know.
The other way was to use Critique Circle and create a small group through it. I don’t know at this moment if it costs anything to do such a thing, and if so I can likely just cover it if it’s not excessive in cost–but donations…*wink wink*…would be most welcome. I like CC as I said before because of the in-line critique form.

So, who’s interested?

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

5 Responses

  1. If CC turns out to need payment and everyone’s to *ahem* cheap to donate, I can recommend http://www.fmwriters.com as a good place to start one up. I did so about a year ago and while there were a few teething problems, and a lot of people dropped out, we’re now down to four of us who are serious about the whole thing. The group can be made private so only members can view it and you can make up your own rules. It’s worked well for us!

  2. Cool, thanks for the link.

    For a full one year membership so that I can start up a ‘queue’ as they call it (which basically is just a personal queue list of work from either just you or others in the group too) it is $34. So, that’s not really that much money when you think about it.
    But, I’ll check out FMWriters for the time being and see if that will work too.

  3. I can suggest and, if need be, ‘Host’ an online critique group so there would be no fundemental costs to anyone joining, but then its number would have to be monitored so that it didn’t grow too large, also, I’d even offer the odd critique and other help, if You are willing to be the Moderator?

    People could post a chapter and or short story (one a month maybe?) and you would have to do two critiques of other peoples work as compensation. That way everyone wins.

    Have a think about it.

  4. Well technically I would be ‘hosting’ a group, just not hosting a website for it. CC or FMwriters would be doing that depending on what people would want more. This is also why I want a small group of maybe 4 people at most. I want it to be where there is no ‘obligation’ to write a certain number of critiques to get your work looked at. Rather I want the group to allow everyone to get a read by all other group members, and having a large group makes that near impossible in my opinion. Small groups are better at writing crits for a small number of works. But that’s just sort of what I was looking for. I’m leaning towards CC just because I love their system so much, but don’t know if there will be a few people joining up or not, so yeah.

  5. I’ll join, especially if it was done at CC. Likewise, I probably wouldn’t be able to critique something every single week, but they’d get done.

    I like the small group idea as well, as opposed to a alrge group. It would be a lot easier to keep track of who’s posted stuff recently, not to mention it would mean a lot less critiques that need to get done.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »