June 2008

World in the Satin Bag

An Update: SoD WIll Resume

I know there are some of you expecting more of The Spellweaver of Dern; you’ll be happy to know that I have every intention of continuing with the expansion, creation, and propagation of my fantasy world. When do you say?Well, I think we’re due for a little discussion on that. Firstly, I have to say that I am somewhat ill from the lack of writing over the last few months. The situation has been explained ad nauseum–school was killing me, literally–and so I won’t go into any detail with it. School, however, is almost over. How much time is left? Thursday, June 12th, 2008 at 4 PM. That’s when my last essay is due. Then the quarter will be, for all intensive purposes, over. I may or may not take a course over summer, a matter which will be heavily discussed with myself and likely with my girlfriend, who will no doubt have objections to such a conception.That said, everything will be falling back into place. Effective Friday, June 13th, 2008 at whenever I wake up (likely 8:13 AM), all of the following prior personal goals will resume: Write 2,000 words a day or more. Read 100 pages a day or more. Edit two short stories or two novel chapters a month. Submit at least one story a month, preferably more. I expect that the next chapter in SoD will be up the week after next (which would not be the week starting tomorrow for those of us still on the 8th). I intend to write the chapter I have and drive forward with it. Hopefully I don’t stick my food in my mouth. I also think I am going to attempt a rough drawing of a new continent to be put up for your perusal. We’ll see.So that is what I am promising to do, or at least that is what I’m promising myself to do. Yeah!

World in the Satin Bag

Confused About Journalism

Forgive me if I rant out of pure ignorance, but I came across an article on Jeff Vandermeer’s blog that has me a bit baffled. First, my assumption is that journalism, by and large, is about telling stories. Not fictional ones, but real ones in a way to convey information that paints, at least to some extent, a picture of what really happened. When journalists talk about literature, it tends to be a little different: usually you might consider them to be like semi-critics of the literary genre in the sense that they make insightful investigations into aspects of literature (even when they are idiotic investigations). So, when someone writes an article about some aspect of literature I expect to see not only some sort of presentation of the facts in a semi-story form, but some intelligent conversation on whatever it is the journalist is writing about. But then I saw this article and I am completely and utterly confused. It’s about constructed languages within fiction (primarily SF and F). While I appreciate that the author (one Karen Sandstrom) has laid out the information very clearly, I find it baffling why this article fails to do anything remotely journalistic. It’s not attempting to paint a picture of any sort, even a boringly historical one, nor is it attempting to make any sort of attempt to engage the material behind simply pointing out what most of us probably know already (yes, we know that Tolkien wrote his own bloody languages for his books). All of us who have read Lewis Carol’s work are aware that he made up a lot of words, some of which are in common language. So instead of trying to give us an interesting article about the subject, Sandstrom has done what Wikipedia is incapable of doing: laid out the information in plain sight to be read like information tablets or little High School index cards. I don’t get it. I have looked and reread the entire thing four times over in the last ten minutes trying to understand what it is Sandstrom is trying to do. I thought maybe I had missed a moment where it declared that her article is nothing more than a quick response to some other article, perhaps in the same vein as a Letter to the Editor. But I see no such signs. The article is pointless. Is there something I’m missing? Has journalism changed so drastically? Or is this just one lame article that happens to be on an interesting subject, but fails to do anything interesting with it?

World in the Satin Bag

RIP: Algis Budrys

I just heard from SF Signal that science fiction author Algis Budrys has passed on. I have yet to read his work, but he will be missed nonetheless! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this).

World in the Satin Bag

SBS Magazine: Submissions Open

I don’t know why I haven’t talked about this. As many of you know I am co-owner of a website called Young Writers Online, or YWO. YWO is, basically, a site for writers of varying ages (generally those under 25). The site has been doing remarkably well, in my opinion. We’re growing steadily, expanding, and revamping.That being said, when my friend Andrew and I created the site we set out with high hopes. Why? Well, because we wanted to have a really great site for young writers of all ages to go to not only find a supportive community, but a place where they could receive constructive critiques on their work from people the same age. And YWO has delivered such a place.But YWO is going to a place not a lot of sites have gone before, at least not successfully. And we’re taking it very seriously.I give you Survival By Storytelling Magazine (or SBS Magazine for short). Anything and everything you need to know about submission guidelines can be found here (these will eventually be moving once we upgrade YWO and add a new page specifically for magazine things). There is also a discussion thread here where you can post questions, comments, etc. (you have to be a member, obviously). The magazine will publish fiction, poetry, and small one act plays by writers of various ages in any genre. There will be some contests held in the near future as well (two or three of them, actually).Feel free to spread the news about this! I look forward to seeing submissions from our members too! And if you’d like to join YWO, we ‘d be glad to have you! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

A Little Time Travel Goes a Long Way (Or Something Like That)

If Philip K. Dick had failed to represent the true confusion of hallucinogenic drugs and the reality/unreality dichotomy in any of his other works, those very ideas are firmly planted within Lies, Inc. Not only is there direct mention of an LSD trip—and it should be noted that it is forced upon Applebaum, rather than being a choice—but the novel lends itself to utter confusion by presenting a narrative structure that folds in upon itself like a confusing time paradox. Perhaps looking at the Terminator films and trying to contemplate—without having one’s head explode—the endless time dilation created by the father of John Conner somehow managing to go back in time and take part in the conception of the “hero of Mankind” would give us some understanding of the confusing and illusive nature of this novel. How exactly can Applebaum exist in Terran space—on his ship, the Omphalos—and yet still manage to take a Telpor trip across light-years of empty space to Whale’s Mouth? The confusing part is that the idea of time travel is so vaguely represented that the audience is left wondering that very question without a true answer. Unlike the Terminator films, the book doesn’t hinge on the time travel idea; time travel is all but nonexistent, with a single mention of a device given to Applebaum that vaguely refers to time, but is never made exactly clear. In fact, Applebaum cuts off the UN official before said official can finish his sentence—“It’s a time-warping construct that sets up a field which coagulates the…” (193). We’re left to wonder what that exactly means. How does it warp time? To warp something can mean a variety of things. Shall we go through the different connotations? I think so: Firstly it can mean to bend or twist time out of shape. If we think of time as a flat line, this would mean bending it so it becomes a curve. But what does this mean for time? I haven’t a clue. This is all theoretical—the idea of bending time, or, for that matter, dealing with time in any other way than its linear form is simply unapproachable for someone, like myself, who lacks the scientific knowledge as those who make a living researching such things. Then there is the idea of bending or turning time from its natural or true direction. This might make more sense, since, in theory, Applebaum is existing in two places at once, but the prior place (which happens while he is out in space on the Omphalos) is the true timeline ending where his return to Terra (Earth) involves his manipulating time to somehow prevent Holm from getting caught up in the lie that is Whale’s Mouth—that it’s a peaceful, loving place that everyone wants to go to, a theme very close to Dick (false advertisement). But by looking at it this way also means we’re left with a blindingly confusing paradox. We know by the end of the novel that everything he has done while fiddling with time results in absolutely nothing changing (except that he somehow gets stuck on Whale’s Mouth with a strange condition that gives him permanent hallucinations). But, wouldn’t Applebaum, in theory, become aware of the fact that he is on Whale’s Mouth? Or is that information hidden? This is probably why time travel novels these days are generally avoided. The confusion created by trying to contemplate how it could possible work without completely discombobulating the framework of linear time is generally too much. After all, how are we supposed to apply logic to the cyclical argument in the Terminator universe? The last way of seeing time is not all that different from the second, except it touches upon the idea of the real and the unreal in relation to the truth. If time can be distorted from the truth, if it can be manipulated in such a way that it no longer represents our understanding of what it is, then it also ceases to exist altogether. Time is constant. Einstein made it clear that we can’t fiddle with it. Time is always moving at the same speed, always moving forward. For one to actually make time no longer itself would be breaking boundaries, much like in the novel. Applebaum is in two places at once, except he’s not. The one going to Whale’s Mouth is a future Applebaum going back in time, while the one on the Omphalos is the present Applebaum, who falls off the map for a short while as we learn about the exploits of Future Applebaum. This is a problem because it simply goes against the truth of things. Future Applebaum isn’t exactly unknown to the folks of Whale’s Mouth, or the Hoffman folks either. In fact, they are well aware that he is going to Whale’s Mouth to stir things up. Yet they also are fully aware that he is supposed to be on the Omphalos. Trying to think about this is simply staggering. He’s in two places at once, manipulating time in one existence while being unaware of it in another, or seemingly unaware. This is why very few people argue with the inherent problem of the Terminator Paradox. To do so spells certain mental breakdown. Perhaps this is why man created religion: it’s a way of forgetting that we don’t know anything at all about the universe and by creating a God that simply exists we don’t, in theory, have to make the inference that there has to have been something that created God, the Universe, and Everything. Certainly the number forty-two fills this same void. Moving beyond the time paradox we get an even stranger taste of reality. Applebaum’s LSD-induced psychotic hallucinations bring out the question of whether or not his trip (no pun intended) was real at all. If his influence there was nonexistent to the Present Applebaum, then it might be possible to assume that he may never have gone there at all. The Telpor could very

Scroll to Top