Hugo Awards: The Results
Well, it’s over and I’m late with this (sorry). The winners of each category are: Best Novel: The Yiddish Policemen’s Union by Michael Chabon (HarperCollins; Fourth Estate) Best Novella: “All Seated on the Ground” by Connie Willis (Asimov’s Dec. 2007; Subterranean Press) Best Novelette: “The Merchant and the Alchemist’s Gate” by Ted Chiang (Subterranean Press; F&SF Sept. 2007) Best Short Story: “Tideline” by Elizabeth Bear (Asimov’s June 2007) Best Related Book: Brave New Words: The Oxford Dictionary of Science Fiction by Jeff Prucher (Oxford University Press) Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form: Stardust Written by Jane Goldman and Matthew Vaughn, Based on the novel by Neil Gaiman Illustrated by Charles Vess Directed by Matthew Vaughn (Paramount Pictures) Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form: Doctor Who “Blink” Written by Steven Moffat Directed by Hettie Macdonald (BBC) Best Editor, Long Form: David G. Hartwell Best Editor, Short Form: Gordon Van Gelder Best Professional Artist: Stephan Martiniere Best Semiprozine: Locus Best Fanzine: File 770 Best Fan Writer: John Scalzi Best Fan Artist: Brad Foster I’ll be honest, I expect Chabon’s book to win, even though I haven’t read it yet. I didn’t say that, but I figured that considering how well it has done thus far and considering its content and general appeal, it had a darn good shot. Still, it was up against some good competition (such as Robert J. Sawyer’s Rollback and books by three of the greatest writers currently out there–John Scalzi, Ian McDonald, and Charles Stross). In any case, congratulations to the winners! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
Rejection: Artemis
Alright! Another rejection. Exciting, eh? This time from Strange Horizons. It was a good rejection, meaning that they had nice comments to say (they liked the pacing and action, but it didn’t work for them overall), so I’m thankful of that. “Artemis” has actually received some praise, just not enough praise for it to get snatched up by an editor for publication. So…maybe I’ll send this to a contest or something. Hmmm… Anywho! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
What does your browsing history say about you?
Apparently my browsing has this to say: Likelihood of you being FEMALE is 89%Likelihood of you being MALE is 11% Site Male-Female Ratiogoogle.com 0.98yahoo.com 0.9youtube.com 1amazon.com 0.9craigslist.org 1.13facebook.com 0.83paypal.com 1.04blogger.com 1.06imdb.com 1.06wordpress.com 0.98ticketmaster.com 0.79typepad.com 0.94fandango.com 0.82priceline.com 0.82hotels.com 0.8cafepress.com 0.8vistaprint.com 0.53greyhound.com 0.72wrongdiagnosis.com 0.68usairways.com 0.8feedburner.com 1.11godaddy.com 1.17alibris.com 0.77bbb.org 0.74zazzle.com 0.75abebooks.com 0.96newyorker.com 1.22bartleby.com 0.92lulu.com 0.96creative.com 1.53live365.com 1.27 Of course, I was born with the proper biological parts to make me male, so this came as a great shocker to me. Apparently I’m mostly a girl. Who knew? I wonder which sites make me girly…it must be that darned New Yorker that did it…