Reading Time

Everyone else is talking about it, so I figure I should throw in my two cents. Firstly, I’m not going to go into the giant rants that others have, because I think the majority of what needs to be said has already been said. If you want in-depth discussion of this, then go here, here, here, or here.
My thoughts on this are as follows: Should we be basing any of our discussions on voting population? I’ve never once voted on the Hugos and never really wanted to (no offense to the writers, I just don’t want to pay to be able to vote for a book). How many people are the same way? Also, in reference to the graph, that doesn’t really cover anything beyond a basic representation of the facts, and leaves out the fact that there aren’t a lot of writers in their twenties or thirties in the first place.
I do believe there is a generation gap, but I think it will be nearly impossible to pin down to an exact percentage or number. There’s no way to be entirely certain that old folks only read old folks and young folks only read young folks. Heck, did anyone consider that a lot of readers might not even know what the hell the Hugos even are? Seriously. I didn’t know what the Hugo and Nebula awards were until I picked up a copy of Ender’s Game and read it on the cover. Even then I just went “oh, it’s an award, cool!” It wasn’t until my early twenties that I knew what the awards were and started to become more involved in the writing world. A lot of people may not even know the Hugos exist. After all, it’s not like the Hugos are on television or on the radio. The only time you hear about them is online or on a book and very rarely in regular conversation with folks.
There are just too many factors in all of this for us to be even remotely capable of pinning down what the generation gap actually is. There probably is a gap, but I don’t know if it’s a significant one. It might be, though. Granted, I don’t know everything and perhaps I’m missing some valuable points on all this. What if the gap is accidental? It’s not like writers advertise their age’s, unless they happen to be very young and it’s needed to boost sales. I read just about everything, regardless of age, but I’m also not the average reader, I suppose.

What do you all think about this? Do you feel there is a big generation gap in SF?

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. Coming from a non-writing professional, I still think back to high school days when we had to read older generations (classics) … Jane Eyre, Shakespeare, Diary of Ann Frank, etc. which typically leads a person to discover their own reading tastes as I like Fantasy & Science Fiction. As I moved on, I've included today's generation along with older authors so I don't think there is a gap. Especially as I continue to read sci-fi blogs where the editors continually reach out in broadening their writing skills by keeping up on all generations of books.

  2. Personally I think it’s not so much a generation gap as a culture gap.

    There are people like me for example who for various reasons rarely go to conventions.

    There are also an awful lot of “little fandoms” these days. I don’t think you can really point to a single science fiction fandom that represents the entire genre any more.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »