Show Review: Dollhouse (Ep. 2)

Reading Time

The second episode of Dollhouse was released last Friday and I have a few thoughts. Firstly, I’m not giving up on the show just yet, but there are certainly some serious things working against it.

Whedon is a brilliant storyteller, there’s no doubt about that, but Dollhouse is suffering from something I’d like to call “sitcom-ism.” The story is developing slowly, at best, and the episodes thus far feel disconnected from one another when, for a show of this type, they should be following a noticeable plot-arc. The first episode was a throw-away, one which Whedon and the producers could toss out there to establish the central idea and let us know what is going on. The problem, however, is that the first episode shouldn’t have been a throw-away. Whatever the FOX folks did to the first episode may have irreparably damaged the Dollhouse franchise.

The second episode probably should have been the first, because what it did was bring in an interesting story that, quite frankly, should have been a part of the whole idea in the first place. What happens when a company that imprints memories gets a glitch in the system and one of it’s “products” goes haywire? Well, the answer to that is more interesting than the questions posed in the first episode; and that is the problem.

Dollhouse, essentially, is suffering from a problem of disconnection, where the episodes have connections that seem forced rather than fluid. Story lines that should be highlighted are given undeserved lesser treatment; the second episode pretty much established the first as a pointless waste of space. Yeah, we got to meet Echo and a couple of important characters, but now the story is conflicted by the disconnection between the Echo story and everything else. Whedon tried to bring them together, but thus far it isn’t working. I want the Alpha story (the rogue doll) to become more important, but as of right now, it isn’t. It’s there to add back story and conflict that isn’t conflict at all.

Perhaps I’m being harsh about Dollhouse, but I feel somewhat cheated at this point by Whedon. Firefly was brilliant: it never failed to highlight the important parts, or the most interesting parts. But Dollhouse isn’t Firefly. It is missing something that Firefly had: charm and cohesiveness.

I’m not ready to give up on it yet, though. I’m hoping that the third episode will resolve some of the problems I see. I know sometimes it can take a while for a good show to come into its own. Perhaps that is what is happening here. To be honest, I think that Dollhouse could have benefited from a two-hour opener, much like Firefly seemed to benefit when seen on DVD. Generally I hate those two-hour deals, but I think it’s possible it would work here.

What thoughts do you have on this? What do you think about Dollhouse?

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

5 Responses

  1. Honestly, I was not impressed by the first episode (my thoughts are here), and thought I’ve recorded the 2nd episode, I’m not sure I’ll ever get around to watching it. There’s just too many things competing for my time. (esp. when I have to finish reading Drood, lol!)

  2. It is noncohesive. Having faults in the programming is it's downfall. People want to believe that Dollhouse is a possibility & the story line is missing elements. We shall see how the rest of the episodes play out. Joss Whedon more recent series haven't had as much impact.

  3. I agree that episode 2 was better then 1. What I felt was missing the most though, was the classic Joss wit. I was hoping for a lot more humor. I’ve seen none so far at all.

  4. I heard that the second episode was actually supposed to be the first episode and they only reason they even got the go ahead was because they made a new ‘pilot’ to precede the original pilot…

    Bummer it’s as obvious as it appears to have been. I still need to watch both.

  5. drey: I think the first episode by itself was okay. It wasn’t great or amazing, but not bad, per se. The second episode is an improvement, but in the overall structure, it doesn’t fit. That’s the problem, I think.

    TruGenius: I’m hoping ep. 3 can save it for me. I’m exceedingly picky about my television. And I mean PICKY. Right now there are only three shows I watch religiously: Family Guy, American Dad, and Battlestar Galactica. One of those is ending, so I’ll be down to two…but no new shows have managed to catch my attention in the last few years and BSG is a relatively new development for me.

    Karabu: I think the wit is gone primarily because Dollhouse is meant to be a more serious show. What wit is there is somewhat dark in nature. We’ll see if it will work in Ep. 3.

    LoopdiLou: Then it should have been the original pilot in the first place. Make it an hour and a half, toss in necessary elements to set the premise, and then get into the damned story. FOX is full of idiots…

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »