Reader Question: Dialogue Tags (Friend or Foe?)

Reading Time

Tsuki (a friend from Young Writers Online) recently asked me whether dialogue tags are good or bad, so I thought I would tackle that question here.

The problem with dialogue tags is that everyone who has been professionally/traditionally published, and has been successful at it, has different opinions on how to properly use dialogue tags. Michael A. Stackpole, for example, often argues (on the Dragon Page and elsewhere) that dialogue tags are pretty much pointless, and that having them in your prose can create unnecessary clutter. Others, such as Stephen King, say that the only dialogue tags you should use are “he said/she said.” There are a myriad of opinions on this subject and none of them are necessarily correct. Much of what matters when it comes to dialogue tags is based on personal style. I very much doubt that readers care whether you use “he said/she said” or no tags at all; the folks who tend to care most about that are writers themselves with particular tastes in how things should be done.

But is there a right way to do it?

The way I’ve come to see dialogue tags is that they’re generally unnecessary. There’s little reason to have “he said/she said” primarily because it should be pretty obvious who is speaking in your prose. If your characters are distinct individuals, and you throw in useful description around your dialogue to help differentiate who is talking, why would you ever need “he said/she said”? We don’t say “he said/she said” in the real world. We just say it.

That being said, if you’re going to use dialogue tags, stick with the standard (“he said/she said”). Anything else is amateur at best (such as “he replied” or “she spat” or he grumbled”). If your character is doing something a certain way, show it to us rather than telling us about it. Dialogue should have a flow to it. I personally have a lot of issues with dialogue, but removing unnecessary dialogue tags helps a great deal.

If you decide to use dialogue tags, keep them simple. Clogging your prose with antiquated terms and pointless descriptive language to make your dialogue seem more interesting will ruin the feel of your story. And that’s a big no-no if you want to keep the attention of your audience.

What about all you readers? What do you do with your dialogue and why?

——————————————-

If you have a question about science fiction, fantasy, writing, or anything related you’d like answered here, whether silly or serious, feel free to send it via email to arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com, tweet it via Twitter to @shaunduke, or leave it in the comments here. Questions are always welcome! If you liked this post, consider stumbling, digging, or linking to it!

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

5 Responses

  1. The only time I believe that dialogue tags are okay to use, albeit unnecessary if everything is clear, is when you have more than two characters speaking at one another. Though, like you said, if the characters have distinct personalities and you use description with the dialogue, then they should rarely be used.

    I am one to use dialogue tags though, and in my later writing, I've been forcing myself not to use too many and add much, much more description with it.

    It doesn't really bother me while reading either. It doesn't affect me if they're there or if they're absent.

    *This is Quietus from YWO, btw*

  2. For me, a non-fiction writer who is now ghost writing my second allegory for a client, it depends – as it so often does.

    So I've got john or jane saids x said emphatically… but used judicially… I think. I read my stuff out loud which helps me hear what my eye misses and if I get confused I know the target reader will… after all I know who is who. If I need a tag I use it.

    You're right, its the mark of an amateur to use them too much, but it's also the mark of an amateur not to use them when they make the passage clear.

  3. Quietus: That's certainly a way to do it. And I know who you are :P.

    The way I see it, though, is that dialogue tags really don't need to be anything more than the basic/standard ones. Readers already tune those out anyway (or at least gloss over them). But there's nothing wrong with "he said/she said," unless you use it for EVERYTHING. You only need it once or twice in dialogue to get your point across. And dialogue should flow.

    Anne: I've never found reading allowed to be useful, but a lot of people do, so it's good advice for any writer to try. Different methods work for different people.

    Thanks for stopping by both of you!

  4. I am a fan of mixing up dialog tags just a little. 95% he/she said, a little bit other. But first I try to avoid using them at all by making the stage business do the work.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »