Crossing Genres: Is Cross Genre SF Killing Science Fiction?

Reading Time

Somewhere in the genre community there is someone blaming the death of science fiction on all those bastards mixing their filthy mysteries and romances with the hardcore awesomeness of SF. I don’t know where they are, but knowing the SF/F community as well as I do, I have no doubt that they exist, frothing at the mouth every time an author like Michael Chabon or Richard Morgan or *insert cross genre author here* tosses out a new, critically acclaimed book. After all, cross genre SF is a terrible amalgam that is systemically tearing down science fiction, piece by piece, right?

Hardly. Cross genre is perhaps the best thing to happen to science fiction since the golden age, at least as far as being an intentional “movement.” What cross genre does is exactly what science fiction needs to convince people that it’s not the same thing it always was, that it’s not the spaceships and explosions and Star Wars/Star Trek rip-offs that too many people have allowed to flood their minds. It’s more than that. It’s complicated narratives involving anything from intense murder mysteries to complex relationships to interstellar battles. Spaceships and explosions may exist, but they are not contingent; they are probably elements of a particular brand of SF, a brand that cross genre circumvents, or, perhaps less negatively, moves around to take the genre in new directions.

SF, ultimately, is better off with these non-traditional narratives injected into it. We need the mixture in SF as much as we need ideas and strong prose, especially if SF expects to survive and continue to be relevant. SF has to be able to move around, to work its way into the cracks of other genres and remind people that it’s there and ready to cause some literary damage.

What do you think of cross genre SF? Do you hate it or think it’s great? Let me know!

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

9 Responses

  1. I don't think it ever actually died. It's like the undead. You can keep shooting the body and burying it, but it will always come back when someone screws with a chemical weapon or an ancient book of death…

  2. Science Fiction will never be dead. There are certain authors that people will always love to read. There will always be novels and series people will read again and again. Crossing genres is a great idea. I think it brings new readers into the genre and will make them want to read more and more pure science fiction. Also vice-veresa. I always think its a good thing just to get people reading new authors and new genres.

  3. Star Wars itself is arguably cross-genre, given the western/samurai/sea-saga/fighter-ace roots of the original movie.

    Of course, Lucas's favorite samurai filmmaker was influenced by westerns.

    Cross-pollination seems inevitable.

  4. Jodi: I agree. Not much to say except that :P.

    Tomag: Cross-pollination doesn't seem inevitable, it is inevitable. To be fair, I don't think cross genre is actually all that new. It's been around since the dawn of SF, we just didn't call it cross genre, or didn't draw attention to it as we are now.

  5. Science fiction is all about crossing genres. You've got sci-fi with romance, military, thriller, detective, and many others. It's not anything new, it's simply being referred to as something new, which is just a reader's way to identify what they like within the vast genre of science fiction.

    Personally I've not seen or heard this mentioned anywhere, so I was a little surprised to read your assumptions about what readers within the genre say when you haven't provided any examples…

  6. Mark: I wasn't blaming readers. I said somewhere out in the SF/F community there is someone throwing a fit. I never said that it applied to the readership as a whole.

  7. I didn't really need evidence. I was making a point. The point wasn't about SF's death or anyone making the claim that cross genre is doing it. The point was that cross genre is good for SF. I wasn't pointing to any particular individual, or any group, just making a general observation.

    If you wanted evidence, I suppose I could go off and point to those who dislike SF mixing with romance, but, again, that wasn't the point of my post.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »