Suspending Disbelief While Writing Fantasy (Harder Than It Sounds)

Reading Time

I may have talked about this before (in passing), but I wanted to bring the subject up again, and in a little more depth. And then I’m going to ask a question.

I’ve been struggling as of late with writing fantasy. While I love the genre, I can’t seem to get past the third or fourth chapter in any fantasy novel I try to write (and from my reading statistics over the last few years, I apparently have read more fantasy than science fiction, as shocking as that may sound). The problem? Every time I start a fantasy idea (mostly in novel form), I end up burning out, not because of the usual (I’m bored of the story or characters), but because I cannot suspend my own disbelief in terms of the “cliches.” I have no problem doing this while reading, though, and this poses a bizarre dilemma.

How exactly can I write in a genre I enjoy if I can’t get past my own nagging guilt that I’m “telling the same story all over again?” Other authors do it (and let’s face it, most of them aren’t writing anything “original” at all, because that’s not really what fantasy is about). I read it. I love it. And I rarely dislike fantasy if the writer can pull off the cliches with grace (meaning they write in a way that makes the cliches irrelevant). I don’t know if that’s my problem. Am I graceless when it comes to fantasy? Maybe. When I write fantasy I get a good twenty or thirty pages into the story (maybe even 50) before I tell myself “I’ve seen this before” and lose interest. No, I’m not consciously trying to copy others (in fact, the novel I was working on for a while, Watchtower, had what I thought was a fairly unique use of old ideas developed outside of fantasy and then shoved into the middle of it for what the genre offered to the story). I may be doing this unconsciously, and, if so, I wonder if that is also a problem all fantasy writers (published or otherwise) deal with on a regular basis.

On the flip side, what makes it easier to suspend disbelief while reading fantasy (again, in terms of the cliches) than while writing it? Is there a switch that needs to be turned on somewhere in my head?

So, I’ll ask those of you who are writers (published or otherwise) what you do, or would suggest I do, to get past this? Is this a normal nagging thing for all writers of fantasy?

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

7 Responses

  1. I wonder if deep down inside, you really just don't like to write in the fantasy genre. I say that because I really don't care for the genre and yet I love SF. So you shouldn't feel like because they are shelved together you must like them both enough to write in both genres.

    I think it's okay to not like to write fantasy. If every story you start seems cliche to you perhaps you really just don't like to write them. You may enjoy reading them, but that does not mean you have to write fantasy stories.

    I enjoy the occasional thriller novel, but I have no intention to write one. Paradoxically, I don't really read many mysteries, yet I write them. Primarily, because there are no mysteries like the ones I write. So I feel like I'm adding something to the genre to make it more appealing to people with my tastes.

  2. This is strange. I'm going to guess it's because when you read a fantasy book, you're completely entrenched in that work and the outside world is blocked out completely, but when you're writing, you're drawing on dozens of outside influences and references to develop this story, and your mind will invariably make connections b/t something you read and something you're writing. When this has happened to me, I go back to what I think my story is like, and find out that it may be obliquely similar, but there is enough difference that I feel comfortable in continuing with the idea. Also, you're bound to have at least one idea in a story that's similar to someone else's, but it gets swallowed up by all the other ideas that are more unique.

  3. Ken: I actually want to write fantasy, I just have problems with it. But, that's something to think about for sure.

    Adam: That's true. You just made me think about my science fiction, though (which you're now reading). Some of it tends to be very…fantastical. Lots of mysticism and what not. I don't know what that means. I love writing that stuff…

  4. I'm going to echo what others have said and say that's not typical. I agree with Ken that you might not enjoy writing fantasy, but I'll also add that maybe part of the issue is your conception of what it means to write fantasy.

    If you think fantasy is not about originality, and even when you're not incorporating fantasy cliches, you still use "old ideas developed outside of fantasy" – it seems to me that for you, writing fantasy = re-writing old ideas, in some shape or form (I don't mean all fantasy is original, just that you seem to feel that unoriginality is a fantasy requirement). So it's not too surprising that you'd feel it was cliched and lose interest.

    But if what you really want is to write trope-y fantasy, I'd make sure the world is built just the way you really want it (which may mean a more sci-fi-ish setting, even) and your characters are acting rationally/honestly. That should help make the story its own thing, even if it's retreading old plots.

  5. Intertribal: I don't think any fiction is about originality. The very notion that you can be "original" is an impossibility.

    The whole "old ideas outside of fantasy" thing is secret code for "I'm basing a story off of the lyrics for a song." Writing in general, for me, is re-writing old ideas. I may do it in a fun or slightly different way, but it's always retelling something already been told in some form or another.

    And no, I don't feel that un-originality is a requirement of fantasy. It's simply an inevitability of all fiction. I just want to write a fantasy. That's it. I don't care what kind. My problem isn't that I don't want to write it. My problem is that when I do, I get to a point where I can't get past my own problem with retelling the same stories, and this is not a problem with any other genre I write it.

  6. I guess it depends on whether or not your focus is on writing a fantasy novel, or writing a story that just happens to be in a fantasy world…do you find you focus in on your characters and the plot first, or do you get bogged down in the world building? I realise you need to focus on both, but maybe tackling the characters and plot first, and then letting the world build around that? … Is that useful?

  7. Paul: I think when I try to write fantasy (novels) I tend to focus on the plot on a basic level first (and then insert characters into the mix). I have to have some idea of what is to happen, so plot is certainly there. I don't spend a lot of time world building. I like world building, but I find it to be tedious and a waste of time if it prevents you from actually writing. But, when I get free time, I do like to draw maps and name places and all that fun stuff.

    So…it's not exactly useful, no :P, only because I don't do what you feel is a negative anyway :P.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »