February 2010

World in the Satin Bag

The Cyborg Returns: Regular Programming and a Musical

I have finally settled back in from my trip to the SWTXPCA conference. If you’ve been following along, you’ll know that I had a blast at the conference and expect I will attend it again in the future. There’s one more post about the SWTXPCA coming, by the way. Having returned, I will be resuming regular programming here at WISB. I have no idea what that will mean, but I assure you there will be a post about my existential crisis brought on by Star Wars and some other curious things. Perhaps the most important and interesting bit of news, however, is that I have begun work on an urban fantasy musical comedy tentatively titled “The Last Temptation of Susan B.” The main character, Susan B., lives in a world dominated by fantastic creatures and people with fantastic powers, but has no such fantastic elements herself. She’s essentially useless. So far, I can only provide sparse details about the narrative (since that’s all I have at this point). The musical will contain: –A vampiric Texan named Ted–A shirtless, muscular werewolf name Pistachio–A song cleverly titled “Fang Envy”–A talking goose named Colonel Gander More details will come as I come up with them. You’re welcome to leave a comment with your opinions. Now, having said all of the above, I think it’s time to get back to normalcy. Cyborg out…or something less dorky…

World in the Satin Bag

The SWTXPCA Conference: Day Two (Conference Day Three)(Updated)

The second day at the SWTXPCA proved to be one hell of a long day. I’m going to split it all up by sections, since a lot happened. PanelsAnother big day for panels; I spent most of the day visiting the science fiction folks, rather than doing what a true academic does by filling his head with things from various other departments. Here are some highlights:–Witnessed a curious paper on the issues of balance and eco-feminism in LeGuin’s A Wizard of Earthsea, with a particular focus on what you might call an “Eastern influence” (yin/yang). There was some talk about the destruction of the self ego, too, but I didn’t press further on that.–Had the pleasure of hearing a short version of the history of Steampunk and its rise to popularity. I knew most of what was discussed before, but it was nice to hear a little deeper discussion about it. I asked the author how she would situate the figure of the “punk” in her assessment of Steampunk, but she seemed to agree with most that the punk postfix is primarilyy meaningless.–I saw a really fantastic presentation that analyzed various forms of imagery within the movie A.I. I would have liked to see the paper taken further, but I really enjoyed how the presenter incorporated video into his presentation. It worked very well and was quite beautiful.–I also attended a panel on Darwinism, which included a lot of discussion of Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde. One of the panelists showed some hilarious clips from old adaptations of the book; we had a good laugh.–The keynote speaker was a fellow named Adilifu Nama from the University of California, Riverside. He’s the author of an interesting book called Black Space: Imagining Race in Science Fiction Film. His speech wasn’t so much about his book than about how academics in the field of popular culture can go about reaching out to the general public to bring them into the discussion and put academic work more into the public sphere. It was a very interesting argument. I plan to purchase his book soon.–The day came to a close shortly after I attended a really interesting panel about science fiction and history. One particularly curious panel involved a critique of the belief that Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings is racist and, thus, an indicator of the author’s racism. I wasn’t aware that such things were being said, but I guess the world is a strange place, right? Evening Movie Showing: Once More, With Feeling (Buffy) and Dr. Horrible’s Sing Along BlogI had never seen either of the aforementioned musicals. Everyone tells me Dr. Horrible is amazing, and, to be honest, I think that’s an understatement. The Buffy episode aside (equally as entertaining, I think), Dr. Horrible is all kinds of brilliant. The cast is amazingly perfect, the music is memorable and fantastic, the singing is actually on par with most Broadway musicals I have seen/heard, and the story is both funny and tragic, in all the right ways. If you haven’t seen it, do…please. I feel like it changed my life. That said, “Once More, With Feeling” is also quite fantastic, although I think it works more as a gimmick episode than as a legitimate musical. The music is sometimes so-so, and obviously the actors are not always particularly strong singers. It’s more a “fan” thing than anything else. Don’t get me wrong; I loved the musical episode and will continue to do so for years to come. Probably the most entertaining aspect of seeing these two films back-to-back is having the pleasure of being a part of an audience that is deeply connected to what is being displayed. Pretty much everyone sang along; it was like going to the Rocky Horror Picture Show, but without transvestites. Additions to the New Reading List–A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. LeGuin–Phenomenology of the Mind by Hegel–Barrow (on machines/humans/etc.)–R.U.R.–Crashing the Gates of Insight–Kelheffer (on Steampunk)–Leviathan by Scott Westerfeld–Aviator/Aviatrix (concept)–Astrofuturism by Kilgore–A.I. (watch)–Moon Watchers (watch/read)–Travels in Hyperreality by Umberto Eco–Contact (watch)–Cocoon 2 (watch)–John Moffet (on extraterrestrials)–Close Encounters of the Third Kind (watch)–Valis by Philip K. Dick–Solaris by Stanislaw Lem–Pearl White–Child Loving by James Kincaid–Black Space: Imagining Race in Science Fiction Film by Adilifu Nama–Necronomicon (H. R. Giger)–Pushing Daisies (watch) And that’s it. Hope you all had a good day!

World in the Satin Bag

The SWTXPCA Conference: Day One (Addendum)

I forgot to mention that I had the opportunity to see the most excellent Mexican science fiction film called Sleep Dealer. If you haven’t seen it, you should. It’s certainly not a perfect movie (the ending is kind of silly), but I think it is one of the best foreign SF films currently in existence, and it definitely questions a lot of the problems of the world we live in today, as all SF should. And that’s all I have to say on that. More updates to come!

World in the Satin Bag

The SWTXPCA Conference: Day One (Conference Day Two)

What a great way to begin a conference. The SWTXPCA Conference (31st Annual) began on Wednesday, but, due to my school schedule and other obligations, I couldn’t leave for Albuquerque until the first day of the conference. Silly me for thinking that airline travel would go smoothly. To start things off, my flight was canceled and nobody at U.S. Airways told me until I arrived to check my bags at the lovely Gainesville airport. Thankfully, they shoved me onto a different flight, which had one less change, and no airline switching. That meant that my professional early arrival (two hours before my flight) ended up being an extra two hours. But, I made it to Albuquerque at around midnight and proceeded to put the finishing touches on my paper, since I had to present it at 8 in the morning (apparently it’s a great idea to put Battlestar Galactica at the ass-end of the morning). The presentation, however, went well. There were four of us, and when all was done and over with, there were a lot of questions and folks seemed generally receptive to my argument. Mixing Philip K. Dick with Battlestar Galactica really opens the discussion and I received some excellent suggests for how to take the research further (such as looking deeper into the cosmopolitan or rhizomatic figure–for non-academics, that means a person who is kind of between spaces/worlds, such as Helo from BSG). After that, I attended several other panels and had the pleasure of hearing some amazing papers. One in particular by a student from Lakehead University up in Canada dealt with how Futurama’s future representation is, in the end, still a reaffirmation of (American) patriarchy–a fascinating paper indeed. Pretty much every panel I attended had something fascinating going on, from discussing the problems of race in Battlestar Galactica (now I can’t think of Duala as removed from the “magical negro” trope), to a humorous, but serious look at the apparent rules to surviving the apocalypse (post-event), to representations of religion and homosexuality in 20th century young adult literature and the idea of “girly culture,” to a very fun look at Whedon’s various universes, which included an interesting discussion of the frontier “myth” in Firefly and Serenity. Needless to say, I learned a lot the first day, and feel very much like I’m at the equivalent of an academic version of a science fiction convention (with the exception being that not everything being discussed is science fiction). The only thing I wish they had more of was academic booksellers; there were several fairly important sellers at the convention, but it would have been nice to see it extended to other companies (like Routledge or Wesleyan) and to wider subjects (much of what was available focused entirely upon popular culture things; I would have liked to see some inclusion of theory that has been used in popular culture, though). I did purchase two interesting books, however: –Twain and Freud on the Human Race: Parallels on Personality, Politics, and Religion by Abraham Kupersmith–The Cinema of Mamoru Oshii: Fantasy, Technology, and Politics by Dani Cavallaro In closing out this discussion of the first day, I’ll leave you with my new reading/watching list:–Foucault and Gramsci (on the hegemonic principle)–John Locke and Schumaker (on personal identity)–Peter Singer (on suffering, which I’ve read before)–Crip Theory (or Crypt Theory)–Slave of the Thirst by Tom Holland–Herland–Jericho–Jeremiah–Zombieland–Third Space Feminism–The Cyborg Manifesto by Donna Haraway–Sandoval (on cyber-identity)–Newly Born Women by Helene Cixous–Futurama–Strange Days–The History of Sexuality by Michel Foucault–The Fatal Environment And that’s it from me for today!

World in the Satin Bag

Book Magnet Project #4: Alex Detail’s Revolution by Darren Campo

The fourth entry for the Book Magnet Project is in, and it’s for a rather curious little book: Alex Detail’s Revolution. Here goes: About the Book17 year old Alex Detail has been kidnapped and sent off to fight in a hopeless war against The Harvesters, an alien force that is trying to extinguish Earth’s Sun. Unfortunately for Alex’s kidnappers (and the world) he has lost the mega IQ that allowed him to win the last war with The Harvesters ten years ago when he was just 7 years old. But now the House of Nations is out of options. The end of life is imminent. Alex must save his ship, fight his evil clone and survive the war long enough to make it to Pluto, where, underneath the planets frozen surface lies the only force in the solar system that can stop The Harvesters.About the AuthorDarren Campo is a television executive who has overseen the production of hundreds of shows in a variety of genres. At the heart of all his stories, Campo employs Jungian archetypes for characters and Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey themes for story, which culminated in the writing of “Alex Detail’s Revolution”. Campo is currently head of programming for truTV. Just prior to the launch of truTV, Multichannel News named Darren Campo one of “40 Under 40” to watch. He graduated from the NYU’s Stern School of Business and lives in New York City. You can learn more about Darren Campo at his website. ———————————————————- There you have it. If you have a promotional magnet for your sf/f (or related) book and want to take part in this project, send an email to arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com with the subject “Book Magnet Project.” Help me cover my fridge!

World in the Satin Bag

Step One For Making Friends With English: Punctuation and Pronunciation

We all like English, right? Okay, so maybe most people don’t, but if you do, then it would only seem logical that you’d do your best to follow the very basic rules of the language, right? And wouldn’t you expect that the people who take the language seriously enough to try to make a living writing in it would do the same? I did too. I used to think that authors, of all people, had a vested interest in getting their written language right. They have to! They’re authors! But, apparently that’s not always the case. And don’t get me started on college students (commas and semicolons must have fallen out of the teaching curriculum decades ago). Hope is not lost, though. No, the world can be saved. So, I give you step one for Making Friends With English: punctuation and pronunciation. What better a place to start than there? Here goes: PunctuationThe SemicolonA semicolon is a piece of punctuation that splits two independent clauses; an independent clause is a statement like this one which does not require additional punctuation or words to stand on its own. (Everyone gets this wrong; you should know that for every time you misuse a semicolon, a baby is strangled to death by a comma.) The CommaThere are many uses for commas. First, you use them to connect two independent clauses, but with a coordinating conjunction, such as the one I used in this sentence (but). You also must use them after introductory phrases (such as “While I was at the doctor’s office buying a year’s supply of hamster tranquilizers (comma)”). However, it would take a month to tell you all the myriad ways to use a comma. So, I’ll send you to OWL instead. Thanks, Purdue! The PeriodYou use a period to end a sentence. See? Was that so hard? It was? Razor blades are on sale for $0.10 at Walmart. Hurry, there’s still time. The Question MarkYou do realize that a question mark implies that a question is being asked, right? Right?! The DashDashes are sort of like really impressive commas–or so they say. They serve a similar purpose as commas or semicolons, but they are specifically used to add emphasis on whatever is being discussed. The HyphenHyphens are used to connect words that form the same adjective, which is then followed by a noun (“I am a chocolate-loving ninja”). Or, you use them in numbers, such as the famous forty-two. There are a couple more rules, so I will send you to OWL, again. The ApostropheApostrophes are for possessives and a few other things. Don’t forget to use apostrophes for contractions, and you certainly shouldn’t ignore OWL’s discussion of possessives. If you don’t learn how to use the apostrophe correctly, you’ll die twenty years earlier than you were supposed to. I know. I’m Death’s English consultant. A few things you should know:–Commas are not semicolons. No matter how hard you try to make it true, a comma will never be a semicolon. It’s impossible. They don’t get along. Check your horoscopes.–Sentences do have to have periods. The reason is complicated, and I won’t bother trying to explain it here, because if I did, you’d be stuck reading for a month. Just know that the reasons involve a few dead guys, a rubber band, and a bottle of Kahlua.–Commas shouldn’t be thrown around willy nilly. They have a logic to them. If you can’t play nice with commas, then the English language will get you. Trust me. I’ve been on the Internet for a while. Everything comes to bite you in the ass later.–“It’s” is not the possessive form of it. “Its” is the possessive form. Learn it. PronunciationOnly a few things need to be said:–If you don’t know how to pronounce a word, then look it up or ask someone. In this day and age, it should be fairly easy to find a pronunciation guide. Hell, dictionaries (you know, those really old book things with lots of words in them, or is that not specific enough?) have pronunciation guides in them.–Yes, making up your own pronunciation, whether on purpose or because you don’t know any better, makes you look like an illiterate jackass. I don’t care if you have published a dozen books. Don’t do it.–People in other countries do say things wrong. Don’t mimic them, especially if they say “I’m right.” You should especially distrust anyone who drives on the wrong side of the road. There’s a reason why Americans drive on the right side of the road: because it’s right. Any questions?

Scroll to Top