Something about three-eyed crows creeps me out. But I suppose that’s the point of the opening of episode four: creepiness. In a way, “Cripples” mirrors “Winter is Coming” with its opening scene, presenting something which feels and appears like a strange nightmare, but which doesn’t have a direct tie to the episode at hand (at least, not one which is available to a cursory viewer). The impact of this scene will likely be felt later, much as the introduction to “Winter is Coming” will reverberate through future episodes.
“Cripples” is a curious episode, split, for the most part, between the mystery that has occupied the Starks throughout the series and Jon Snow’s travails at the Wall. The most interesting remains the first, while the latter acts as a kind of (dark) comedic relief with the introduction of the pathetic
Samwell Tarly (played by John Bradley, who may very well be the most perfect actor for this role).
Jon Snow’s narrative is not as compelling as that of the Starks, but not because Snow is uninteresting or the Wall is boring. Quite the contrary. The problem with Jon’s narrative is that what we’ve been expecting to happen hasn’t happened yet, whereas some movement has been occurring in the Stark’s search for truth. Most of Jon’s narrative is about character growth. We see Jon rising above his lesser status, growing as a leader and a man, and navigating the very different world of the Wall. But the terror we saw in “Winter is Coming” hasn’t hit Jon’s world yet. “Yet” is the crucial word. But we have Samwell Tarly, who is as craven and pathetic as readers of the series could have hoped. Even the added scenes with Sam are welcome in “Cripples.” Perhaps this is because he fits into the title of the episode, but I think it’s more because Sam shows us who Jon Snow will become even while Jon struggles to earn the respect he feels he deserves from those above his stature.
But the Starks are where the clearest danger lies. As much as Jon’s superiors bear down upon him, their threats feel somewhat empty. We’re not worried that Jon will end up dead in the morning — poisoned, stabbed, killed in battle, or what have you. Not yet. But we are worried about the Starks, who are in a dangerous place and playing a very dangerous game. The cliffhanger at the end of “Cripples” only makes this danger clearer. For me, this is the most interesting part so far in the series. I want to know what’s going to happen to the Starks: Will they find out the truth and bring it to the King? Will they die trying? Will Eddard be the next Hand to die under mysterious conditions? It’s for this reason that I’ve begun reading ahead in the book. I can’t wait a week to find out. I need the answers, and if not for the fact that HBO’s A Game of Thrones is so good at making many of its characters loathsome human beings, I might not be reading at all.
Despite my fascination with the Starks, “Cripples” has trouble relaying their narrative. The episode tries to lead us into its ending, but it never quite gels. There’s a mild disconnect between Catelyn, Eddard, and the children. They all receive some screen time in “Cripples,” but the progression they each are supposed to suggest isn’t quite there. The ending is a surprise for those who haven’t read the book, but that surprise lacked some of the impact it deserved, despite the fact that “Cripples” is the catalyst for all the major events that follow. I still enjoyed the episode, but it certainly was missing something (an emotional charge or something resembling a more linear plot).
My other problem with “Cripples” is that it is an episode which includes, as in episode three, additional scenes which serve little purpose other than to remind us of things we already know. Viserys, for example, is shown in a bathtub with the woman he purchased to teach Daenerys the “womanly arts.” They have a long discussion about the dragons of the Red Keep, and then Viserys grows angry and reminds us of his arrogance, foul attitude, and general lowly nature. But we already knew this, and a scene later in the episode reveals that same nature, making the bathtub scene redundant. If they intended to add depth to his character, all they succeeded in doing was make him more the awful person we thought he was. Perhaps the writers want us to feel less for Viserys, but I think most viewers loathed his very existence in “Winter is Coming” when he sold his sister off to Khal Drogo in order to get an army and take back the Seven Kingdoms. (There is another scene involving the King, but I think my point has been made.)
I don’t particularly care for filler scenes, nor do I care for any scene which draws me away from the characters I care about. To be honest, I would much rather spend more time with Arya, who gets very little attention in “Cripples,” than with Viserys or King Baratheon (unless Eddard is a part of the latter). Without the aforementioned scenes, the writers could have spent more time showing Eddard’s investigations or even the tournament scene, which would have added some entertainment to a very stark (no pun intended) narrative. There’s much more that could have been done, but instead we are gifted with a broken record. I’ve made similar complaints about previous episodes.
But, again, I am glad that these scenes are short and that most of “Cripples” is spend focusing on the important aspects of the story. Even with these flaws, the show is still a damn fine one. There are few adaptations that I have enjoyed as much as I am enjoying A Game of Thrones. All I can hope for is that the quality of the series remains high. Nothing can kill a good series like a couple of muddling middle episodes. “Cripples” isn’t quite muddling, but it does hint at a problem which may not be properly contained. You’ll see what I’m talking about when I get to episode five.
Directing: 3/5
Cast: 5/5
Writing: 3/5
Visuals: 5/5
Adaptation: 3/5
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
A Game of Thrones: Episode Four (“Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things”)
Reading Time
Samwell Tarly (played by John Bradley, who may very well be the most perfect actor for this role).
Despite my fascination with the Starks, “Cripples” has trouble relaying their narrative. The episode tries to lead us into its ending, but it never quite gels. There’s a mild disconnect between Catelyn, Eddard, and the children. They all receive some screen time in “Cripples,” but the progression they each are supposed to suggest isn’t quite there. The ending is a surprise for those who haven’t read the book, but that surprise lacked some of the impact it deserved, despite the fact that “Cripples” is the catalyst for all the major events that follow. I still enjoyed the episode, but it certainly was missing something (an emotional charge or something resembling a more linear plot).
My other problem with “Cripples” is that it is an episode which includes, as in episode three, additional scenes which serve little purpose other than to remind us of things we already know. Viserys, for example, is shown in a bathtub with the woman he purchased to teach Daenerys the “womanly arts.” They have a long discussion about the dragons of the Red Keep, and then Viserys grows angry and reminds us of his arrogance, foul attitude, and general lowly nature. But we already knew this, and a scene later in the episode reveals that same nature, making the bathtub scene redundant. If they intended to add depth to his character, all they succeeded in doing was make him more the awful person we thought he was. Perhaps the writers want us to feel less for Viserys, but I think most viewers loathed his very existence in “Winter is Coming” when he sold his sister off to Khal Drogo in order to get an army and take back the Seven Kingdoms. (There is another scene involving the King, but I think my point has been made.)
Directing: 3/5
(More reviews: Episode One; Episode Two; Episode Three; Episode Five; Episode Six; Episode Seven; and Episodes Eight through Ten.)
Share this:
Like this:
Related
Shaun Duke
Follow Me
Newsletter
Support Me
Recent Posts
A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)
Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:
Share this:
Like this:
Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024
And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:
Share this:
Like this:
2025: The Year of Something
We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩
Share this:
Like this:
Categories