What Are You Reading? Inquiring Minds Want to Know

Reading Time

In the interest of giving all of you the floor to talk about books, I’d like to know what you all are reading and what you think of it (anything counts, from articles to audiobooks).

I am currently smack dab in the middle of the following:

  • Down the Mysterly River by Bill Willingham (and Mark Buckingham)
    • Loving it!
  • The Uncertain Places by Lisa Goldstein
    • Interesting, but I need to get deeper before I can make a valid judgment.
  • Gateways edited by Elizabeth Anne Hull
    • Some really smart stories in here!
  • Future Media edited by Rick Wilbur
    • Just started!
  • When the Great Days Come by Gardner Dozois
    • So far:  loving it!
  • Imperial Eyes:  Travel Writing and Transculturation by Louise Pratt
    • Just started!  But I’ve read it before, and it’s an interesting text.
  • Maps of Englishness by Simon Gikandi
    • Just started!
  • The English in the West Indies by Froude (can’t remember the the first name)
    • Just started!
  • The Portable Harlem Renaissance Reader
    • Just started!
  • The New Negro:  Voices of the Harlem Renaissance
    • Just started!
I also finished a few short stories by Mary Robinette Kowal (“Clockwork Chickadee” and For Want of a Nail — the latter won the Hugo and is quite good).  And yes, I realize that is a lot of reading.  I’m a grad student.  So sue me…
So what are you reading?
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

10 Responses

  1. I just started Embassytown by China Mieville. I love his work, so I'm really excited to read something by him that's straight up sci-fi.

    I also just finished Southern Gods by John Hornor Jacobs. It was pretty good. I guess I find modern books that use stuff from the Lovecraft mythos kind of kitschy. It didn't feel like it brought much new to the table other than setting mythos stuff in the 1950's South.

    And I also just finished Leviathan Wakes by James S.A. Corey. It was really good for about two thirds. Then zombies showed up and things kind of got bogged down. The plot wrapped up pretty nicely at the end, and I'll read the hinted-at sequel.

  2. Oh, I need to read Embassytown. I have it, but haven't had the chance to read it yet.

    Was there an explanation for the zombies in the Corey?

  3. I just started reading "Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials" by Reza Negarestani the other day. I'd heard a lot of praise for it – from the likes of China Mieville, for example – and I'm always looking for weird shit, so I thought I'd give it a go.

    So far, I love and hate it in equal parts – though I'm liking it more as I learn to read the subtext/supertext/metatextual components of the story. I think there are moments where you are meant to experience the words visually, not cognitively, for example, but before I realized (or assumed) that, I thought I was just reading really bad, unclear, poorly theorized and impractical philosophy (of topology, no less). Anyway, it's a very strange book.

    Before this, I read Tom Rachman's "The Imperfectionists" – good ol' middle class white folk fiction – and "The Narrator" by Michael Cisco, another trippy weird tale. Reviews on my blog in equal measures praise and put-down!

  4. Wow you are reading a lot of stuff at the same time! I'm lucking if I can keep two books going at once.

    Right now I'm reading Bitter Angels by C. L. Anderson, it's a hard scifi thriller, it's really good. I've only been able to read it snippets at a time, and I know I'd enjoy it more if I could spend an hour or so at a time with it.

    Bed Godbey – I've been hearing all sorts of great things about Reza Negarestani, maybe i'll have to give that Cyclonopedia a try.

  5. Ben: I've heard of that one (the Negarestani). I may have to read it when I have the mental capacity to do so.

    And the Cisco is on my "I want to read this" list. One day…

    Redhead: Science fiction thrillers are fun :). I don't get them very often for review, though, which sucks.

    Bradley: Do you have an opinion on that one?

  6. It's interesting how that happens, no? I tried reading Game of Thrones a long while ago and couldn't get into it. Then I tried again and loved it.

  7. Liked it a lot. One section was unnecessary. Probably not a good Dixon book to start out with if you haven't read him before. Frog is my favorite, but it's massive. I'd recommend "I." to start with, which McSweeney's published (since it's very good and on the shorter side). Or maybe Old Friends since that's the first book that I read and how I got into him. Came across it randomly in brother's bookshelf and read it since I didn't really have anything to do.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »