Anyone who attends conferences (academic or otherwise) knows there are three kinds of annoying people who attend:
- People who run way overtime.
- People who do not come prepared to give a talk.
- People who don’t actually ask a question during the Q&A.
There are probably more, but I’d like to talk about just these three for anyone thinking of attending a conference. There may be a bit of snark to follow…
STFU Already
When I say that people who run
way overtime are annoying, I am not referring to people who add 3 minutes to a 15-minute presentation. That’s practically normal, in all honesty. Rather, I’m referring to
douchebags who run 5-10 minutes over time. Because when you run over time, you’re in fact saying “I did not prepare at all.” You’re saying “I’m more important.” “Who cares if I suck time away from the others? They’re dumbasses anyway.”
And here’s the truth: you’re not that interesting that we want to hear you talk for longer than the allotted time. Really. You’re not. While you drone on and on about your topic, we’re hoping you’ll shut up so we can get a drink, or shift in our chairs, or move on to another person with a different topic. Some of us even hope you fall down so we can laugh. Others hope for worse things (perhaps you’ll catch an STD from the chair, or one of the lamp fixtures will accidentally fall on you, or a gorilla will run into the room and kidnap you…if only…)
If you go to a conference, don’t be that guy. Practice. It’s okay if you go over a little bit. It happens. Things never go exactly as planned. But don’t bring a 20-page paper to a conference where you’ve got 20 minutes to present. 3 minutes a double-spaced page — that’s the average.
Rambling About Nonsense Does Not a Talk Make
Let me tell you a story about an annoying person. This person happened to have flown all the way to Florida from a foreign university (no, the foreign-ness isn’t relevant except to say “he came a long way for a conference”). He came with some papers in hand — presumably his presentation. And so, when said person went up to give his talk, you’d assume he gave something like a talk, right? Wrong. Said person decided that he’d ramble about a famous philosopher for close to 20 minutes (5 minutes over time; see previous point), read three paragraphs from his presentation, and decided his presentation would be a good time to hawk his book and the conference he’s putting together elsewhere. Oh-ho! You sly devil.
People come to conferences for two main reasons:
- To meet people (network)
- To hear new ideas
They don’t go to conferences to be lectured to about things that make no sense, nor to be inundated with advertising.
When you go to a conference, it is essential that you actually have something prepared. It need not be an essay proper. I’ve seen great talks given by people working straight from notes, and people working from PowerPoint. But you have to have something to say, or you’re wasting everyone’s time. And that pisses people off, especially if they have academic standards.
Is There a Question in There?
I once suffered the consequences of a rambler at an academic conference. Ramblers are a kind of pernicious virus that can’t actually infect anyone with anything but annoyance. This rambler decided to use all 15 minutes of the Q&A section to launch critiques at one of my fellow panelists. No questions. Just “I disagree, and here’s why, and also there’s this, and here’s why that is relevant. Oh? You answered? Well, how about this…”
If it takes you more than one minute to lay out your question, then you should save it for afterwards. Q&A is about getting answers; it is not your soapbox. We don’t want to hear your voice for 15 minutes. Get your own panel! If you want a soapbox, get a blog (hey, look at that — I’ve got one!). Otherwise, ask your question, sit down, and shut up.
And Moving On
Don’t do these things. If you want to be taken seriously. If you want people to be interested in what you have to say. If you actually want people to respect your opinion (that doesn’t mean they like you, but it does mean that when they listen, they actually want to engage). If you want all that, then you have to act like a professional. Come prepared with an appropriate-length presentation. And make sure that you don’t spend forever trying to ask a non-question question.
Or you can be a douchebag. Up to you…
Any questions?
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Basic Conference Etiquette: Don’t Be THAT Guy
Reading Time
Anyone who attends conferences (academic or otherwise) knows there are three kinds of annoying people who attend:
Share this:
Like this:
Related
Shaun Duke
Follow Me
Newsletter
Support Me
Recent Posts
A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)
Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:
Share this:
Like this:
Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024
And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:
Share this:
Like this:
2025: The Year of Something
We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩
Share this:
Like this:
Categories