Adventures in Worldbuilding: How to Ruin it All…

Reading Time

If you’re going to create a science fiction world, you cannot snatch up a random ancient culture and toss it into a universe in which interstellar travel is relatively widespread, servant robots are efficient and plentiful, and so on. If you want something like slavery to exist in such a world, you have to have a damn good reason for it beyond “they just don’t like them.” You have to adapt such things to technology. Otherwise, you’re completely ignoring the impact technology has on the development of culture.

This is not the same as taking an analogue of a European medieval culture and inserting it into a fantasy world (unless, of course, you have a lot of magic and have made no effort to demonstrate how magic changes the cultures of a medieval society). There are at least reasonable assumptions one can make about early technological developments in human cultures. But it does not work in a science fiction universe as a cultural standard.

This is one of the few things that will make me toss a book across the room: when your world makes no sense.

Mashing together ancient cultures with advanced future worlds simply does not work. No matter how hard you cram an eagle into a pig, you will not come out with a flying pig.

Sadly, a lot of people try to do this, and their books suffer as a result, because the moment I stop and say, “This doesn’t make any sense,” is the moment when I’ve been pulled out of the story. It won’t be easy to go back after that.

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. But slavery exists in the most modern, technologically advanced civilisations we have on Earth. What makes you think that this will be radically different in the future?

    Let's say an alien race comes along, takes pity on us, and decides to uplift us in one area. Oh, let's say, energy efficiency. Suddenly all forms of energy production we have are ten times as powerful.

    What happens? Well, based on historical precedent, a whole lot of chaos, some readjustment, a shift in power bases, and then we continue on pretttttty much as we have been. People have all this free time! And energy! What do they do with it? Keep growing! Keep exploring!

    As we move towards the future, the areas we explore become orders of magnitude larger, smaller, and infinitely more complex. That doesn't mean that we don't try heuristics that have been embedded in us since ancient times.

  2. A) I'm talking traditional slavery, not wage slavery or modern derivations of slave labor. The most modern, technologically advanced civs, therefore, do not have slaves in the traditional sense of the term.

    B) Because technology changes our relationship to capital, to people, to consumption, and so on. In my scenario, technology has made labor literally valueless, because robots can essentially do it all. And yet, this world owns slaves in the same sense that the European Empires of the last 3 or 4 centuries did: as labor. That was the principle value of slavery at the time. All else was secondary. Slaves built the colonies. They tilled the fields. They provided for Empire.

    But in my scenario, there is nothing for the slaves to provide. They are slaves being put to work, but there's no rationale for it. It simply doesn't make sense as a world. People don't enslave other people for no reason. There is always a reason.

    Now for your scenario:
    If limitless energy is made possible (let's take the aliens out just for the sake of making this not reliant on a sudden intrusion), then you're talking about a cultural development that will see class systems collapse and reform, new interactions with environment, self, others, etc. If slavery exists in this scenario, it needs to exist for a very compelling reason, but not for some old time reason (labor).

    Does that make sense? Or am I rambling nonsense?

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »