Dear Media: Please Stop Reporting Things That Ruin the Ending…

Reading Time

I’m talking about this.  Do not click or scroll over the link if you don’t want a beloved science fiction series ruined for you.  There will be no specifics below, so don’t worry.

Whether you’ve read the link or not, the basic gist is this:  a certain someone has confirmed that they will or will not return to a TV show, and the media has reported this fact with glee.

Why is this a problem?  Because the moment I know an actor or actress is or is not returning to a TV show, I know howhow the show ends.  In this particular case, that is bad news indeed because it means the emotion I would normally feel at the end of a show like this will never come.  I have
no reason to be emotional.  I know what’s going to happen before the series is even over.  In this case, the season has already been filmed, which means whatever has happened at the end is already written into the narrative.  Nobody is surprised.  Nobody has to find a way to get this person out of the show (or keep them in) without pissing off the fans.  They’ve already settled the issue.

None of this has anything to do with spoilers in and of themselves.  I don’t have a problem with the media talking about things that have or have not already aired.  I do have a problem, however, when the headline is the spoiler.  In this case, that’s exactly the problem.  The headline doesn’t say “Will X be back next fall?  We Ask X About It” or something like that.  It just says “X will be back next fall” or “X will not be back next fall.”  Unless I stop reading stuff on the Internet, I cannot avoid this bit of information.

Color me pissed off.

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. Well, I'm a moron. I moused over the link to see where it linked to and got the spoiler without even clicking!

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »