June 2013

SF/F Commentary

A Comic Journey: New Comics, New Reading, and the Happy Shaun

Nothing I’m about to say here will seem cohesive.  I’ve become obsessed with comics, if you didn’t already know.  Gloriously and deliciously obsessed.  You all probably saw it coming, though, particularly after I wrote this post about my first trip to a comic shop in years (and this review I wrote some time back).  What follows will be a rough outline of my journey into this new obsession…thus far — by way of what I’ve read. Since my first trip to the comic store, I have read the following comics or hardcover/softcover collections (in print or digital form)(I’ve included quick thoughts under each item): Batman (New 52) Vol. 1:  The Court of Owls (Snyder, Capullo, and Glapion) I freaking loved it!  So much so that I have officially become a Batman nut, and this despite having almost always been a Marvel guy.  Snyder is an amazing writer, in my very humble and ignorant opinion.  If you are interested in superhero comics, I definitely recommend The Court of Owls.  I’m not sure you could get into it if you weren’t already familiar with Batman as a character, but if you’ve seen the Nolan Batman movies and enjoyed them, then I think you’ll love The Court of Owls. Green Lantern (New 52) Vol. 1:  Sinestro (Johns and Mahnke) Honestly, I was not impressed.  This collection contains the full narrative arc for the start of the new Green Lantern series, but it moves so quickly that all the character development is shoved to the side.  I love action in comics (see some of the stuff that I’ll mention later), but I need something more than thin character conflict amidst lots of fighting and flashy stuff.  I don’t know if this is a reflection of the entire set of Green Lantern comics (there are many), but this one didn’t impress me enough to check them out. The Avengers Disassembled (trade paperback)(Bendis and Finch) I bought this because it forms the basis for the huge shifts in The New Avengers series.  Unfortunately, so much happens in such a short series that I couldn’t get into it.  Essentially, the Scarlet Witch alters all of reality, killing off a lot of characters, turning people against one another, exposing some of her friends’ worst fears, etc.  And why does she do this?  Because she’s sort of gone insane.  The problem?  None of this is explored in any depth.  We start with action, we continue with action, and we end with action.  Maybe there’s more to this that I’m not seeing, as sometimes happens in Marvel (other series might address what occurs here, for example), but considering how good the Avengers vs. X-Men cross-over has been thus far, I don’t really see that as an excuse.  Basically, I was not impressed. The New Avengers:  Breakout (Vol. 1, trade paperback) (Bendis and Finch) Following the conclusion of The Avengers Disassembled, this first volume in the new-ish series actually improves upon the flaws of its predecessor.  But it still does not reach the same level as some of the things I’ll list here that I actually loved.  Yes, there is a lot more character development (particularly surrounding Stark and Captain America as they deal with trying to make a new response team in a drastically different world), but I found the initial “OMG, all da mutants got out-a-da jail” plot pretty dull.  This stuff happens so often in superhero comics that I honestly can’t figure out why humans and mutants alike haven’t bothered trying to figure out ways to stop jailbreaks from happening.  That said, I do think this moves things in the right direction. Uncanny X-Men #1 (Marvel NOW) (Bendis, Bachalo, Townsend, Mendoza, Vey, and Caramagna) First, I do not recommend starting with this particular incarnation of the classic series (what is referred to as Uncanny X-Men Vol. 3).  The first issue refers to a number of huge events that occurred in the Avengers vs. X-Men cross-over, which you can find in trade paperback collections.  Basically, you need to read that cross-over before you dive in here, unless you don’t care about what happened to some of the classic X-Men characters (deaths, people switched sides, etc. etc. etc.).  However, the first issue is really good.  For some reason, Bendis does an excellent job creating balance between character and the group-focus of the X-Men (something he didn’t do all that well in the New Avengers stuff). X-Men #1 and #2 (Stan Lee) That’s right, the classic X-Men!  And they are bloody terrible.  Yes, I know they are representative of the time period and that many of the things I can’t stand about the classic Stan Lee comics existed for a reason, but I definitely prefer reading newer stuff.  Nostalgia is nice, but I can only take so many sexist jokes at a time… Marvel Point One:  Behold the Watcher (2011) (too many names to list) Everything I have to say about this can be found here. All of the following are part of a narrative sequence — hence the odd order.  I gave up trying to list all the names (sorry): The Avengers:  Sanction #1 – #4, The Avengers #24.1, Avengers vs. X-Men #0-#1, Wolverine and the X-Men #9, New Avengers #24, Avengers vs. X-Men #2, Avenger #25, AvX:  Versus #1, Uncanny X-Men #11, and AvX #3. Honestly, I’m still neck deep into this particular series, and I’m loving every single issue.  There’s a lot of action, of course, but one of the things I really like is the attempt to get into the heads of each character as the action ramps up.  Basically, most of these issues actually explore the personal conflicts of the characters leading up to the physical conflict.  There are a few hiccups here or there, but I think the series is fantastic overall.  If you like group-based superhero stuff, I definitely recommend this one, not just because it’s good, but also because it also sets up a lot of the stuff that happens in the Marvel NOW Uncanny X-Men series. I am currently reading the following (w/ brief

SF/F Commentary

SFWA, Sexism, and Progress (A Response to Jason Sanford)

(Note:  I originally intended this as a short comment on this recent post by Jason Sanford.  In his post, he basically suggests that the men in our field need to stand up and say “no” to sexism; his post is, I think quite obviously, a response to the SFWA Bulletin kerfluffle from this weekend, which he also wrote about here.  Both of his posts are worth reading.  In any case, my response will maintain its original format, so assume the “you” refers to Sanford.) I’ve found it rather frustrating to hear people defend some of these sexists (or people engaging in sexist activity) against attack (I’m not using any particular individual in this comment, even though I think it’s obvious that your post is in response to the SFWA Bulletin thing).  They often say things like “attacking the person is wrong” or “they are really nice people” and so on and so forth.  I don’t doubt that a lot of people who say or do sexist things don’t realize that what they’re doing is, in fact, sexist (not all, but some).  Some of them have always done these things and probably haven’t been formally challenged before; their responses, in many cases, are not unusual in that respect.  When you’ve done something your whole life, and have never been properly challenged for that behavior, a shift in the dialogue surrounding said behavior may seem like an attack on one’s person.  I am, of course, speaking from my own assumptions and from my own experiences as someone who considered himself a pro-women’s-rights-but-not-a-feminist man who subscribed to a number of sexist concepts/ideas/assumptions without realizing they were sexist.  Granted, I’ve never seriously suggested anything quite as batshit as we’ve seen among the radical contingent in SF/F (i.e., the Vox Days). But there comes a point at which we have to demand change.  Just because you are a nice person and you do nice things for writers and what not is not an excuse for us to ignore other poor behavior.  Bad behavior is bad behavior.  Holding our tongues just because someone is a nice person or because it’s supposedly “civil” will not change that behavior.  People who defend the sexists in our midst sometimes don’t understand that leaving such behavior unchallenged actually validates it.  It reinforces the behavior.  While it’s a nice thought to suggest that women should have stood up for themselves back in the day, we have to remember that a lot of the ideas we’ve seen raised in official SF/F platforms are descended from a time when women didn’t have the political authority to change things from the inside — not if they wanted careers in SF/F.  In some respects, that’s still true (as you noted when you pointed to Ann Aguirre’s disheartening post about her treatment as a woman in our community — the hate mail is horrifying).  SF/F is getting better, but it is not helped by leaving sexism or any nasty ism unchecked.  And that means telling people off for shitty behavior.  I’m not sure how you do that without making those individuals realize that there is a social cost for said behavior, which is where I tend to disagree with some defenders who call foul on ad hominem attacks — if the statement is true, then the fallacious form does not arise. Another thing that annoys me about this discussion is the odd, and sometimes occasional, double standard.  For some reason, we’re supposed to accept sexist behavior as “something you wave off,” whereas other isms are unacceptable.  If X spends an entire column saying anti-Semitic or clearly racist things, we are right to look down on that — you don’t talk about *insert racial slurs here* in our community without paying the social cost everyone else pays.  But if X say a bunch of sexist things, suddenly you can’t go after them.  We just have to realize they’re nice guys, and we should show them the same respect they…don’t show to women?  (See N.K. Jemisin’s comment below for why everything in this paragraph is bullcrap.) I think that’s bullshit.  There isn’t an easy way to point out sexism without going after the person.  Behavior comes from within.  Good people look at criticism of their behavior and learn from it.  They don’t self-censor.  They learn.  I’ve learned a hell of a lot the last few years, despite having always been a feminist (sorta — see above).  And it has made me a better person, because I recognized my own failings, my own sexist inclinations (inherited from a still largely sexist culture), and I worked on them.  That’s not censorship.  That’s not thought-policing.  That’s what we do when we want to make for a better world.  We try to be better people. I think it’s fair to say that you and I (or anybody) are not expecting perfection.*  We are expecting some semblance of growth, though.  It’s no longer acceptable to say “back in my day, we could do whatever we wanted and nobody said a thing.”  That kind of logic allows one to support all manner of poor behaviors.  Progress doesn’t happen when we are stuck in the past.  It happens when we learn from the past and try to move towards something better.  Humanity is an imperfect beast, and part of life, in my mind, is trying to reach the next step on the way to perfection.  It’s like a ladder to the stars:  each new rung brings us closer to the nearest star, until finally we reach it and realize there are other stars to reach, and so we continue putting up new rungs. I’m rambling.  The point is that I agree with the notion that we all need to speak out against this behavior (though some of us never will).  We need to support the people who have already spoken out, whether they are women or men.  Sexism is wrong (obvious statement is obvious).  No.  It’s bullshit.  We should call it out when we see

SF/F Commentary

Top 10 Blog Posts for May 2013

And once again, some oldies sprung up out of nowhere and took some spots from the new boys.  I don’t know why these posts remain so popular, but so be it. Here’s the list: 10.  Shocking Revelations:  Pointing Out Racism Doesn’t Mean You Hate White People 9.  Link of the Week:  Judith Butler Explained with Cats! 8.  The Black Guy is Ruining the Fantastic Four Reboot! 7.  Movie Review:  Star Trek (Why It Sucks and Why Abrams Needs to Stop) 6.  Top 10 Cats in Science Fiction and Fantasy 5.  The End of Good Writing:  The Damage of Twilight, Harry Potter, and Their Friends 4.  Shoot the WISB #02:  Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Reviewed w/ Paul Weimer and Jay Garmon 3.  Silly Reader Questions:  Super Powers, Magic, Bathrooms, and Poetry 2.  Top 10 Most Ridiculous Moments in Science Fiction and Fantasy Film in the 90s 1.  Top 10 Overused Fantasy Cliches I wonder which posts people actually enjoyed reading in May…

Scroll to Top