Conventions: The Simple, Step-by-Step Approach for Handling Disability at Cons

Reading Time

I posted a truncated version of this on Rose Lemberg’s post about some of accessibility problems at Worldcon this year.  Apparently one of the Worldcon staff members thought blaming people with disabilities was a better idea than simply saying “yeah, we screwed that up and we’re sorry and here’s how we’re going to fix it.”

Well, I’ve got an idea for how to fix it.  It’s called the Simple, Step-by-Step Approach for Handling Disability at Cons for Convention Staff (or Sad Cocos for short).  It goes something like this:

  1. Send emails and notices to all attendees requesting anyone with mobility issues to contact you.
  2. Send those notices again shortly before the convention (a week ahead, perhaps) just in case the first message didn’t arrive.
  3. Keep a list of all equipment requirements for various panels and events at the con.  You should know where things need to be and when so you can properly coordinate.
  4. Before the convention starts, go through all of the areas where attendees are allowed to go.  If any areas are not accessible, fix it right away.  Make sure you have enough ramps based on past attendance (I would say three is a bare minimum, but I could be really wrong there)
  5. Tell your registration staff to be mindful of people with mobility issues.  They should check names against panelist rosters when folks come to register to make sure everything is covered.  I wouldn’t recommend drawing attention to anything (this is where folks who actually have disabilities should jump in with an opinion — please!)
  6. If someone comes to the registration desk who is on a panel and has mobility issues, the staff should double check that ramps and what not are pegged to go to X location at Y time.  If you didn’t know that this individual needed ramps, you should make a note of it on your schedule and update relevant staff about the change right away.  If for some reason you don’t have enough ramps at a given time, consider getting another (if possible) OR finding a way to maintain that individual’s dignity without making everyone aware that there’s a ramp issue (perhaps move all of the tables to floor level between panels or something).
  7. If someone complains about mobility problems at your con, you should contact them for specifics, apologize, and tell them you will try to fix it next time.  Don’t argue about it.  Don’t blame them for not getting in touch.  You’re in charge of the damned event, so it’s up to you to make sure everything is accessible.
That’s it.  Seems pretty simple, no?
Note:  it seems as if Worldcon stopped somewhere around step 3.
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. The issue is this—those who don't have disabilities will never really grasp the needs of those who do. I see it everywhere, from ramps that are too steep to walk-in showers in bathrooms where the floor is slippery when wet. I had a hotel room with a walk-in shower where the faucet had been turned off so tightly we had to have maintenance come and loosen it, and the tile floor outside was good for skating when your feet were wet.

    What convention planners need to do is make the effort to either have one or more people with disabilities on staff or connect with a local organization of same to consult. They must then be very specific when dealing with the convention venue staff, because it will be a given they are convinced their facility is fully accessible. I've yet to be in one that was.

    I didn't get to any panels so can't speak to the lack of ramps to the dais, but I will say the committee did try hard to address accessibility issues; and I give them points for that. It's just that you wouldn't set up an art show without getting input from artists on layout and lighting and so on, yet how many con coms ensure they have someone with disabilities around to address those issues?

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »