Last night, I saw Jodorowsky’s Dune, a documentary about a film which was never made but has nonetheless had a remarkable impact on science fiction film since its development in the 1970s. In all honesty, I had never heard of this ill-fated “adaptation” of Frank Herbert’s classic novel, and so it was with great pleasure that I saw the poster at my local theater and realized I’d have the chance to watch a documentary about something science fictional.
Jodorowsky’s Dune (JD from now on)
is an insane journey into what may have been the most experimental science fiction epic ever devised.
Alejandro Jodorowsky was a noted surrealistic filmmaker in the 60s and 70s, producing such works as
El Topo and
The Holy Mountain, and so anyone familiar with his work might understand just how ambitious, and, indeed, insane, Jodorowsky could be. The documentary, however, provides enough context about Jodorowsky’s career — namely, through short excerpts from the aforementioned works — to convey the wildly imaginative vision that led to
Dune. Throughout the documentary, Jodorowsky passionately lays out the spiritual and ideological agenda that guided the film from start to finish and his view of film as a medium for producing art and capturing the human spirit. From his perspective,
Dune was always meant to be a spiritual journey created by spiritual “warriors” (his term), and so the eccentric and seemingly counter-intuitive choices made throughout the initial development has a certain kind of logic to it. The documentary lays these elements out primarily through Jodorowsky himself, whose passion and yearning for the promise of
Dune almost flows out of the screen like a river of dreams. Insofar as a documentary can present beauty, JD does so by giving room to its primary subject.
Part of the documentary’s charm, as such, rests in Jodorowsky’s character: an enigmatic, uncompromising filmmaker who appears to honestly believe in the liberative potential in film as an art form. It’s that uncompromising nature which might explain why
Dune was never made, though JD never explicitly says as much. Whatever one might think of his filmography, JD’s character study reveals a visionary whose passion and spirituality guide his artistic process. This isn’t just a film about
Dune; it is a film about Jodorowsky and his methods, about the processes of making art as opposed to entertainment. From the often humorous tales about cast selections and negotiations (Salvador Dali being one of the more amusing examples) to Jodorowsky’s amusing style of telling these tales, there is much to love about the framing of JD as a kind of surrealist documentary adventure. Jodorowsky himself acknowledges that he imagined
Dune as taking the audience on an LSD trip without them ever actually taking drugs and that this process should alter their perceptions: of film, of the human subject, of reality. JD explores this vision with an unmeasured hand, giving Jodorowsky space to expound upon his visions, desires, and dreams rather than remaining focused on the objective truth one might receive with a history. Unlike, for example, a
Star Wars documentary (which I happen to be watching at this moment —
Empire of Dreams), JD is a deeply personal exploration. That subjective perspective gave me a deeper connection to the material, as it is only through the personal element, I would argue, that we can understand what
Dune was meant to be.
In that respect, the remaining elements are all funneled through Jodorowsky’s spiritual agenda, such that all of the production crew and cast choices are identified with the spiritual “warriors” about which the audience is repeatedly reminded. H.R. Giger (
Alien), Michel Seydoux (
Cyrano de Bergerac), Dan O’Bannon (
Alien,
Total Recall, etc.), and others each have their moment in the spotlight, each reinforcing Jodorowsky’s narrative, which JD frames by beginning with Jodorowsky and ending with a brief discussion of the influence
Dune has had on sf film since — the actual conclusion tells us that Seydoux and Jodorowsky have teamed up to make another film (
The Dance of Reality). I do take issue with the conclusions drawn from this influence, though, as it seems specious to assume similarities in future films are always necessarily influenced by a single predecessor. True, Giger and O’Bannon worked together on
Alien, but JD tries to support this claim by placing images side-by-side, as if suggesting that two similarly-shaped items are necessarily connected on the same line rather than, perhaps, the product of an individual’s visions (Giger’s, for example). There are also moments where JD tries to argue that other films were influenced by
Dune without having any direct connection to its creative talents — at least, no connection that is made apparent to the audience. This seems to undercut Jodorowsky’s claim that
Dune was meant to inspire, even if the final moments of the film are, indeed, rather inspiring. Perhaps I expect such claims to be more firmly grounded in objective truth, which JD seems averse to doing precisely because of its primary subject.
For me, part of what made this documentary so fascinating was the feeling that I too was being taken on a journey of sorts. I didn’t know about Jodorowsky’s Dune, and so every stage of documentary revealed details which breathed life into a project I had no personal connection to. By the end, I felt the same yearning for Dune that Jodorowsky relived as he explored his memories of the film that was never born. There is something unique about this version of Dune that I now feel deserves to be on the screen, even if it will never be so. The worst case scenario would be the release of the rare production book Jodorowsky and Seydoux used to entice the studios to fund them; this would give all of us access to a vision that has remained hidden, and it just might open new pathways to the imagination in a manner consistent with Jodorowsky’s spiritual agenda. Whether that will ever happen is up to speculation, but it should happen. It must happen. I’d certainly buy such a book.
Regardless, this is a film I recommend any fan of sf see immediately. It’s crazy, beautiful, and enormously entertaining. As far as documentaries go, this is easily one of my favorites.
Directing: N/A
Cast: N/A
Writing: N/A.
Visuals: N/A
Adaptation: N/A
Overall: N/A (note: the point-based grading is worthless here, so I’m only providing an inflated grade)
Inflated Grade: A
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
Movie Review: Jodorowsky’s Dune (2013)
Reading Time
Share this:
Like this:
Related
Shaun Duke
Follow Me
Newsletter
Support Me
Recent Posts
A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)
Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:
Share this:
Like this:
Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024
And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:
Share this:
Like this:
2025: The Year of Something
We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩
Share this:
Like this:
Categories