The Downsides to Owning Way Too Many Books

Reading Time

Yeah, I know. There’s no such thing as “too many books,” except when there is.

As I mentioned recently, I’ve been slogging through Stephen King’s IT on a mission to get a fuller picture of the story we’ve been told 1.5 times in film. When I say “slogging,” I mean it. For all that I enjoy about the book, there are so many things that I don’t, most notably its massive page count and glacial pace. It comes back to that “big books” problem, which I’ve talked about before (probably on Twitter somewhere) — albeit in a somewhat different context. In brief, I’ve avoided books over 300-350 pages for years simply because I work so much and read too slow.

With all that swirling around in my head, I decided to put IT down for a bit to put my brain into something else. All of this leads me to my topic for today:

I cannot pick new books to read!

As the title suggests, that’s not due to a lack of access. I own a LOT of books. Not as much as others who have been at this collecting thing almost as long as I’ve been alive, but more books than most people. There are 9 bookshelves in my one bedroom apartment, almost all of which are double-stacked. And there are boxes of books under my bed. And in my closet. And I have about 10-15 years worth of Analog SF issues in banana boxes somewhere. In other words, I own a LOT of books.1

For some strange reason, this has made trying to find new things to read a daunting task. When I peruse the shelves, I’m struck by how much there is to read and how infrequently books jump out at me. It’s not that there aren’t good books in the sea. I know for a fact that there are dozens and dozens of absolutely great novels, many of them I probably should read. Rather, there’s something about the size of the book sea that keeps the brain juices frozen. I’m like a deer in headlights waiting for the car to hit me, only it’s actually a kid on his bicycle with a really big spotlight.

There’s another side of this, too. It’s a guilty side. I know I won’t be able to read everything I own (most likely). So every choice I make is a rejection of a lot of works I simply won’t get to. For me, that’s a horrifying prospect. What if I miss an important experience or ignore an important author? I remember reading the entire Harry Potter series on a whim and coming out of it feeling like I’d done something worthwhile. I cried when Dumbledore died. I read the last book over the course of a day and a half. I devoured those books, and it was all because of John Williams and my sister. If I hadn’t been a Star Wars fan and seen Williams’ name on the soundtrack for the first Harry Potter movie, I might never have gone to the movie or asked my sister why she liked the books so much.

Maybe that’s it. Maybe it’s the absence of those kinds of organic experiences that makes finding new things to read in my shelves so much less “fun.” If so, I’m not sure how to correct that. There are so few opportunities to have those experiences. My sister isn’t waiting in the shadows — waiting to throw another book at me.2

All I know is this:  like everything else that’s related to my profession, I’m struggling to find the motivation or interest.

Maybe the book thing isn’t unique to me, so I’ll turn it to the reader:  Do you ever have this problem? If so, how do you deal with it?

Footnotes

  1. Don’t forget the 5 longboxes full of comics!
  2. Well, sort of. She does wait in the shadows, but I don’t know why. I see you, sister!
Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Digg
Reddit
LinkedIn

2 Responses

  1. I don’t often have this problem. Reviewing means I have particular things to read and a deadline. Reading for myself is governed by what I can fit in between deadlines and is usually a contrasting genre to serve as a palate cleanser.

    However, when it does strike, I usually pick either the first or last book on my list of acquisitions (there’s a spreadsheet). Some friends I know read the first pages of a bunch of books until something strikes them. Other friends pick a selection, then conduct a Twitter poll (which has always seemed like fun to me). This latter could also be a good way of getting back that organic experience, if your followers chime in with what they like about the books you’ve listed.

    I hope you find something that works for you.

Leave a Reply

Follow Me

Newsletter

Support Me

Recent Posts

A Reading List of Dystopian Fiction and Relevant Texts (Apropos of Nothing in Particular)

Why would someone make a list of important and interesting works of dystopian fiction? Or a suggested reading list of works that are relevant to those dystopian works? There is absolutely no reason other than raw interest. There’s nothing going on to compel this. There is nothing in particular one making such a list would hope you’d learn. The lists below are not an exhaustive list. There are bound to be texts I have forgotten or texts you think folks should read that are not listed. Feel free to make your own list and tell me about it OR leave a comment. I’ll add things I’ve missed! Anywhoodles. Here goes:

Read More »

Duke’s Best EDM Tracks of 2024

And so it came to pass that I finished up my annual Best of EDM [Insert Year Here] lists. I used to do these on Spotify before switching to Tidal, and I continued doing them on Tidal because I listen to an absurd amount of EDM and like keeping track of the tunes I love the most. Below, you will find a Tidal playlist that should be public. You can listen to the first 50 tracks right here, but the full playlist is available on Tidal proper (which has a free version just like Spotify does). For whatever reason, the embedded playlist breaks the page, and so I’ve opted to link to it here and at the bottom of this post. Embeds are weird. Or you can pull songs into your preferred listening app. It’s up to you. Some caveats before we begin:

Read More »

2025: The Year of Something

We’re nine days into 2025, and it’s already full of exhausting levels of controversy before we’ve even had a turnover in power in my home country of the United States. We’ve seen resignations of world leaders, wars continuing and getting worse and worse (you know where), the owner of Twitter continuing his tirade of lunacy and demonstrating why the billionaire class is not to be revered, California ablaze with a horrendous and large wildfire, right wing thinktanks developing plans to out and attack Wikipedia editors as any fascist-friendly organization would do, Meta rolling out and rolling back GenAI profiles on its platforms, and, just yesterday, the same Meta announcing sweeping changes to its moderation policies that, in a charitable reading, encourage hate-based harassment and abuse of vulnerable populations, promotion and support for disinformation, and other problems, all of which are so profound that people are talking about a mass exodus from the platform to…somewhere. It’s that last thing that brings me back to the blog today. Since the takeover at Twitter, social networks have been in a state of chaos. Platforms have risen and fallen — or only risen so much — and nothing I would call stability has formed. Years ago, I (and many others far more popular than me) remarked that we’ve ceded the territory of self-owned or small-scale third party spaces for massive third party platforms where we have minimal to no control or say and which can be stripped away in a tech-scale heartbeat. By putting all our ducks into a bin of unstable chaos, we’re also expending our time and energy on something that won’t last, requiring us to expend more time and energy finding alternatives, rebuilding communities, and then repeating the process again. In the present environment, that’s impossible to ignore.1 This is all rather reductive, but this post is not the place to talk about all the ways that social networks have impacted control over our own spaces and narratives. Another time, perhaps. I similarly don’t have space to talk about the fact that some of the platforms we currently have, however functional they may be, have placed many of us in a moral quagmire, as in the case of Meta’s recent moderation changes. Another time… ↩

Read More »