Randomly Santa Cruz
Random pictures to make you happy inside, or at least sort of happy. Eh, be happy if you want to, or not. It’s up to you. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
Random pictures to make you happy inside, or at least sort of happy. Eh, be happy if you want to, or not. It’s up to you. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
I have a curious question. Is it wrong, not recommended, or downright stupid to email back and editor and thank them for the comments they made in a personalized rejection notice?I don’t want to do something considered a “no no”. Any thoughts? (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
Forward thinking doesn’t mean that science fiction has to be 100% forward thinking. What it means is that science fiction looks ahead to the trials and tribulations of the near and distant future. Criticizing science fiction for trying to be culturally realistic about the future of U.S. Presidency is somewhat pointless. In fact, criticizing SF for failing to have a diverse cast of future U.S. Presidents is criticizing it for being realistic. The fact of the matter is, the U.S. is behind the times and may be that way for a long time. Even if Barack Obama wins the election, he will not have done anything to change the nation as far as race goes. The U.S. has issues with racism for a reason, and despite our desire to consider ourselves impartial on race, that’s far from the truth. We are a nation of different peoples and while we do share similar ideals about our nation (pursuit of happiness, justice, liberty, and those things) we are all very separate. I am not like someone from the South, just as someone from the South is not like someone from Hawaii or California or Alaska. Yes, we may all have similarities, but we all differ in how we speak and how we go about our lives.So, when I see that science fiction has not been “forward thinking” about race, I see reality being put into place. We can all hope that the future will be filled with complete equality, but that won’t happen, not unless we do become a country with equal representation of “races” or we all cease to see color/race as an issue.Unfortunately, as the clever little puppets from Avenue Q once said: Everyone’s a little bit racist, sometimes. Go ahead, tell me you’re not, because you’re lying and you know it (it’s possible you don’t even know you’re a little bit racist). By the way, this is nothing against the SF Flare folks. I do appreciate the information they provided, but I think we get a bit disillusioned by the prospect of SF being something that, in reality, it isn’t. SF can only be forward thinking so long as it is realistic. A liberal fest of social changes on top of the technological changes is asking a bit much from a genre that has to not only accurately portray the future, but also has to be realistic and believable about it. We’re no longer in the Golden Age where making everything up works 100%. SF writers have to be, well, realistic. Are black presidents in our future? Yes. Are Hispanic and female presidents? Of course. Do I think they will be a consistent regularity that one could play it off in any story, every single time? No. We don’t even see that in other nations we consider more “forward thinking” than us, so why would we expect that a fictional future United States would represent something that likely isn’t going to happen?
(For writers, from a listener).I listen to a lot of audio interviews with authors. From The Agony Column to Adventures in Scifi Publishing to The Dragon Page (among many others), there is a plethora of great interviews out there. But there are also interviews that, while interest, are truly boring. The problem isn’t so much what is being said, but how it’s being said or how the author presents him or herself. And when you fail to interest the listener, you fail to get them to buy your books (or other work). So, having said that, and having spend the last few months digging through hundreds of podcast interviews, here are a few points of advice on how to prepare yourself for an audio interview: Speak w/ enthusiasmSounds obvious, doesn’t it? Well, a lot of writers don’t have this down. You have to make it clear how excited you are about your work. If you don’t seem excited about your work, or just excited in generally, then what’s to make us (the listeners) at all interested in you? I know there are many writers who are rather quiet, and perhaps some of them are shy. Get over it. Generally podcast interviewers are really laid back. They want to have fun doing the interview. So, if you present yourself as someone who is interesting and fun, they’ll be more receptive to you, and as a result, probably ask you more entertaining questions. Be preparedOkay, this might be a no-brainer, but it does become obvious that some writers out there aren’t prepared. Review your work, past and present, and know what you’re talking about. If you have a new book coming out, or one that just came out, and you’re asked about it, you need to know what the heck your book is about. Even if it is hard to pin down to a genre, you should be able to describe it without stuttering or babbling your way through. You, of all people, should know your work better than anyone else (even your editor, since said editor has a lot of other works to be familiar with from other authors). So, when you know you have an interview coming up, sit down and figure out how you are going to describe your work. If you’re really nervous, ask the interviewers if they can give you some questions ahead of time so you have an idea how things are going to work. No, that’s not asking for a lot. Remember, they want to talk to you, because it’s fun for them and good exposure for you. Tell good jokesA great way to break the ice is to tell a joke. In fact, it doesn’t have to be a good joke, in the sense of something hilarious, but maybe a clever anecdote, particularly about how you got published. Everyone has a funny story, clever anecdote, etc. So, if you have a funny story, tell it, and be funny and excited (sarcasm is good for you). If you have a horrible story about the publishing world and you want to tell it, I suggest making it cynical. Don’t just tell it straight out (unless it’s of particular interest in the now, such as some things that happened to Peter S. Beagle). Otherwise, use sarcasm and cynicism to your advantage. You don’t even have to be good at either. Listeners don’t expect you to be a Hollywood actor. Speak upToo many authors speak too quietly. This is sometimes linked to the first part of this list. Unless you’re of an advanced age, try not to speak really quiet. It makes you sound timid. You’re a published author! Speak at a good volume and clearly. We shouldn’t have to turn our sound all the way up to hear you, which is a big problem because the hosts of the show aren’t likely to turn down their vocals. Iron out the kinksIf you’re planning to do an interview over the net, try to make sure your computer can handle it. It’s best to test it out with a friend or something. Trust me, it’s really annoying when an author sounds like a robot in an interview. More often than not, it can be fixed. So, does anyone else have any interesting advice for writers doing audio interviews? Let’s hear your thoughts!
Well, another review is up. You can find it here. Good book and hopefully you all enjoy it as much as I did. Anywho! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)
I started writing a short story yesterday titled “The Erdluitles of New Timberfax”. But about half a page into the story I thought, “nobody ever writes about gnomes.” So, now, the title is “The Gnomes of New Timberfax” and it’s currently nothing more than a slightly humorous story about a hermit who discovers that gnomes are real and aren’t very fond of his neighbor. I have a feeling it will become slightly dark in the center, like a white-chocolate covered raisin. I’m not entirely sure if the city of New Timberfax is a magical city. The introduction of gnomes doesn’t necessarily mean I want the whole world to be a magical one, though on the one hand this does mean that magic, or at least magical creatures, exist.Needless to say, gnomes will be real and not exactly what one would expect of them (or at least that’s what I’m shooting for). We’ll see what happens. Anywho. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)