Dark Jenny Giveaway Winner
The winner is…drum roll please! Carraka Congrats, Carr! You’ll receive a PM from me shortly! Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go do this thing they call “homework.”
The winner is…drum roll please! Carraka Congrats, Carr! You’ll receive a PM from me shortly! Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m going to go do this thing they call “homework.”
I don’t have kids, but I can tell you this: if the child in the below video were mine, I would be so proud of her! Absolutely adorable, don’t you think?
It’s out and it’s semi-intense. This week we talk about upcoming movies, some stupid things being done to libraries, stupid male gamers, and some gender issues in the SF/F reviewing community. Feel free to check out the episode and let us know what you think. The question of the week will be up on Friday!
Sometimes I think people who post independent productions online, even if they are fake (like the video below), should be running Hollywood. I mean, who wouldn’t want to see a T.V. show based on the Harry Potter universe! I sure as hell would want to see The Aurors made real. Wouldn’t you? Here’s the video (after the fold): What did I tell you? Awesome, right?
It has a monster of a title, but it’s so geeky and wonderful you have to watch it. I love it when classical instrumentalists do their own renditions of video games. It shows immense respect for the source material (the music and the games) and it’s just plain old fun. Here’s the video (after the fold; pay attention to the middle bit — very clever): Awesome, no? Thanks for John Ottinger of Grasping for the Wind for the original discovery!
Another poll down with some very interesting results. Here’s what you all had to say: 50% of you said they will hurt authors. 0% of you said maybe. 50% of you said no. That’s a very interesting divide. People are very sure of themselves. I’m one of those sure people. I think the $0.99 ebook will hurt authors, but not because it will hurt publishers. My problem with the $0.99 ebook is that it limits the ability for authors to make a living off their work and further erodes the potential for midlist authors (however you want to define that category in this new digital age) to fit within that “living writers” group. Midlist authors have been well served by digital publishing, particularly as it pertains to self-publishing. Being able to make 70% on a $2.99 book means they make a lot more money than they would with some traditional publishers provided they maintain that “midlist” status. That’s a good thing. Let the big fellas handle the bestselling authors and let the smaller guys take their work to the digital stream to make a living too. Maybe the $0.99 ebook will prove beneficial for midlist authors. I certainly hope so. Their numbers might go up, they might end up making more money in the long run, and so on. But if not, what we’ll end up with is a new price-point that consumers will demand. There’s nothing wrong with a demand, but part of the reason for keeping ebooks reasonably priced (in both directions) is to set a standard for consumers that is good for everyone else too. I don’t much care for the agency model in terms of its implementation, but it does give publishers more control over their properties. Amazon’s ebook model gives many writers more control over theirs (sort of). All these models are useful, and need to be played with, manipulated, changed, and so on until we come up with something that is good for everyone. I don’t think the $0.99 ebook is necessarily a good thing for everyone. It’s good for a few, sure. Amanda Hocking and others are bringing in huge sales and money from using that model. But they are a minority that will always exist. The rest will have to contend with increasing their sales by quite a bit to reach the same monetary level as before. But, again, I could be very wrong. I hope I’m wrong. $0.99 ebooks are far more likely to sell than $7 ones. Let’s hope what is happening right now turns out for the best. What are your extended thoughts on this issue?