World in the Satin Bag

Reader Question: Vampires and Elves and Dwarves, Oh My!

(Yet again I have forgotten to write down who asked this question. If the person who asked sees this, let us know who you are in the comments.) Cliches in fantasy (and science fiction) seem to be a hot topic these days, what with urban fantasy paving the way towards over-saturation of the market, and science fiction apparently losing some of its appeal amongst certain groups of readers (though claims that science fiction is dying are premature at best). The question that has prompted this post asks a very important question: Should writers stay away from the cliches of fantasy? The kneejerk reaction should, for anyone, be “yes.” The problem with fantasy as a genre has always been its tendency to repeat itself to excess, with writers of talent essentially spouting rehashed Tolkien-esque stories and continuously mining Tolkien and the select few “original” authors that followed him for those staple creatures we have come to identity as clearly “fantasy”–elves, dwarves, dragons, etc. Urban fantasy has, unfortunately, been saturated with similar levels of repetition; vampires used to be fairly powerful creatures to insert into fantasy novels, but these days they are, for the most part, little more than furniture items without substance–if you want a better vampire, read the original Dracula. But kneejerk reactions are rarely efficient or proper. As in politics, immediately reacting to something without considering the larger picture is not only a bad idea, but dangerous. If you spend your days worrying yourself over whether or not you’re using a cliche, you’ll end up getting little done whatsoever. Writers should spend time writing, not considering the implications of using such-and-such creature or such-and-such trope. It’s quite impossible to avoid the cliches of the genre with any efficiency. Some may argue against this, but this is true of all fiction. No matter how hard you might try to write a truly original novel, you will most certainly fail. Cliches are a part of the human brain, and have been for a while. Certainly being aware of the cliches you’re using is important, but fretting over them is counterproductive. Instead, pay attention to how the cliches are used. Are you using elves in exactly the same way as Tolkien? Why? Injecting difference into the mix can help alleviate obvious repetition. Twist Tolkien’s elves on their head and see where it goes. Or, there’s always the more adequate method of dealing with cliches: write well. Nobody with any sense reads a well-written fantasy novel and says, “That is the most cliche thing I have ever read.” Good writing can, and does, completely change how a reader perceives a cliche. If you can tell a good story, then it is irrelevant how many cliches populate your fiction, because ultimately what the reader wants is a good reading experience–obviously. What do you think? Should writers avoid cliches? Why or why not? Feel free to leave a comment! ————————————————- If you have a question about science fiction, fantasy, writing, or anything related you’d like answered here, whether silly or serious, feel free to send it via email to arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com, tweet it via Twitter to @shaunduke, or leave it in the comments here. Questions are always welcome! If you liked this post, consider stumbling, digging, or linking to it!

World in the Satin Bag

40th Anniversary of the Moon Landing

Today is apparently the 40th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing. If that isn’t something worthy of mentioning on this blog, then I don’t know what is. Obviously I was not alive when this event occurred, but I have fond memories of watching live broadcasts of the shuttles heading off into space when I was a kid, and thus have the utmost respect for the fine folks who set foot, for the first time in human history, on the surface of our little moon. If you have forgotten their names, they are: Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins. Each had a part to play in getting mankind to the Moon and back, and thank goodness it was a success. As Armstrong said: That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind. The whole thing is pretty amazing, if you ask me. We might look back now and think of it as relatively trivial compared to our ridiculously technology-oriented lives, but Apollo 11 is to space and flight as the printing press is to books. NASA and Apollo 11 have played a crucial role in changing the United States and much of the world for the better. That’s something to acknowledge and be proud of.So, remember the day we put someone on the moon. It’s important. And to the fine men and women of NASA, I salute you! If you’re interested in learning more about this historic event, check out NASA’s webpage for the 40th anniversary. There are all sorts of goodies there.

World in the Satin Bag

Guest Posts Wanted (Again)

I’m moving to Florida in a couple weeks and am looking for a whole load of guest posts to keep things interesting around here while I’m on the road. What am I looking for? Anything discussing science fiction, fantasy, writing, or related subjects, whether it be a top 10 list or a rant about something happening in publishing. I’m not overly picky about subject matter. If you’d like to contribute a post or two, let me know here, via a Twitter message to @shaunduke, or via email at arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com. Thanks,Shaun

World in the Satin Bag

SF/F Links: Mid-July Links

Here we go: Futurismic has a really elaborate image that maps out the various scientific disciplines based on published papers, etc. It’s astonishing and hard to describe. Also at Futurismic is news that humans are naturally optimistic. Apparently a lot of people think things will get better. Dystopias are out! (Well, not really, but it’s fun to say, I suppose.) Wired lists 10 strange species discovered in 2008. And by strange, I really do mean strange. Ideas are already swimming in my head from this list. io9 lists 10 eco-catastrophes from early science fiction. Lots of stuff I’ve never read, and all interesting. I’m not sure I linked to this edition of Grasping For the Wind’s Inside the Blogosphere about relatively unknown SF/F authors. Good stuff there. NextRead asks: How do you choose what NOT to read next? SF Signal wonders what the dream price for eBooks is. Me too, actually. Personally, I think under $5 for new “mass market” editions (or at least 40% off cover price). That would make them appealing, I think. Theological Scribes asks why there are hardly any Christian science fiction tales. I think the better question is why there are hardly any Biblic retellings in science fiction format, because there are a heck of a lot of books that look at the future without necessarily violating a “Christian” worldview. Christopher Morris makes some interesting observations of NYT Bestseller’s lists from today and way back when. Funny how so much of what sells is genre fiction… Metaphysical Fantasy lists some subgenres of the fantasy genre with decent descriptions. A good list to acknowledge. Publetariat offers a pros/cons discussion of royalty-based indie publishing. Good stuff! John C. Wright wonders which science fiction and fantasy books we would read to our children. He goes into a great discussion of the various books he’s considered and tried, and even talks about Harry Potter in some detail. Great post. Jesse’s Blog makes some interesting observations about how we perceive the Other. Definitely worth reading if you’re interested in such discussions. The Launch Pad asks whether kids are reading enough science fiction these days. Good observations here and certainly a question that needs to be asked. Incredible Things has a list of twenty incredible bookcases. Simply stunning. And that’s it! Enjoy!

World in the Satin Bag

Top 7 Science Fiction “Sidekicks” (in Film)

Comic books may have the sidekick thing down, but science fiction has had a fair share of excellent sidekicks. This list is primarily focused on clear science fiction (in a loose sense and not based on my definitions here and here), so you won’t see any comic books or fantasy titles represented. Without further delay, here are what I consider to be the top seven: Chewbacca (Star Wars)I would argue that Chewbacca is the greatest science fiction sidekick in film history, but I’m sure those reading this will disagree. But, given that he’s a walking carpet with fangs, speaks in a bizarre grunting language that only Han Solo and Yoda seem to understand, and can pop the head off a grown man with his pinkie finger, I think he deserves to be here. Chewbacca is kind of like what a wolf would be like if it walked on two legs. Awesome? I think so. Spock (Star Trek)The only true rival to Chewbacca, in my opinion, Spock is sort of like the science fiction version of Legolas, only not nearly as cute. It would be hard to imagine Star Trek without Spock. What would Captain Kirk do without his half-human, half-vulcan, logic-spouting machine? He’d probably be dead and we wouldn’t be talking about the guy as if he were real. Spock is like Kirk’s exact opposite, and that seems to be why he functions so well as a character. Zoe (Firefly)There’s something astonishing about Zoe as a character. While some have criticized Whedon for making her a subservient woman, I see a strong, loyal female figure who follows Reynolds not because he’s a man, but because he is and always has been her superior in military rank. And she seems to know exactly how to put up with Reynold’s crap, like all good sidekicks should. Smart, witty, and damn good with a gun, Zoe is one of the best female sidekicks in science fiction history. Professor Arturo (Sliders)John Rhys Davies is amazing. If that isn’t enough to put Professor Arturo on this list, then consider that Arturo was, by far, the best character on the show, so much so that his death drove the quality of Sliders right into the garbage bin. Arturo was smart, opinionated, and yet strangely lovable. His death was a shock for a damned good reason. Starbuck (Battlestar Galactica, the new version)Some may argue with me about whether Starbuck qualifies as a sidekick, but she needs to be on this list due to how awesome of a character she was in the re-imagined Battlestar Galactica. Not only is she a hell of a pilot and a bit of a badass, but Starbuck also has a remarkable fate that leads her on an emotional roller coaster to discover Earth. Watch the show and you’ll understand why she’s awesome. Al Calavicci (Quantum Leap)I wonder what it would be like to have a holographic projection of my best friend following me around as I’m thrust through time into other people’s bodies. Would it be fun? Maybe. If Al were following me, though, I suspect it would be an interesting journey. This show is one of my Grandmother’s favorites, and I can see why. Al is a fun character played by and equally fun actor (Dean Stockwell, who actually plays Caval on Battlestar Galactica). Dana Scully (X-Files)Last of this list is another character who might not be considered to be a sidekick. Scully has a remarkable independent attitude in the series, but makes it on this list primarily because she does act as a logic machine for Mulder–sort of like Spock does for Kirk. She knows how to deal with dead bodies, gets abducted by aliens, and sees a heck of a lot of strange stuff, but still manages to be a disbeliever right up until two steps from the end. That takes guts. And there you have it. Anyone you disagree with? Who would you replace and why? Let me know in the comments!

World in the Satin Bag

Science Fiction Withdrawals (or How to Survive When Your Favorite Series Ends)

Battlestar Galactica is over, and it’s not the first of its kind–i.e. a great show–that has come to a grinding halt, leaving fans with nothing to fill the void. Oh, sure, when BSG ended we had loads of science fiction shows: Dollhouse, Fringe, Knight Rider, Life On Mars, Kings, Primeval, and a whole bunch of other shows either debuting or continuing in 2009. Hell, half of the shows mentioned were cancelled this year, leaving slim pickings in the science fiction department (and I use that term quite loosely to talk about television). Often the same thing happens within literature, with great series coming to an end, and few good replacements left in the mix (of course, this is far more common in fantasy than in science fiction–think Harry Potter and the void it left). What are we science fiction fans supposed to do? An even greater question is: What are we picky science fiction fans supposed to do? I never liked Dollhouse, and most of the other shows either lacked that spine-tingling anticipation garnering effect that BSG so easily produced or were downright terrible, which explains why a lot of them are no longer on the air. Do we just wait for the next big thing? And how are we to survive in the interim? I’ve found that a great way to survive is to start watching reruns. After all, sometimes it’s a good idea to go back to a show you liked so many years ago as a refresher. A truly good show is re-watchable, and if said show is particularly amazing, re-watching will create a whole new experience. Of course, if you’re as picky as I am, that means you’ll re-watch the same show over and over and over again, because it can sometimes take five or six years for something worthwhile to come along. The last time I religiously watched television was during the fourth season of BSG (because I got into the series quite late). Still, watching reruns is a great way to keep your brain entertained while searching for something new to replace the void. I don’t know how well this works for books, though. I have reread 1984 a handful of times, but that was more for my own curiosity than anything else. But reruns are a temporary fix for science fiction withdrawals. Inevitably science fiction fans have to find something to truly fill that void. Personally, this is a problem for me primarily because I am too picky. I don’t like most television shows, and getting my science fiction fix, especially in the ridiculous market we have now where channels that are supposed to play science fiction play something else, is next to impossible. Perhaps BSG is a fluke, or perhaps brilliant shows only come along once every few years. I find that the only way I can survive is to go on a science fiction movie binge; I fill my brain with Total Recall and I, Robot, and Sliders too. Sometimes I have to go outside of the genre to get the storytelling that I so desire–Band of Brothers, for example, is particularly good. Survival, it seems, depends on trying to keep yourself occupied with things you already love until such time as something new can come along to fill the space with shiny things. How do you survive? What do you do to fill the void? Do you have a few tricks up your sleeve? Let me know in the comments!

Scroll to Top