World in the Satin Bag

SF/F Links: More April Goodies

Here are a few more lovely links for you all! LocusMag has an article on why science fiction fails to predict the future.  Some interesting points made here. Here are some really pretty moleskine drawing things.  Definitely worth a look if you like nifty fantasy artwork and moleskines. Speculative Fiction, Damaged Genre?  I don’t know if I completely agree, but it’s and interesting point of view. This is not exactly the best or most accurate list of subgenres I have ever seen (and not just in science fiction, but in all genres).  Actually, I can’t say this is a good list at all.  It’s blaringly obvious the writer doesn’t really know what he or she is talking about… Jim C. Hines talks about writing rape scenes.  Interesting stuff, if you’re curious about a writer’s perspective on the subject. Giveaways: Shhh I’m Reading has two copies of The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane up for grabs. Jenn’s Bookshelf has a whole bunch of audiobooks up for grabs. And that’s it!

World in the Satin Bag

Sometimes Your Writing Just Sucks

And sometimes there’s nothing you can do to fix it. Mur Lafferty had a post some time ago about tough love and there was one thing she said that I have to disagree with: My point is that if you write a book, and you can’t get it published, it doesn’t mean the dream is over. It doesn’t mean that you as a writer suck. It means that book wasn’t attractive to agents/editors. It means that perhaps you need to improve as a writer, see your first book as an exercise to make yourself a better writer. Or it means that you actually suck. I have no problem with encouraging people to continue, to push on and never give up on their dreams, but sometimes some people really should give up on their dreams. This isn’t just to save all of us out there from having to deal with them; it’s also to save them from the humiliation of constant failure and ridicule. While writing this, I’m thinking about all those examples on American Idol where someone with a vision, with an immense dream comes up against Simon (and sometimes Paula and Randy) and has to face the reality that they are not good enough. Sometimes these failed people throw a fit, proclaiming that they are the greatest thing since sliced bread, and other times they break down entirely, feeling the immense pain of not rejection, but absolute and total internal destruction. And I’m also thinking of those folks in the writing world that you meet from time to time that truly believe their self-published novel is really amazing, when in actuality it’s one of the worst things ever put into print. These are the folks who cannot take constructive advice, who won’t change or get better either because they can’t or because they won’t. These are the folks that don’t need encouraging, because they get enough of it from friends and family that don’t have the heart to tell them that they are horrible. But how do writers know if they really do suck? How do we know when it’s time to throw in the towel and stop, because writing really isn’t our thing? I don’t know. I don’t think anyone can really know, but I still take issue with this idea that one shouldn’t re-evaluate themselves if they meet complete failure at the hands of publishers. I still feel like we should be careful to encourage people to self-publish, because often times the folks who do so don’t realize what they are getting themselves into. Sometimes your novel just isn’t good enough to get published. And that’s okay. Really. It’s okay for your novel to not be good enough. We call those trunk novels (or stories, for that matter). Sometimes your dream project can be let go. I’ve let projects go. I’ve had to. I got to a point where I had moved so far from something that it wasn’t worth keeping it alive just to feed that part of me that wanted it to succeed. I could find new things that could fill that void. Not everything you write will get published. That’s the honest truth. Sometimes your stories or novels can be put in the trunk and left there, maybe forever, or maybe long enough for you to get enough distance to see what was wrong with it in the first place. The reality is that sometimes your writing does suck. Sometimes your novel, story, etc. sucks beyond measure. In fact, this is true almost every time. If you get rejected from every editor and agent in the business, maybe you should really think twice before self-publishing, or podcasting, or whatever. Maybe your novel actually is horrible. It happens. A lot. And it’s okay. Write something else. Try again. When people talk about persistence being the key to success, this is what they mean. Don’t throw up your hands and say, “Well, I couldn’t get X, Y, and Z to take it, so I’ll just have to self-publish!” Write something else, submit, and keep trying if you honestly believe you have the talent. How many writers in history have trunked a novel only to have it published later after selling something else? Quite a few. If you really do have the talent, you can get published. You just have to keep going. This is why I have such a problem with self-publishing (podcasting included). It’s easy. Really easy. All one has to do is waltz on over to Lulu, format a document, and submit. Maybe that ease of access is a bad thing. And it’s not helping self-publishing gain any respect in the world when folks who didn’t give up when they should pay for a publishing package or go through Lulu. Sometimes you just suck. And nothing you do can fix that. Never assume that you will get lucky like the handful of self-pubbed people that have made it “big” (and not even that big, to be honest, since I have yet to hear of any self-pubbed author who has shattered records). There’s no such thing as luck in the writing world. There is only talent and persistence (and a few other things that I can’t remember right now). What does anyone else think about this? P.S.: Yes, I am fully aware that technically I have self-published WISB. The only difference is that I never intended to sell WISB. Not really. It was an experiment that I truly enjoyed and want to keep going not because I want it to make me famous or for it to get into print format, but because it brings me joy. It wasn’t rejected from publishers, nor would I send it to them. I have other work that I submit and I’m not giving up on that stuff so long as there is somewhere to send it!

World in the Satin Bag

Rejection: Artemis

The good news is that this was a good rejection.  I know what you’re thinking:  A good rejection?  It’s one of those where the editors actually give you valuable feedback not because they have to, but because they think you either have potential, or at least got lucky enough to seem like you have potential.  That’s what happened here. In any case, for now it’s off somewhere else.  

World in the Satin Bag

Rejection (sort of): Nobody Gives a Crap About Compsagnathus

Okay, so technically this piece wasn’t rejected.  Why?  Because the press I sent it to is apparently closing their doors.  No, it’s not my fault.  I blame Bush, as should you all.  In fact, any time you get rejected and don’t like it, blame Bush.  Trust me, it will make you feel better inside. In any case, this piece is off to some other lovely place, which will hopefully remain open long enough for my story to actually be read! Anywho!

World in the Satin Bag

SF/F Links: April April April

Nothing like a few more links to make you grin with joy, right? This time I have quite a few really interesting ones, which isn’t to say that the ones I had put up in previous posts weren’t interesting. I’m just trying to make you more excited about these particular links. Here goes: Vandonovan presents possibly one of the worst examples of purple prose ever thrust onto the public.  To make it more entertaining, though, there is fanart (make sure to scroll down for the link, because it’s hilarious). Robert J. Sawyer has some interesting answers to questions about technology (meant for a Turkish newspaper/magazine apparently). Thoughts By Ted asks whether it is ethical to pirate the e-text of a book he already owns for travel convenience (so he doesn’t have to lug the dead tree book around).  What do you think? A really awesomely detailed diagram of a sailing ship from back in the day. Check out the website for a new alternate history movie in which Nazis fled to the moon and then came back to fulfill Hitler’s mission! Discovery has a story about a computer called MEXICA that actually writers fiction stories.  I don’t know how good they are, but that’s pretty cool in my book! Here is an interesting chart called the Trilogy Meter, showing (I think) the relationship between the different parts of various famous movie trilogies based on popularity and rating.  It’s simple, so don’t be overwhelmed. Scientists studying the human brain and its reactions to the process of reading have made some fascinating discoveries, particularly this one that suggests that we create simulations within our minds of the world presented within a story (not necessarily a fantasy story, but any story). Here’s an interesting post defending readers.  It talks a lot about the solitary experience that is reading.  I have no idea who the author is defending readers against, but so be it. Elizabeth Willse asks “What Makes Good Fantasy?”  Well, what do you think makes good fantasy? I’ll have more links later on.  For now, this is it!  Anywho!

World in the Satin Bag

Quick Movie Reviews (2009): Volume Four

And here are some more quick reviews from GeorgeMichael. Okay, so only the first four are from him, but still. He’s apparently seen a lot of movies this year. As have I! Anywho, enjoy: Bride WarsPros:  Both Anne Hathaway and Kate Hudson are great actors who do their very best with the mediocre script that they’ve been handed. Their performances are the highlight of this otherwise disposable movie in which two best friends get their weddings planned on the same day in the same place and fight with everything they can to ensure that their own wedding wins out. Let theoretical hilarity ensue.Cons:  It’s not funny and it’s not romantic. Anything that you could possibly want in a rom/com is completely absent here. You have a two hour long catfight for sure but it’s all loosely wound by a poorly written script and horrible execution.Rating:   1.5/5 I Love You, ManPros:  Paul Rudd and Jason Segel give amazing performances as Peter and Sidney in the most recent bro-mance for all to enjoy. The premise surrounds Peter getting engaged and realizingthat he doesn’t have a best man so as a result he begins his search for male bonding. The script is amazing and the movie works flawlessly. Paul Rudd is great as the awkward “only had girl friends” guy who gets nervous around Sidney when he tries to be cool. Jason Segel is equally impressive as the yin to Paul’s yang as the outgoing party dude.Cons:  Like many Apatow-like movies (he has nothing to do with this particular film) the movie runs a tad too long but other than that it is an amazing movie that is easily worth double the price of the admission ticket.Rating:  4.5/5 Last Chance HarveyPros:  Dustin Hoffman and Emma Thompson give great performances in this substantial feel good film. Harvey (Dent… he he…) is a commercial jingle composer who travels to England for his daughter’s wedding and everything goes wrong. First he finds out that he has been left at a hotel all alone because his entire family are staying at a house that his ex wife rented out. Then his daughter tells him that she wants her step father to walk her down the aisle. To place a cherry on top of it all he gets fired. While sulking at a bar he comes across a delightful woman in misery named Kate. The feel goodiness begins.Cons:  The movie moves a little slow at times and can drag in certain places. It plays the plot safe for the most part and in any other instance would be a pretty general feel good movie. What elevate Last Chance Harvey above the rest are the superb performances of Hoffman and Thompson.Rating:   4/5 Slumdog MillionairePros:  A perfect love story set in the slums of India that tells the tale of Jumal Malik as he searches his whole life looking for the girl that he lost as a child, Latika. The movie is perfectly cast, directed, written, and shot. To add to all of that the movie has amazing music to go along for the ride. A movie that opens with the main character being tortured turns into one of the happiest and greatest movies in recent years. Who knew?Cons:  A perfect love story. There are no cons. All Oscars were deserved.Rating:   5/5 Sex DrivePros: A couple hilarious moments, but really this is sort of a typical teen comedy/romance. Not much else to say, unfortunately.Cons: The best moments were the ones we already saw in the previews. The Amish scenes were mediocre at best and the plot was pretty much an idiotic “I’m a teenage virgin male and I need to get laid” rehash. Basically it’s unoriginal and overdone. We need more interesting teenage comedies…Rating: 1/5 And there you go!

Scroll to Top