SF/F Commentary

SF/F Commentary

Movie Review: Tron: Legacy (A Brief Review)

And by brief, I mean really brief.  I’m currently working on a late review for Strange Horizons, which will be my take on the worldbuilding.  However, since I quite enjoyed the film, I wanted you all to have my scores for the various aspect of the films, which I usually do at the end of every review.  I’ll post a very brief explanation under each. Directing: 3/5 Kosinski gets okay performances out of the cast, but his new director shoes are definitely showing.  I hope his work on The Black Hole remake is better (the same guy who wrote The Clash of the Titans is attached to the project, though, so I don’t have high hopes).  It would suck something awful to remake a classic and give us, well, room temperature scifi water.  He’s not a terrible director, like Uwe Boll, but hopefully we’ll see improvement from here on out. Cast: 3.5/5 The case is decent.  Bridges is not at his best, but nobody is awful in this movie.  That’s a plus.  It’s not bad casting, but they’re not used well.  The fellow behind Castor is brilliant, though, even if he is insanely eccentric. Writing: 3.75/5 Yes, the plot is simple, but since worldbuilding is a part of the writing, they get a huge bump up for creating a really brilliant world, and a plot that actually makes sense.  Simple may not be what people want, but it’s better than creating an overcomplicated mess.  Legacy isn’t a mess.  It’s logical.  All of it. Visuals: 4.75/5 Overall, the visuals are amazing.  They’ve done a fine job weaving the world together.  The only flaw I think is worth mentioning is that sometimes young Bridges looks a little too computerized.  They’re still impressive effects in general, but there are moments where things aren’t where they should be. Adaptation: N/A It’s not an adaptation of anything, per se. Overall: 3.75/5 Value: $9.75 (based on a $10.50 max)(this number is based on movie ticket value) I loved the film.  I’d recommend science fiction fans to see it with the intention of watching a fun movie.  Don’t go into this expecting Inception or Sunshine.  It’s good cyberpunk fun!

SF/F Commentary

The Anime/Manga Adaptation Invasion: Why We Love It and Why It’s Here to Stay

The anime/manga-invasion has been building for the last twenty years.  With live-action films for Death Note, Dragonball, Speed Racer, Transformers (not anime; Jordan Lapp has destroyed my childhood), and over forty other adaptations behind us, and at least a dozen others (U.S. and Japan based) on the way, it seems like anime and manga have a stranglehold on the film and television market.  Of course, both have been hot commodities in the U.S. for several decades.  There has been significant growth in the last ten to fifteen years alone with the syndication and dubbing of dozens of anime franchises, many crossed over directly from popular manga in Japan.  One might even suggest that the last ten years have been the Japanese equivalent of a film renaissance. One of the best adaptations, despite the silly special effects. The best thing about the invasion is that it’s just getting started.  The next two years are looking to be some of the biggest for anime/manga live-action adaptations.  What’s coming?  How about half of the top ten most influential and/or popular anime productions ever made (for U.S. audiences, at least):  Ghost in the Shell, Cowboy Bebop, Neon Genesis Evangelion, and Akira.  Plus, you can’t forget the recent release in Japan of the live-action adaptation of Space Battleship Yamato (known as Star Blazers to U.S. viewers), which–we can only hope–will get a decent release in the U.S. so we don’t have to wait for bootlegs to hit the torrent sites or $30 DVD sets with poor subtitle production to hit shelves.  Yamato looks like the kind of film you need to see on a massive screen with decent theater audio–one might say that it has “epic” written all over it. The best live action adaptation ever?  Let’s hope! But what it is about anime–specifically, live-action adaptations–that has America in a furor for more properties to push out into the market (I won’t speak for Japan, since I have very little personal connection with Japanese culture)?  Even if most of us have never intentionally watched an anime program, or have never become interested enough in anime to step beyond the traditional fair that appears on cable and regular network television, we still support anime programs and anime productions.  The two Transformers movies, regardless of their critical reception, were massively successful in the U.S. (again, not anime…)…Original anime productions–most of them by Hayao Miyazaki–have and will continue to capture audiences for years to come.  While it’s true that other franchises, such as Speed Racer, have not faired well among U.S. viewers, many of those franchises didn’t have much of a shot in the first place.  Speed Racer, while based on a classic, suffered from a number of problems, the most important being that its target demographic (young people) simply didn’t match up to who the show originally appealed to (folks who used to be young in the 60s)–not to mention that the original television show hasn’t been updated since it originally aired, unlike other franchises that have received movie adaptations.  You can’t expect to connect with the largest demographic with a program that young folks largely identify as “that old crap my parents used to watch.” Oh silly people and their cars… Speed Racer, however, is likely a fluke, since most of the upcoming adaptations are of franchises that will translate well to live-action even if the source material has never been viewed by the target audience.  Ghost in the Shell will be, we can hope, a deeply psychological look into identity in a drastically posthuman world; Akira will have a similar psychological framework, but focused on the conflicts of power and the people who want to control it.  And there are others:  Cowboy Bebop, Voltron, Full Metal Panic, Bubblegum Crisis, Gatchaman, Battle Angel, Gantz, and so on.  What most of these share–and what makes anime a great medium to adapt into live action feature films–are a collection of counter-inhibitions–features that make anime a love it or hate it medium in its pure form, but also seem to make live-action anime adaptations work well for U.S. audiences. An Unrelenting Orientation Towards Action. Anime and manga often don’t pull punches on the action, letting high-powered weaponry or magic control the scene.  This is in stark contrast to U.S. films, which, while over-the-top at times, are often focused on the effects of combat, rather than the combat itself (i.e. explosions).  In anime, however, power is visible.  Dragonball Z often went a little overboard with its action, dragging out battles for five or six episodes, but it also showed us action at its most flamboyant. Uninhibited Ideas American audiences might be surprised to know that a lot of the anime that makes it to our TV screens has actually been watered down for our audiences.  That might not be so true for the stuff that shows up on late night cable, but the popular shows on Saturday morning or in the afternoon have often had their questionable content removed.  Anime, thus, tends to go places where traditional western television is unwilling (except in indie stuff and late night British TV).  Sociology would suggest that this has to do with the absence of western-style theology in the Japanese sphere, since a great deal of Japanese people are not “religious” in a traditional sense.  In any case, so many great anime are not afraid to go into the darkest, dirtiest, and awful places of human potential.  But they also dig deep into the human mind, sometimes in the most beautiful ways (like in Gasaraki, which is both dark and beautiful at the same time). Romantic Tension and Emotional Hypersensitity This may be a strictly Japanese thing, but one of the aspects I most appreciate about anime is how they often create an extraordinary amount of romantic tension that, often times, doesn’t get fully resolved, or, if it does, it’s expected, but still an enormous relief (like in Saikano).  Great anime, however, do this by presenting enormously complex and flawed characters torn by conflicting emotions.  Romances in science fiction anime

SF/F Commentary

Promo Bits: Gantz (Live Action Film) Premieres on the Jan. 20th,2011!

I recently received an email about this event and decided that, since I’m planning to go, you all should know about it so you can go too. Here’s the info (after the fold): There are a lot of really sexy people in this movie, by the way… You’ve watched the series, you’ve read the manga and for one night on Thursday, January 20 you can see the GANTZ live-action World Premiere on the big screen. NCM Fathom and NEW PEOPLE invite you to your local movie theatre for the GANTZ LIVE event. Follow characters Kei Kurono and Masaru Kato on their mysterious posthumous mission to eradicate an alien species bent on destroying Earth. On January 20, find out if the players of this ultimate survival game can save the world and revive themselves. What were originally stunning illustrations translate into explosive action delivered in 5.1 surround sound. GANTZ will be English over-dubbed exclusively for this one night event. Kazunari Ninomiya and Kenichi Matsuyama, the popular Japanese actors who play Kurono and Kato, will participate in an exclusive live interview following the feature. This Q&A is exclusive to GANTZ theatre audiences nationwide. Tickets are on sale now. Check out www.fathomevents.com to learn more about GANTZ, find a list of participating theatres near you and purchase tickets. I haven’t seen all of the animated series, but I do recall the first few episodes being quite good.  You can find out if a theater near you is participating here. So who’s going?

SF/F Commentary

Top 10 Blog Posts in 2010 and from 2010 (Because They’re Different)

I’ve been tweeting my top ten most popular posts in 2010 and it occurred to me that maybe I should put that list here, along with a list of the most popular posts written in 2010, since the lists are actually quite different.  So, here goes: Top 10 Blog Posts in 2010 Top 8 Most Ridiculous Moments in Science Fiction and Fantasy Film in the 21st Century Werewolves and Misconceptions About Science Fiction Top 10 Cats in Science Fiction and Fantasy Top Ten Fantasy Movies Misconceptions About Star Wars Movie Review:  Star Trek (Why It Sucks and Why Abrams Needs to Stop) Top 10 Most Ridiculous Moments in Science Fiction and Fantasy Film in the 90s What If Dragons Were Real? Top 7 Fiercest Dragons J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek:  An Addendum (to my review) I suspect that a lot of these views have been from old links or images, since a great deal of the posts above are at least a year old.  Still, it’s interesting to see what is getting the most attention this year. Top 10 Blog Post from 2010 (Note:  Google Analytics stopped working at around the time that I updated the blog, so the list below is based on post statistics that I have available to me–half from Google Analytics and half from Blogger’s new Stats feature, which doesn’t let me see deep enough to focus on content written in 2010.  Some of my selections are guesses based on data I have and the number of comments received.) Top 8 Most Ridiculous Moments in Science Fiction and Fantasy Film in the 21st Century Top 10 Most Ridiculous Moments in Science Fiction and Fantasy Film in the 90s J.J. Abrams’ Star Trek:  An Addendum (to my review) Fiction Narratives:  The Forgotten Strand? A Brief Linking to the Manifesto of No-Consequence Why Science Fiction is Important to the Third World (Part One) The Book Habits Meme (Reboot) Movie Review:  Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part One) Haiti and Pat Robertson:  Slavery is A-OK Self-Publishing Lies and Myths:  Deception and Unethical Practices The differences between these two lists are pretty obvious.  The former is largely comprised of lists, which seems to prove that such things are traffic producers (which I’ve read is true, but have never done for the purposes of getting traffic, with the exception of #2 in list two).  I don’t know what to make of that.  I only do top # lists because they’re fun, and it’s starting to feel as though I’ve covered most of the topics that are reasonable enough to do.  But maybe new idea will spring up in 2011?  Who knows? Now the big question is this:  what are your favorite posts of 2010?

SF/F Commentary

A Quick Note: The Silence and Caribbean Science Fiction

Readers of the blog will have noticed my silence for the last week and a half (with the exception of a handful of posts).  This is entirely intentional, and I think you all deserve an explanation. The reason:  I am working on my MA Thesis at this very moment (draft #1), which is due at 11:59 (and 59s) PM on the 31st (less than two days now).  Needless to say, it has been excruciatingly difficult.  I do expect to return on the 1st.  No joke.  I have posts.  I will be posting.  That’s two more days.  You can handle that, right? For those curious about the about-ness of this paper, you’ll be pleased to know that I’m going to bore you with my rough abstract for the Eaton Conference, which I will be presenting at in February of next year: Caribbean speculative fiction has historically been primarily occupied with the fantastic—magical realism, folklore, and fantasy—with traditional elements of science fiction—advanced technology, space travel, etc.—mostly left to developed and developing nations, such as the United States, India, China, and some nations of the Latin American mainland. Careful study will show that this has little to do with disinterest on the part of Caribbean nations in matters of technology or space; in fact, a great number of Caribbean governments have played a part in the ratification of a number of United Nations amendments related to the space industry. There are exceptions, mostly notably in Cuba, which has a strong science fiction community that has gone largely unnoticed by Western mainstream audiences. Yet the Caribbean has found a strong voice in the science fiction works of Tobias S. Buckell and Nalo Hopkinson, both Caribbean-born writers who have secured their places in a now rising multicultural shift in Western science fiction—a movement split between the increased mainstream interest in “World SF” and the inclusion of non-Western settings and characters within mainstream SF itself. What is most striking about the inclusion of Caribbean views within Western SF is that many of the authors are expatriates, and this is particularly relevant when discussing the works of Buckell and Hopkinson. Both authors have imagined futures in which the Caribbean not only has a presence in space, but is also an active participant in the colonization of other planets. These futures reflect a modern Caribbean consciousness in which identity is complicated by the postcolonial situation, the problematic nature of expatriation, and the fracturing (or merging/creolization) of cultures; this reflection, however, is relayed through a space-oriented setting where Caribbean characters and cultures have coalesced and established themselves outside of the traditional postcolonial situation, and outer space itself becomes an object through which postcolonialism and its predecessor are combated or rendered mute, thus allowing for the formation of an identity that is not predicated upon an un-chosen past. In this paper I will analyze and discuss how Tobias S. Buckell’s trilogy of science fiction novels and Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robbers, along with some of her short stories, present outer space as an answer to the issue of “space” and cultural ownership within the Caribbean context. These writers, I will argue, imagine futures in which outer space is both an answer to the postcolonial situation in the Caribbean and a “space,” in the general sense, that is part liberatory and part identity-forming. And that’s that…

Scroll to Top