SF/F Commentary

SF/F Commentary

Haul of Books 2010: Stuff For Me v.21

Last month I went to Books-a-Million to use a coupon I received for being a member.  The cool thing about Books-a-Million is that they have so many good books for good prices, that it’s almost impossible to not spend money while you’re there.  That’s why I only go every few months… In any case, the following books are half of the books I bought while I was there.  The price tags are not the price I paid for all of these books, though.  Coupons are wonderful things! Here goes: And here are the descriptions, from left to right, top to bottom (taken from Amazon.com): 1.  Regenesis by C. J. Cherryh The direct sequel to the Hugo Award- winning novel Cyteen, Regenesis continues the story of Ariane Emory PR, the genetic clone of one of the greatest scientists humanity has ever produced, and of her search for the murderer of her progenitor—the original Ariane Emory. Murder, politics, deception, and genetic and psychological manipulation combine against a backdrop of interstellar human societies at odds to create a mesmerizing and major work in Regenesis. Who did kill the original Ariane Emory? And can her personal replicate avoid the same fate? Those questions have remained unanswered for two decades—since the publication of Cyteen. Now in Regenesis those questions will finally be answered. 2.  Anathem by Neal Stephenson Anathem, the latest invention by the New York Times bestselling author of Cryptonomicon and The Baroque Cycle, is a magnificent creation: a work of great scope, intelligence, and imagination that ushers readers into a recognizable — yet strangely inverted — world. Fraa Erasmas is a young avout living in the Concent of Saunt Edhar, a sanctuary for mathematicians, scientists, and philosophers, protected from the corrupting influences of the outside “saecular” world by ancient stone, honored traditions, and complex rituals. Over the centuries, cities and governments have risen and fallen beyond the concent’s walls. Three times during history’s darkest epochs violence born of superstition and ignorance has invaded and devastated the cloistered mathic community. Yet the avout have always managed to adapt in the wake of catastrophe, becoming out of necessity even more austere and less dependent on technology and material things. And Erasmas has no fear of the outside — the Extramuros — for the last of the terrible times was long, long ago. Now, in celebration of the week-long, once-in-a-decade rite of Apert, the fraas and suurs prepare to venture beyond the concent’s gates — at the same time opening them wide to welcome the curious “extras” in. During his first Apert as a fraa, Erasmas eagerly anticipates reconnecting with the landmarks and family he hasn’t seen since he was “collected.” But before the week is out, both the existence he abandoned and the one he embraced will stand poised on the brink of cataclysmic change. Powerful unforeseen forces jeopardize the peaceful stability of mathic life and the established ennui of the Extramuros — a threat that only an unsteady alliance of saecular and avout can oppose — as, one by one, Erasmas and his colleagues, teachers, and friends are summoned forth from the safety of the concent in hopes of warding off global disaster. Suddenly burdened with a staggering responsibility, Erasmas finds himself a major player in a drama that will determine the future of his world — as he sets out on an extraordinary odyssey that will carry him to the most dangerous, inhospitable corners of the planet . . . and beyond. 3.  Why Evolution is True by Jerry A. Coyne In the current debate about creationism and intelligent design, there is an element of the controversy that is rarely mentioned-the evidence. Yet the proof of evolution by natural selection is vast, varied, and magnificent. In this succinct and accessible summary of the facts supporting the theory of natural selection, Jerry A. Coyne dispels common misunderstandings and fears about evolution and clearly confirms the scientific truth that supports this amazing process of change. Weaving together the many threads of modern work in genetics, paleontology, geology, molecular biology, and anatomy that demonstrate the “indelible stamp” of the processes first proposed by Darwin, Why Evolution Is True does not aim to prove creationism wrong. Rather, by using irrefutable evidence, it sets out to prove evolution right. 4.  Mariah Mundi:  The Midas Box by G. P. Taylor A new spine-tingling adventure by the author of Shadowmancer. The Prince Regent is no ordinary hotel—powered entirely by steam, run by an eccentric inventor who doesn’t believe in sleep, it’s a place full of shadowy characters and dangerous secrets. Mariah has just started working there as a magician’s assistant, and when he and his coworker Sacha unwittingly learn more than they were meant to know, they suddenly find themselves pawns in an evil plot so full of twists and turns that even the labyrinth of hidden tunnels and caverns beneath the hotel can’t contain it. As they struggle to unravel the mystery and stay alive in the process, encountering secret rooms, enchanted objects and vicious mythical creatures, they question whom to trust. All the adults—even the ones offering help—seem to be hiding something. After all, Mariah only got his job because his predecessor vanished one night—and, as Mariah is fast realizing, not all magic tricks are illusions. 5.  The Quiet War by Paul McAuley Twenty-third century Earth, ravaged by climate change, looks backwards to the holy ideal of a pre-industrial Eden. Political power has been grabbed by a few powerful families and their green saints. Millions of people are imprisoned in teeming cities; millions more labour on Pharaonicpre-emptive action against the Outers before it’s too late; others want to exploit the talents of their scientists and gene wizards.Amid campaigns for peace and reconciliation, political machinations, crude displays of military might, and espionage by cunningly wrought agents, the two branches of humanity edge towards war… 6.  Leven Thumps and the Wrath of Ezra by Obert Skye The dreams of mankind are in grave danger. The Dearth, the true evil

SF/F Commentary

A Blogger Interview from Of Blog of the Fallen

Larry over at OF Blog of the Fallen has posted a long list of questions for book bloggers.  I thought they were interesting enough to post about here, so that’s what I’m doing.  Larry seems interested in getting a lot of responses, so if you are a blogger, whether about books or otherwise, you should participate.  Answer the questions on your blog and post your link in the comments. (Note:  Apparently Larry posted these questions as a spoof of sorts.  I took it seriously when I wrote these answers, though, and so should you.) Here goes: 1. Without giving anything away, what can you tell readers about your blog? The World in the Satin Bag is a science fiction and fantasy oriented blog, ranging from discussions and rants about various issues in the genre fiction world, book and movie reviews (sometimes in-depth, sometimes not), and anything else that strikes my fancy.  I’ve recently been talking about the New Weird and Scifi Strange “phenomenon.” Some have called my blog “serious.”  I like to think that WISB is a mixture. (On a ridiculous side note:  isn’t the point of telling people about your blog to give something away?  Or is there a specific thing I’m not supposed to give away about The World in the Satin Bag?  If I’m not allowed to give anything away, then I can’t even say that my blog is a blog, because that is already giving the reader something by which to develop an expectation.) 2. What can you tell readers about your future themed review months? Are there any sequels in the works? I don’t have any themed review months, so I can’t tell my readers or anyone’s readers about such things.  I review what comes to me, what interests me, and so on.  All I can really say is that you shouldn’t expect my reviews to be non-genre oriented. 3. What do you feel is your strength as a blogger/reviewer? I’m going to approach this from two different positions:  one that is egotistical and one that is objective. Objective strength:  I’d probably have to say my dedication to blogging and reviewing.  I’ve been blogging for four years as of Sept. 3rd, with over 1,500 published posts.  That evens out to about a post a day.  I don’t know how many people can say the same, since there aren’t a lot of statistics on these kinds of things.  Regardless, the fact that I have been doing this for so long seems to be paying off for me personally; I’ve improved drastically over the years (look back to the oldest posts on this blog and you’ll see how true that really is). Egotistical strength:  I consider myself to be a pretty strong thinker and critic, particularly in the last year.  I’m not right all the time, but I am quite pleased with many of my critical posts on this blog (such as my writing on Inception or even my more recent discussions on New Weird and Scifi Strange).  To be fair, though, this isn’t a strength that I think is unique.  There are quite a few bloggers out there who take a critical approach to their posts. 4. If you could go back in time, what advice would you give the younger you concerning your blogging/reviewing career? Do what you love.  It’s not advice that I wasn’t already attempting to fulfill, but I would likely tell my younger self to remember to keep the blog about what I love.  I wouldn’t try to change what I’ve already done, for the most part, because I think failing and succeeding is a better way to learn how to be a good blogger/writer/etc. than reading about it on the Internet (though you can get a few good ideas from there). 5. What was the spark that generated the idea that drove you to start your blog/reviewing career? I actually began The World in the Satin Bag as a fiction experiment.  In Sept. of 2006 I had the idea to use a blog to try to finish my first novel (which this blog is named after).  The first chapter went up on Sept. 17, 2006 and ran for thirty-one chapters, ending on Sept. 2, 2007.  I used the blog to talk about books, reading, writing, and things related to genre while writing the book, and then converted the blog to a heavily genre-oriented discussion/criticism/review/rant blog.  The rest is history.  That’s pretty much what started everything.  I had no idea that, four years later, I would be where I am now.  Then again, most people don’t know what the future holds for them, right? The entire novel is still available to read on this blog, in case anyone cares, but it is old and something I’ve preserved here for fun. 6. Were there any perceived conventions of blogging/reviewing that you wanted to twist or break when you set out to start blogging/reviewing? Honestly, no, but not because I was interested in parroting everyone else.  When I started blogging, I had no idea what blogging was.  I started this, as I’ve indicated previously, as an experiment.  As such, I do things on this blog that I like.  That, to me, is the only convention any blogger should stick to:  write what you enjoy writing about.  Most of us do this for free, after all. 7. In retrospect, is it safe to say that the online blogging/reviewing world wasn’t quite ready for your blog/review column? Blogging/reviewing was dominated by powerhouses such as Wil Wheaton, Dave Itzkoff, and Harriet Klausner at the time. Looking back, was your blog/review column too avante-garde in style and tone? I don’t even know how to respond to this question.  If I say yes, it paints me as an arrogant jerk; if I say no, it implies that I’m a hack like Harriet Klausner (though not like Wil Wheaton, who I think has done a damned fine job of making something of himself based on his geek identity; he’s no

SF/F Commentary

Quick Announcement: Zoe Winters is Giving Away and Kindle

I just found out about this today, and unfortunately the contest ends tonight.  Zoe Winters is apparently giving away a Kindle 3 (3G).  It’s fairly easy to enter, and obviously she’s doing it to try to boost her sales for her new book, Blood Lust.  Hopefully she sees a spike. In any case, you should enter the contest!

SF/F Commentary

WISB-aversary: Four Years!

That’s right.  As of today, The World in the Satin Bag is four years old!  The date snuck up on me, so I don’t have anything planned.  However, I would like to point out some odd coincidences, which might hint to a conspiracy: 4 is also roughly the number of readers I have in hundreds via RSS. The number of posts I have published before this one is divisible by 4. 4 + half-of-4 equals the number for the day of my personal birthday, and when you add that number to 4, you end up with the number for the month. The 3rd is the day Britain and France declared war on Germany in 1939. Today is also the day in which a hurricane struck the Dominican Republic with 200 MPH winds, killing 8,000 (in 1930). It’s also the day that the Viking 2 landed on Mars. And lastly, this is also the day that Iran’s Parliament approved Marzieh Vahid Dastjerdi as the first female minister. What this means for all you conspiratorial types is that Britain, France, Mars, and Earth’s Climate have been secretly planning to invade the Dominican Republic with Iranian women on my birthday (Oct. 6th).  Obviously the plan has been in the works for over 70 years.  We should all be scared. Anywho.

SF/F Commentary

Haul of Books 2010: Stuff For Me v.20

The University of Florida bookstore had a clearance sale a few weeks ago.  I discovered it via my superpower, which is kind of a Sixth Sense meets Spiderman meets Wolverine’s nostrils.  The selection was somewhat limited–a lot of old textbooks and politics books–but there were a few books that were more to my liking.  All but one of the following books (Harmony is not one of them) is from that sale.  Hopefully they’ll be of interest to you all. So, here goes: Here are the descriptions, from left to right, top to bottom (from Amazon): 1. The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy: The Lion, the Witch, and the Worldview edited by Gregory Bassham and Jerry L. Walls The Chronicles of Narnia series has entertained millions of readers, both children and adults, since the appearance of the first book in 1950. Here, scholars turn the lens of philosophy on these timeless tales. Engagingly written for a lay audience, these essays consider a wealth of topics centered on the ethical, spiritual, mythic, and moral resonances in the adventures of Aslan, the Pevensie children, and the rest of the colorful cast. Do the spectacular events in Narnia give readers a simplistic view of human choice and decision making? Does Aslan offer a solution to the problem of evil? What does the character of Susan tell readers about Lewis’s view of gender? How does Lewis address the Nietzschean “master morality” embraced by most of the villains of the Chronicles? With these and a wide range of other questions, this provocative book takes a fresh view of the world of Narnia and expands readers’ experience of it. 2. Digital People: From Bionic Humans to Androids by Sidney Perkowitz Robots, androids, and bionic people pervade popular culture, from classics like Frankenstein and R.U.R. to modern tales such as The Six Million Dollar Man, The Terminator, and A.I. Our fascination is obvious and the technology is quickly moving from books and films to real life. In a lab at MIT, scientists and technicians have created an artificial being named COG. To watch COG interact with the environment to recognize that this machine has actual body language is to experience a hair-raising, gut-level reaction. Because just as we connect to artificial people in fiction, the merest hint of human-like action or appearance invariably engages us. Digital People examines the ways in which technology is inexorably driving us to a new and different level of humanity. As scientists draw on nanotechnology, molecular biology, artificial intelligence, and materials science, they are learning how to create beings that move, think, and look like people. Others are routinely using sophisticated surgical techniques to implant computer chips and drug-dispensing devices into our bodies, designing fully functional man-made body parts, and linking human brains with computers to make people healthier, smarter, and stronger. In short, we are going beyond what was once only science fiction to create bionic people with fully integrated artificial components and it will not be long before we reach the ultimate goal of constructing a completely synthetic human-like being. It seems quintessentially human to look beyond our natural limitations. Science has long been the lens through which we squint to discern our future. Although we are rightfully fearful about manipulating the boundaries between animate and inanimate, the benefits are too great to ignore. This thoughtful and provocative book shows us just where technology is taking us, in directions both wonderful and terrible, to ponder what it means to be human. 3. Harmony by Project Itoh In a perfect world, there is no escape In the future, Utopia has finally been achieved thanks to medical nanotechnology and a powerful ethic of social welfare and mutual consideration. This perfect world isn’t that perfect though, and three young girls stand up to totalitarian kindness and super-medicine by attempting suicide via starvation. It doesn’t work, but one of the girls–Tuan Kirie–grows up to be a member of the World Health Organization. As a crisis threatens the harmony of the new world, Tuan rediscovers another member of her suicide pact, and together they must help save the planet…from itself. 4. Conversations with Isaac Asimov edited by Carl Freedman Isaac Asimov (1920–1992), one of the most popular and influential American authors of the twentieth century, sparked the imagination of generations of writers. His “Foundation” trilogy paved the way for science fiction that was more speculative and philosophical than had been previously seen in the genre, and his book “I, Robot” and his story “The Bicentennial Man” have been made into popular movies. First published as a teenager in John W. Campbell’s groundbreaking science-fiction magazine “Astounding, Asimov published over two hundred books during his lifetime. While most prolific writers tend to concentrate almost exclusively on a single genre, Asimov was a polymath who wrote widely on a variety of subjects. He authored mysteries, autobiographies, histories, satires, companions to Shakespeare, children’s books on science, and collections of bawdy limericks. A lifelong atheist, he neverthe-less wrote more than a half dozen books on the Bible. Asimov’s varied interests establish him as a premier public intellectual, one who was frequently called upon to clarify debates in science, in history, and on the effects of technology on the modern age. “Conversations with Isaac Asimov” collects interviews with a man considered to be — along with Robert Heinlein, A. E. van Vogt, and Arthur C. Clarke — a founder of modern science fiction. Despite this, Asimov is perhaps best known for his many books of popular science writing. Carl Sagan once described Asimov as the greatest explainer of his age, and this talent made Asimov a natural for the interview form. His manner is always crisp and lucid, his tone always engaging, and his comments always enlightening. 5. Conversations with Carl Sagan edited by Tom Head Though a well-regarded physicist Carl Sagan (1934-1996) is best-known as a writer of popular nonfiction and science fiction and as the host of the PBS series Cosmos. Through his writings and spoken commentary, he worked to

SF/F Commentary

New Weird and Scifi Strange: Part Two — Invented Genres and Moments More

(See my previous post on New Weird here.) II.  Invented Genres and Moments More A lot has been discussed in the last year about the “Scifi Strange” subgenre.  One of the few people talking about it is its creator, Jason Sanford–contrary to what Adam Callaway says here, Sanford is, in fact, coining a subgenre, even if his intentions are not tied to the political reasonings tied into the business of genre-making.  Sanford has made his case quite clear:  he considers Scifi Strange to be an extension of traditional science (and science fiction) to its logical breaking point; stories of this genre seem to take a page from the theoretical and pseudo-philosophical fields of science (quantum mechanics, theoretical physics, and so forth) and imagine where science, in general, might go when directed under the same forward-thinking mentality.  Understandably, many of the stories Sanford considers to be emblematic of the Scifi Strange genre reflect this quality (more of his thoughts on the subgenre can be found in this interview).  I, however, have a few issues with the discussion, which I will try to elucidate here. A fundamental problem with “genres” seems, to me, to be that they are often poorly defined.  For overarching genres, this isn’t necessarily an issue, but for small subgenres it presents a serious problem.  Catch-all definitions seem to have more of a place for much larger forms (such as romance, speculative fiction, the novel, and so on), since they don’t require an excessive amount of exclusion to provide a reasonable category below which one can place related texts; subgenres, however, are meant to evoke one of two (or both) primary objects:  1) a period of writing (New Wave or Golden Age), or 2) a specific kind of writing, usually decided by a common theme or visual element, or the combination thereof (Cyberpunk or Space Western).  Scifi Strange, at least how it has been defined most recently by Jason Sanford and Adam Callaway, seems to lack, in part, both of these elements.  Specifically, I think a few quotes from Callaway deserve to be addressed directly, particularly since I am going suggest that Scifi Strange is not what people think it is in a future post–assuming, of course, that Scifi Strange actually exists. To start: SciFi Strange, on the other hand, attempts to evoke the sensawunda from the Golden Age, but combine it with the literary sensibilities of the New Wave, or, more accurately, writer’s who grew up reading the New Wave. The stories Sanford nominates as SF Strange do not sound like New Wave stories to me. They sound like stories written by people who read the Golden Age stuff young, and then the best of the New Wave during their formative teenage years. SF strange stories are like alchemical batteries combining elements that shouldn’t react with one another. If anything, the elements should repel each other. But give them the right catalyst (aka, the writer), and the elements respond in a barely controlled explosion. SF Strange stories are barely contained explosions. Callaway’s assertion, taken in part from Sanford’s various discussions of Scifi Strange, is less problematic than what he suggests moments before about New Weird, especially because he acknowledges, as do I, that the connection between Scifi Strange and New Wave is a thin one at best–although I say as much primarily because I think New Wave has become a catchall term in much the same way as other subgenres, rendering it somewhat useless to the discussion of science fiction “movements” and “classes,” since it should represent a specific group of texts, rather than a whole body of texts that simply do not fit together because they lack a connecting point.  For me, I look at New Wave and think of Samuel R. Delany and writers like him who were unafraid to use dense or experimental prose (by science fiction standards), to expand the horizons of science fiction’s discussion of gender, taboos, and so on, and who were also unafraid to shove aside linear narratives for something else altogether.  Maybe I’m wrong, but that is what the definition of New Wave evokes for me, and when I take that into account, I find the connection between Scifi Strange and New Wave almost non-existent.  Scifi Strange stories certainly experiment, but their experimentations, to me, seem to have less to do with the expansion of science fiction’s social horizons than they do with a general blurring of genre distinctions. However, while I agree with Callaway on the New Wave origins, I disagree with his argument that Scifi Strange stories are somehow a successful conversation of disparate elements.  Many SciFi Strange stories seem to blur the edges between fantasy and science fiction, albeit through the stretching of science to its mystical limits.  While these two genres imply an opposition, they have historically been quite the opposite.  One need look no further than the science fiction and fantasy bookshelf and early science fiction, in which the two genres blended almost effortlessly in the form of SF icons like Buck Rodgers, Flash Gordon, Andre Norton, and so on.  Blending genre elements is a common occurrence in SF precisely because SF and F are not disparate genres.  Both SF and F draw from a similar source, and while they do attempt to go in different directions with the elements they draw from that originary scourse, it is not unexpected that the two would occasionally overlap without creating issues with narrative cohesion and setting.  There is no repellent nature to be exposed here, because SF/F are simply branches from the same tree and inherently complementary in their apparent differentiation.  As Clarke said, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Scifi Strange embodies this very idea: that truly distant futures might not resemble a world we know and might instead look to us to be composed of elements that defy our understanding of the present–i.e. a limited, sometimes only near-future-oriented understanding. But Callaway has a little more to say about Scifi Strange: SF Strange

Scroll to Top