Short Stories (another babble about this)
Anyone reading about science fiction right now will undoubtedly have heard about the demise of the short story market. I think of all the forms that science fiction (and fantasy) comes in, the short form is the one that is most likely to die as a viable market. Anthologies and collections will still be around, but the magazine market, I think, is in serious danger of going away. The sad part of this is that the science fiction short has such an amazing history. Some of the first stories in science fiction were short stories! Go back to the days of Astounding, IF, Galaxy, Imaginative Tales, etc. I certainly wasn’t alive when those magazines were initially running, but I am such a sucker for what I would call ‘historical science fiction’, meaning SF that is of historical import to the genre. I even have some twenty years worth of back issues from the early days of Analog to today. I certainly have not read all of them, but I have read a good portion and I love them to death.So, why are subscriptions and sales dropping? Why are the big three dying (Analog, Asimov, and F&SF)?Perhaps some reasons for the demise is that SF & F magazines have problems acquiring works from authors who are big names in the genre, or at least have problems getting truly awe-inspiring work. This is just a judgment based on what I think might be a possible reason, but as I just subscribed to Analog for the second time today I obviously am not 100% clear on how true this is. But I will argue a point about this. These magazines don’t typically pay a lot of money for short stories. Scifiction paid something close to fifty cents (USD) a word when it was in existence, and it was one of the highest paying markets. But Analog and the other three don’t pay nearly that much–though certainly the big three have a lot of prestige attached to them for good reason. Writers who want to pursue writing as a career are less likely to work with short stories simply because it isn’t a market that they can rely on for income. At best, short form markets can supplement income, but not replace it. There are probably a few authors who do survive on shorts (such as Alastair Reynolds who sells books of connected shorts), but most of us aren’t those lucky few. But magazines are like book companies: they rely on sales. When circulation goes down, so too does the money they are pulling in as profit, and as such there is no chance that these magazines would increase how much they pay. It’s a sad paradox really, although I really doubt that the magazines intend to increase payment anyway.Perhaps that reason is only a minor reason. Certainly a lot of the bigger authors who publish books have little interest in short form because they simply do not have the time to ‘waste’. I put emphasis on ‘waste’ because I don’t find writing shorts to be a waste of time. I actually enjoy writing shorts, even if I may not be very good at them. But I’m also not writing several novels a year, so I can fully understand why established authors might not want to spend time on short stories.I think the most pressing matter in the demise of the short story market, however, is that people simply do not know where to find them. The big three are generally easy enough to find if you live in a large city. However, I’ve been to several Borders stores that didn’t have Asimov’s or Analog’s, or even F&SF. In fact, I’ve been to several Borders that had no speculative fiction magazines at all. I don’t know if this is Borders’ issue, or if it is the management of those stores, but it seems to me that if you want sales of the big three, and even some of the smaller magazines that are actually quite good I hear, then you should be making it your mission to make sure they are easy to find. Not everyone who would enjoy reading SF or F shorts knows to go online and go straight to Asimov’s website or to Analog’s. In fact, aside from the big three, it’s really not that simple to find the quality speculative fiction magazines if you don’t know where to look.The fact that even the big three are hard to find is an indicator of what the short story market needs to do: advertise and establish a marketplace presence. How are people supposed to find out about these magazines, give them a look, read them, etc. if they can’t even find them in their favorite newsstand or book store? That’s the problem, they can’t. There are dozens of quality magazines that print quality material, but almost none of them are available to the general public in traditional venues (yes, I know they are on the net, but that’s not a ‘traditional venue’). Most people are not entirely interested in going online to find magazines to subscribe to. So something that magazines need to do is get themselves out there.And what if the big three are not suitable to your tastes? While the big three are certainly in a lot of stores and therefore have more exposure than the other magazines, they also publish a certain type of speculative fiction. As such, they go into the store and don’t see anything to their liking and never buy the magazines that they would be interested in, which unfortunately are not in a lot of stores and very well should be. In short (ha, get the pun?), the magazine market needs to make itself better known.Another thing that might make people more inclined to subscribe is to offer ‘example issues’ online. They could be a few notable stories from last year that, most likely, are not going to be read by people in the
World Fantasy Award Winners!
Well, everyone else is talking about it, so I might as well tell all my readers who the winners were at the World Fantasy Awards this year. Lifetime AchievementDiane Wynne Jones and Betty BallantineNovelSoldier of Sidon, Gene Wolfe (Tor)Novella“Botch Town”, Jeffrey Ford (The Empire of Ice Cream, Golden Gryphon)Short Fiction“Journey Into the Kingdom”, M. Rickert (F&SF 5/06)AnthologySalon Fantastique, Ellen Datlow & Terri Windling, eds. (Thunder’s Mouth)CollectionMap of Dreams, M. Rickert (Golden Gryphon)ArtistShaun TanSpecial Award: ProfessionalEllen Asher (For work at SFBC)Special Award: Non-professionalGary K. Wolfe (for reviews and criticism in Locus and elsewhere) So there you have it! Congrats to all the winners. Looks like I’m missing out on a lot of great literature here. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this)
A Solid Farewell To An Icon
It’s really irrelevant if you liked Robert Jordan’s work or not. You can’t deny his impact on fantasy literature, one that while not as powerful as Tolkien’s, is certainly recognizable. Jordan pioneered the massive fantasy epic series. There is no doubt that his writing (including not only the Wheel of Time, but various other work too) has brought rise to countless long-winded fantasy series. And like all literature, it’s hit or miss. The impact is undeniable, whether or not you see it as positive or negative (though you have to admit that his impact is a little of both).With his passing he has left behind quite a legacy, including an unfortunately unfinished fantasy series that we all of have heard of–The Wheel of Time. Like Zelazny’s Chronicles of Amber…I have never read any of his works, but I recognize his importance to the fantasy genre, much like I recognize Tolkien even though I was not a fan of his writing (the story was excellent, but it wasn’t written very well in my opinion).So with that, here is a wonderful adieu to an icon that seems to have left his mark.