May 2011

SF/F Commentary

Top 7 Repeated Science Fiction Phrases or Words That Have Become Annoying

Remember when it used to be relevant to say “repeated like a broken record” or something like that?  Yeah, neither do I.  But people sure sound like one these days, what with Twitter making it easier and easier to repost every “nifty” thing you’ve ever seen alongside blogs and picture sites used for the same purpose.  Some of those “nifty” things have become plain annoying, shoved into the rest of us like smelly hand-me-down socks made by a dead aunt or Santa. Maybe I’m being a little harsh, but I’ve seen the following seven phrases/words peddled around more times than I care to count, and I’m just about sick of them: 7.  “May the fourth be with you.” It’s only funny if a child says it.  But children aren’t the ones saying it on Twitter.  And it’s not cute.  It’s not even clever.  It’s the kind of thing you laugh at when your kid says it, just like the time they told you that silly knock-knock joke about oranges and apples that you’ve heard a thousand times before. I get it, though.  The fourth of May is Star Wars Day, but let’s at least pretend that real clever people run the SF/F world.  Hell, you could even say your child said it so you can get away with posting it twelve times on your Twitter account… 6.  “All this has happened before. All this will happen again.” It’s an old saying picked up by Ron Moore for his re-imagining of Battlestar Galactica.  And for a while, it was a creepy way of saying fate was about to screw everyone over in the show.  But then people started using it to refer to their day-to-day lives, and mundane things like getting cheap American coffee from a parasitic coffee company…until, finally, people just started saying it for no reason at all, sucking all the life out of a phrase and killing its immense mythology.  Good job, newbs. 5.  “Reality is for those who can’t handle Science-Fiction.” No, it’s not.  Reality is for people who write or read science fiction, because without a sense of reality or an understanding of how the now functions, one can’t actually write science fiction.  Sure, you can come up with some kind of bastardized SF/F hybrid, but you’ll never approach the greatness of true geniuses in the field (if we’re going with the pretentious version of things).  Still, it’s a nice try at saying something approaching smart. 4.  “Politicians should read science fiction, not westerns and detective stories.” You know what politicians should read?  The frakking U.S. Constitution (or other relevant document if they’re not American politicians).  You know what else they should read?  Facts.  I don’t think science fiction is high on the list of things politicians should be familiar with.  Don’t get me wrong; I love SF and think everyone should read it, but our politicians don’t suck because they don’t read my favorite genre.  They suck because they’re idiots. 3.  “When I die, I’m leaving my body to science fiction.” I thought this was a cute phrase for the first few days.  But then everyone and their ancient relatives (the crusty ones with bad manners) started posting it on their Twitter accounts, usually with an exclamation point to drive home their pathetic attempt at a geeky badge of honor.  Listen up, folks.  You don’t get your geek badge by being annoying.  That’s not how it works.  First, you have to sell your soul to a Batherian bloodmonk.  Second, you have to kill your first dragon while in a spaceship made of solid diamonds.  And third, you have to name the primary cast members of at least three different SF/F movie or TV properties.  I don’t make the rules.  That’s just the way it is… 2.  “Science fiction is dead/dying.” You know why science fiction is “dying?”  Because every other week some asshole says it’s dying and people start to think it is.  It’s called propaganda, and if I didn’t know better, I’d think people who say SF is dying are part of a group of literary elites trying to kill SF from the inside.  I wouldn’t put it past them.  They’re a vicious bunch… 1.  Anything with “punk” attached to it. The “punk” in Cyberpunk used to mean something.  It really did.  Now people shove it onto every term they want in order to sound hip.  The problem?  You end up pissing on all those who legitimately engaged with the “punk” dynamic.  I don’t care much for pissing on literary geniuses like William Gibson or Bruce Sterling or Jeff Noon or Richard Calder, or even folks who pioneered the Steampunk genre way back before it was Steampunk.  But the whole “punk” thing has gotten out of hand.  How about we attach “ism” to subgenres instead?  Steamism, Dieselism, Undergarmentism… See?  That sounds better… That’s my list.  What annoying science fiction phrases or words have annoyed you recently or in the past?

SF/F Commentary

The Children of Tomorrow and What They Will See (or, Obama-mania’s Future)

One of my friends on Facebook recently posted this on his profile: the internet scares me. it makes me think people really would vote for trump. it makes me think people really believe obama is part of a conspiracy hatched decades ago to put a racist homosexual kenyan marxist-anarchist-fascist (say what?) in the white house. i’m losing faith in people with each new facebook group dedicated to shit like this. I’m not going to give out his name in case he doesn’t want it to be any more public than his FB account.  I initially wanted to respond straight to his post, but then decided I should say the following here (after the fold): Imagine what the world looked like to African Americans pre-1865 or the years surrounding and leading up to the Civil Rights Movement in the south. Maybe it’s because we’re older and more aware of what’s going on around us, but the country is losing its damn mind again, for the second time in the last decade-ish. We went batshit on Muslims and look-alikes, and now we’re seriously entertaining buried racist ideology simply because Obama is one of those brown people, and just can’t possibly be one of us. But that’s not enough. The same people have to other him even more by making him the brown person who is also a socialist commie fascist pigdog, because once we accept that as the truth, we can do anything to him and feel no remorse. The Joker Socialist — a double othering… This is the same rhetorical practice used to justify the Holocaust or the Gulags or slavery or the countless other racist and ideological evils that have been thrust upon humanity like a stain. It’s the same practice used to make it acceptable to murder homosexuals by dragging them by a rope behind a moving car or raping them with broom handles.  It’s the same practice which everyday makes people afraid or irreparably damages families all over the country. Because we have a rabid fear of terrorism… And in 20 or 30 years, or maybe 60, or 100, our children will look back, if indeed our children still exist, and they’ll wonder what was wrong with us. What unspeakable mental illness had befallen us as we continued to perpetrate great evil against humanity, against people who aren’t actually different, but are made different by arbitrary social “rules.” And if we’re still around, or more enlightened people are there to say something to those curious children, they might say we were infected with a festering hatred so buried into our blood that we couldn’t contain it…couldn’t hold back the tide of thousands of years of human bloodlust and fear, and in that brief little span of history we were weak, pathetic, and undeserving of the mountains luxuries and freedoms thrown at us like cheap magic tricks in a casino hotel.  We were undeserving of the men and women who die on the battlefield at the behest of their country and honor. Because clearly they’ve done so much harm to humanity… Some of us will have to look into our children’s eyes and see that overwhelming childish confusion, much as many children today look at us when they ask us questions about slavery or, sometimes, even racism and sexism (though not so much the last of those great evils, because we still live in a world entwined in the old ideals of male superiority). Personally, I dread that day.  I wish I lived in a country where the future of my children would not be so fraught by what will undoubtedly appear to them as utter stupidity.  But that’s not the future my children or your children will have.  Maybe one day we’ll get it right, and the evils of everyday life will be relatively minor, dealt with on a case by case basis.  The history of humanity, however, says otherwise, but I am always hopeful for a better tomorrow…

SF/F Commentary

Graphic Novel Review: Maoh (Juvenile Remix) by Kotaro Isaka and Megumi Osuga

(This will be the last of my manga reviews for a while.  I’ve got a lot of fiction titles set to be reviewed, including an Aston West short story collection, Harbor by Lindqvist, Serial Killers Inc by Andy Remic, A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin, and a whole bunch of other stuff sitting on my Nook or my book-infested floor.  Now to the review…) Maoh is another series I discovered with my Utopian Studies glasses on, something which I am quite pleased about.  Of the three manga titles I picked up at MegaCon (Utopia’s Avenger and Library Wars are the others), Maoh is the most complex and interesting, delving deep into the dark recesses of citizen-based justice, bullying, and self-identity, all within the first volume. Maoh takes place in Nekota, a city that is rapidly modernizing, taking with it the world its residents have come to love.  Gangs roam the streets, crime is on the rise, and greedy businessmen are trying to take everything they can while the city falls apart around them.  But a vigilante group — known as Grasshopper and led by the charming and beautiful Inukai — has risen up to restore “peace” and “prosperity” while opposing the New World’s “progress.”  Caught in the middle is Ando, a high schooler who has done everything he can to conform and hide his real self.  But Ando’s discovery of the dark side of Grasshopper — deadly beatings and psychotic murder attempts — forces him to change, to think about who he is and who he wants to be in a city creeping closer to the edge of sanity… If one were to focus on the strongest aspect of Osuga’s adaptation of Isaka’s story, it would have to be characterization.  Ando is both a sympathetic character and an intriguing one.  Seeing the changing city of Nekota through his eyes provides a unique, almost anti-heroic perspective through which the major developments of the book can be consumed (M.A.O.H., as it turns out, stands for “minor acts of heroism”).  It is through that perspective that one begins to understand the intricacies of what is going on and its implications.  As Inukai gains more power, Ando grows more weary and concerned, both about his wellbeing and the wellbeing of the city and its citizens, both of which force him to reevaluate his world view and his rules for engagement (i.e. rules that he has written to keep his “weirdness” away from prying eyes). The development of Ando’s character, as such, presents itself in a kind of complex of character interactions.  Instead of reducing Maoh to a simple-minded and overly direct narrative of self-discovery (such as one which hinges on increasing a character’s power), Osuga has created a narrative which plays out through numerous subplots.  Ando’s interactions with a fellow classmate (who has become a member of Grasshopper and begun beating or attempting to kill off the bullies in their school), for example, direct him to consider how he has contributed to the conditions of a hierarchical class system in their high school and the morality of vigilante justice.  Both weigh heavily on his conscience, but the storyline isn’t resolved in the first volume precisely because this is tied into the larger narrative of Inukai’s rise to power, which Ando knows is based on a morally ambiguous set of violent actions. A similar activity is present in Ando’s attempts to understand his relatively low-key magic.  While Ando does have the ability to make others say what he is thinking, it is not a skill he is particular good at (having just discovered it), nor a skill which he is inclined to let others know about.  His ability, then, plays an active role in his development as a character, forcing him to reshape his perspective on his life and consider the ramifications of his attempts to build an unexceptional persona for himself, in much the same way as his murderous classmate has raised similar questions.  His use of his ability also escalates as he becomes more confident, acting as a kind of barometer. Ando’s magic and interactions with classmates are only two of the many ways Osuga sets up a multi-volume journey through a dislocated youth’s self-discovery.  These narrative strands present themselves in Ando’s relationship with his brother, his interactions with seemingly random characters in the city (who might make appearances later), and even in his disconnected interactions with Inukai (whom he never meets, but sees in action on a number of occasions, good and bad).  I think it is fair to remark that Inukai’s increased authority in the story is a little rushed, but pacing in manga is sometimes faster than in other forms of literature, in part because manga is often serialized by chapter.  Regardless, the treatment of Ando’s character makes for a story that is gripping and challenging. The only serious flaw in Maoh, however, is in its out-of-place family-based humor.  In any other narrative, I might have found the silliness of Ando’s brother and his brother’s girlfriend amusing; many jokes are had at their expense (the brother because he can’t cook and is somewhat lazy, and the girlfriend because she is portrayed as exceptionally dimwitted).  But the serious tone of Maoh means that such moments are always sucking something away from a tension that needs to be there for the darker aspects of the narrative to hit their stride.  I hope that future volumes either pull back on this kind of humor or find more appropriate ways to insert humor into the story.  There is always room for humor in a serious tale, but it always comes down to timing.  Here, I think the silliness of the humor detracts from an intense narrative, though only slightly, since such moments were few and far between. Despite the above flaw, I think the first volume is a fantastic read.  Fans of Anthony Burgess might find Osuga’s story intriguing, while manga readers may be drawn to the subtlety of the narrative.  If you’re not a manga fan,

SF/F Commentary

How Important is Science Fact in Science Fiction?

I’ve heard the question a few times before, but I can’t remember if I’ve ever addressed it from my personal perspective (as a writer and as a reader).  Science fiction, for me, has always been as much about its science as it is about its fiction, but always within a certain futurological perspective — that is that I see science fiction as being about extrapolative and progressive science (cyberpunk, space opera, hard SF, etc.), rather than about extrapolative and alt-historical science (alternate history, steampunk, etc.).  But one thing that I’ve never held firm to is the idea that the science must be factual in order for something to be considered science fiction. For me, the science in science fiction only needs to feel plausible.  When I read science fiction, I’m not looking for stories that are actually accurate based on real scientific knowledge (of the now or the then).  I need to believe the world being relayed to me is real, even if the technology within it is far beyond anything we have today or even impossible based on what little science knowledge I have.  Even bad science can be written in a way that sounds good, which I think is more important to science fiction as a social genre than limiting oneself to scientific rigor.  SF certainly is about science, but only insofar as it is about how science changes us.  For this reason, I think much of the science in SF can be metaphorical rather than strictly factual. Writing plausible science, however, is never an easy task.  More often than not, I think it can be done by being consistent without excessive info-dumping.  The longer an author spends talking about how something works, the more likely it is for me to start seeing the holes.  That’s not to say that info-dumping isn’t good to a certain extent.  In fact, I’d argue that treating the technology too lightly can reveal different kinds of holes (ones tied to the worldbuilding rather than to the logic).  For most writers, I think the balance is easy to manage.  I’ve only read a few books in which the holes in the world’s logic were so obvious that I had to stop reading, and most of them were not published by major publishers of SF (or even reputable small presses). But perhaps my lax standards in regards to science have something to do with the fact that I’m an English major and not a scientist (though I’m no illiterate when it comes to science).  I suspect that many scientists are frequently annoyed by what “passes” for science fiction these days.  They see the holes all the time, right down to the core. How about you, though?  How important to you is science fact to science fiction?

SF/F Commentary

Addendum: A Game of Thrones and Wikipedia Wars

You all might recall that I responded to the New York Times review of A Game of Thrones by Ginia Bellafante about two weeks ago.  At the bottom of that post, I had a screencap of her Wikipedia page, which had, at the time, been edited in response to her review.  For fun, I decided to compile all the most amusing sentences and changes since the 15th of April. As of April 15, 2011 (22:08 PM)(it was promptly removed): Often shows a skewed and limited perception of women. As of April 15, 2011 (22:24 PM)(also promptly removed): And loves bashing the fantasy genre and has a skewed outlook on life. As of April 15, 2011 (22:40 PM)(again, removed — let’s just assume everything is eventually removed at this point): She is a bad critic. As of April 16, 2011 (7:11 AM): Ginia Bellafante (born March 31, 1965) is an ill-informed and bizarrely sexist American writer and critic, for the New York Times,[1] New York Observer,[2] and Time (magazine). As of April 16, 2011 (21:27 PM): Ginia Bellafante (born March 31, 1965) is an American writer and critic, for the New York Times, also weirdly anti-feminist[1] New York Observer,[2] and Time (magazine). As of April 17, 2011 (5:33 AM): She is also weirdly anti-feminist and believes that the interests of women can be put into boxes. As of April 17, 2011 (16:03 PM): Her 2011 review of the Game of Thrones TV series was widely criticized as sexist for suggesting that only sexual content might motivate women to watch a complex fantasy story. As of April 18, 2011 (20:03 PM): Bellafante’s writing has been criticized for its superficial treatment of gender issues: Salon.com critiqued a 1998 Time cover story on feminism by Bellafante as “poorly thought-out”, and her 2011 New York Times review of the TV series Game of Thrones was widely criticized as sexist for suggesting that only sexual content might motivate women to watch a complex fantasy story. As of April 18, 2011 (20:12 PM): Bellafante’s writing has been criticized for its superficial treatment of gender issues: Bellafante’s 1998 Time cover story “Is Feminism Dead?” was critiqued by Erica Jong[4] and described by Salon.com as “poorly thought-out”, and Bellafante’s 2011 New York Times review of the TV series Game of Thrones was widely criticized as sexist for suggesting that only sexual content might motivate women to watch a complex fantasy story. As of April 25, 2011 (7:29 AM): Her writing has been criticized for its superficial treatment of gender issues: Her 1998 Time cover story “Is Feminism Dead?” was critiqued by Erica Jong[4] and described by Salon.com as “poorly thought-out”, and her 2011 New York Times review of the TV series Game of Thrones was widely criticized as sexist for suggesting that only sexual content might motivate women to watch a complex fantasy story. And there you go.  Interesting how these things develop, no?

SF/F Commentary

The Skiffy and Fanty Show #3.5 is live! (The Hugos, Complaints, and GRRM)

Adam Callaway returns to replace Jen for this thrilling episode about the recent Hugo Award nominees and George R. R. Martin.  I say thrilling because Adam and I may be a little jaded about the Hugos this year (well, it’s every year for Adam).  If you’d like to hear our thoughts, you can stream or download the episode. As always, we appreciate any opinions you might have, either about the show as a whole or the episode in question.  You can leave comments on the website, on our Twitter, or even via email at skiffyandfanty[at]gmail[dot]com.

Scroll to Top