November 2011

SF/F Commentary

Movie (Mini) Review: Chocolate (Thai Martial Arts Flick of Awesome)

(I originally posted this mini-rant on Google+, but figured those of you who don’t bother with all that social networking B.S. would also be interested.) I just finished watching a martial arts movie called Chocolate.  The movie itself is pretty awesome:  it’s about girl whose autism allows her to learn fighting styles at a young age; her mother and father were part of a gang/Yakuza dispute in Thailand, which led to her father’s exile (before she was born).  And when her mother contracts cancer and can’t afford the medicines, Zen (the girl) and her “cousin” Moom set out to try to collect on debts once owed to Zin (the mother).  But things go terribly wrong, as you can imagine.  Point is:  touching little story with a whole bunch of amazing fight scenes a la Ong Bak (only, you know, with a seemingly pre-teen girl beating the crap out of fully grown men). But that’s not the amazing part.  The really amazing part is when you get to the end and they start showing you the results of some of the fights.  This stuff wouldn’t be allowed in the U.S., I imagine.  All the actors do their own stunts, and they get stabbed, break ribs, get smacked in the face, fall badly, and so on and so forth.  It adds a whole new dimension to the experience, because you start to realize that a lot of the things you see on the screen, while scripted, really do lead to the people getting effed up.  And that’s, well, kinda awesome. In any case, if you haven’t seen Chocolate and you’re looking for a little magical realism in your martial arts obsession, this is one to check out. (Psst.  It’s on Netflix stream!) (I should note that I’m well aware that injuries occur in martial arts films quite regularly — and probably with some regularity in other kinds of stunt-heavy films.  We just don’t get an opportunity to see the carnage to the extent that you see in Chocolate.  Everyone gets messed up in this film at some point or another — even the main actress.)

SF/F Commentary

SandF #6.1 (An Interview w/ Michaele Jordan) is Live!

Another episode is coming your way from The Skiffy and Fanty Show.  This week, Jen and I interview author Michaele Jordan (Mirror Maze).  Topics include:  Victorian pulp fiction, Victorian morality, names, mysticism, and a lot of other cool stuff you all need to listen to. If you want to get the episode, you can do so here (or on that iTunes thing).

SF/F Commentary

English: The Non-essential Fun Degree?

The basis for this post comes from a troll who left a frothy list of accusations and assumptions about what I know, and, most importantly, what I do.  As trolls are wont to do, much of what was said can be waved off as pish posh and poppycock, but it’s the attack on the English degree that, I think, stems from a much larger misunderstanding of the field.  I’d like to address those misunderstandings here. What We (Don’t) Do There are a lot of myths about English majors, some of them perpetuated by films and others by people who really don’t know anything about the state of the field today.  But it would be more efficient to deal with what English majors do rather than refuting the long list of things that they don’t. English is an interdisciplinary field.  That means that rather than only studying literature and literary criticism, English majors also study sociology, history, science, economics, anthropology, archaeology, philosophy, and dozens of other fields — depending, of course, on individual study interests.  My research, for example, requires me to be familiar with at least half of the disciplines already lists, as studying empire demands knowledge from a variety of directions.  While it is true that English majors are not trained in most of these fields (in the proper sense of the term “trained”), they are also not lazy wanderers.  They take interdisciplinarity seriously because they understand the value of research in other disciplines.  And those disciplines bleed into one another — research from one field becomes important to another, and vice versa. In fact, much of what English majors are concerned with are the ways language has been used in the past, how it is used now, and how it will be used in the future.  Recall that language has and will continue to be used for everything from propaganda to public outreach to exploration of the self.  There are infinite numbers of uses for the written word, and studying such uses (what it means, what it does, how it influences the formation of nations or groups or our conception of self, etc.) is the domain of English majors.  And those things are important, not least of all because understanding where we come from and how we go to where we are today will help us, as a species or culture or nation, to figure out where we are going (or how we can get somewhere else). Likewise, English majors are concerned with processes of thinking.  At the same time that we teach “stuffy literature classes,” we are also attempting to foster independent thought through an almost scientific process. Learning literature is not about figuring out what hidden meanings Shakespeare put into his work, but about making hypotheses, finding evidence, and using that evidence to support an argument — rinse and repeat.  And because the field is interdisciplinary, that often means examining literature in a wide range of social, political, or philosophical contexts. Not So Non-Essential As I’ve argued before (on Google+ somewhere), English is not a non-essential degree program.  In fact, without English majors, civilization cannot function.*  English majors teach the language to children or people in businesses in other countries.  They teach adults who went to underfunded schools and were left behind, or adults who made poor choices and want to get back on their feet.  They teach people to write, to read, to comprehend, and to argue. English majors are journalists — who bring the world to our doorstep — and authors — who teach us something about ourselves.  They are technical writers, social workers, lawyers or legal assistants, copywriters, editors, grant writers, PR specialists, administrative assistants, etc.**  They work for the various departments of the government, non-profits, schools, and businesses in a variety of fields for which their degrees qualified them. Basically, English majors are essential to the fabric of the nation, much like many other majors.  Because English degrees generally require immersion in a variety of disciplines, those who acquire those degrees are not only uniquely trained for non-academic jobs, but are also uniquely trained to teach the next generation of thinkers to think from a variety of avenues.  It’s not all about stuffy, ancient literature in these parts. What Others Think (Updated Periodically) Kea Worthen English majors are important because it teaches a type of observation and thinking skill set that many other disciplines don’t allow. I mean, we call ourselves English majors, but we really should be in the school of Interdisciplinary Studies. I have never met an English major that just studies English. We look at sociology, culture, gender, history, religion, etc…And we think about things in terms of what happened in the past, what happens in the present, and what will happen in the future. That is, I think, the main problem with society. Too many people have tunnel vision. And that tunnel vision limits so many possibilities. English majors are trained to look at those other possibilities–even if those possibilities makes us uncomfortable sometimes. But it is about self-improvement. And having a thought process that is not prearranged by an ideological apparatus. Sure, we suffer under our own ideologies, but at least we are cognizant of it. I think that is why the English major is so important. Because we learn to observe and think about what we are observing. That is, to me, an important thing. Paul Genesse English majors are some of my best friends. A number of them are also excellent teachers. Getting an English degree is not the best move if you want to assure yourself a high-paying job, but most English majors are very resourceful people. Jennifer Bagley Kea stole my answer! So I will just concur with her. English majors are not only interdisciplinary, but they are valuable in nearly every career field – communications, politics, law, business, even science related careers who need a bit of a hand in terms of creative thinking and expressing ideas. There’s a reason that most technical

SF/F Commentary

Gentle Reminder: Jesse Jackson Isn’t Running For President

Amusing as it may be to play the “the liberal media is going after Herman Cain” card when it comes to the allegations recently made against Jesse Jackson, it is also prudent to remember one incredibly important fact:  Jesse Jackson isn’t running for President.  Let’s also be honest about something else:  if he were running for President, you better believe that liberals and conservatives alike would, in their own way, go after him for his numerous failings as a “moral person.”  Jackson is not unfamiliar to the controversy bucket, as his 1984 comments about Jews (shortly after losing the Presidential ticket) and his numerous infidelities make clear.  And I think his history makes him unlikely as a legitimate Democratic candidate for the Presidency in the future. Of course, The Huffington Post did report on the incident.  But I suppose we can just pretend they aren’t part of the “liberal media” or the “media” in general.  Ever so insignificant that Huffington Post… In any case, the predominately right-leaning base will take this oversight as an indictment of the evil liberal media and its evil ways of leaving out the truth.  This great conspiracy theory falls apart when you actually look at who comprises the liberal media:  corporate-owned, largely conservative agencies who are no more liberals than their right-leaning counterparts.  While such agencies may espouse liberal values, they do so only by paying lip-service to them, for the moment any challenge comes to the conservative elite, those very agencies flip over like dogs begging to be scratched and pounce on their liberal audience.  We know this because various “liberal” papers supported the Bush post-9/11 narrative in order to justify gross human rights violations — they did so by changing the language they used to describe “torture.”  We know this because the way the Occupy Everywhere protesters have been presented by almost all of the major news outlets has been less favorable than similar coverage by media sources from elsewhere, often at the expense of the messages actually being presented by OWS and her allies.  This is because OE represents a threat to the establishment, who owns most of the so called “liberal media” and is quite apt at putting pressure where it needs to be in order to keep the narrative peddled by the media as divisive, entertaining, and supportive of the status quo as possible. And that’s really where all this rests:  talking about who is a liberal and who is a conservative and who has the right narrative, blah blah blah, is all a giant game of ideology that serves no other purpose than to keep people nipping at one another’s throats.  The truth of matter is that very little “truth” gets through corporate media.  If you want to see what’s going on in the world, you have to go to independent media sources, or the rare corporate media source that doesn’t have its hands caught in the cookie jar (I would look at The Guardian as one such source). But to return to the original point:  why is Herman Cain getting the shaft and Jesse Jackson a pass? Herman Cain is running for President.  I can’t say whether Cain is innocent of the charges, but it goes without saying that a Presidential hopeful should be subject to public scrutiny.  This includes Obama, who I will undoubtedly criticize throughout the next year in my evil liberal circles.  But since Jesse Jackson is not running for President, and remains little more than an activist whose core values are really hard to disagree with (justice for people of color, etc.), I really don’t see the point in putting Cain and Jackson on the same public pedestal. Cain has a tendency to shove his foot in his mouth whenever he talks, which makes challenging him on allegations of sexual harassment all the more important.  Any candidate who cannot keep his narrative straight deserves the kind of scrutiny Cain is getting.  Did Cain know about the settlement or not?  Should abortion be illegal or a choice?  Whose fault is it for the high unemployment rate — those without jobs or the system?  I could go on, but I think the point is made.  I have the same misgivings about Romney and Perry, whose rambling and flip-flopping make it rather difficult to determine where they actually stand.  And I have the same misgivings about Obama, who I think betrayed his progressive base by cowering before the opposition. Jackson isn’t really getting a pass.  Plenty of news sources are covering the incident.  But the truth is that very few people actually care.  That’s not because Jackson is unimportant in a general sense.  It’s that he’s unimportant when compared to the vast array of problems and events happening all around us.  Are we really concerned with whether Jackson fondled someone’s testicles or whether Presidential hopeful Cain sexually harassed a woman, or whether the economy will bounce back or Obama’s Jobs Bill will get passed (and if it will be good for us), or whether Occupy Wall Street will effect any changes (or if it is really bad for the country), or whether the Arab Spring will produce good results in the Middle East, or whether we’ll withdraw troops from Iraq or Afghanistan, and so on and so forth. If you honestly think Jackson’s discrimination against a gay man is more important than those other questions, then your priorities are out of sync.  And that’s okay, so long as you admit that you are governed by your biases and not by a need to see the big questions asked and addressed on the national stage.  It’s not like talking about the case publicly is going to change whether Jackson gets charged with sexual harassment or not. For now, let’s be honest.  Jackson doesn’t matter.  He’s not going to make the election for Obama.  He’s not going to make the election for Cain.  He’s not going to damage the Democrats anymore than their failure to act.  In the long run, we’ll

Scroll to Top