World in the Satin Bag

SF/F Links: The Giveaway Batch

Because there are a lot of book giveaways going on during the month of May, I thought I would have a post dedicated specifically to them. Here goes: J. Kaye’s Book Blog has a copy of Starfinder by John Marco up for grabs. Presenting Lenore has a prize pack of fantasy novels from Penguin to give away. She also has a prize pack of realistic fiction there too, which might be worth checking out. Wendy’s Minding Spot is giving away a copy of Worst Nightmares by Shane Briant. Happy Are We is tossing up some Michael Scott books (The Alchemyst and The Magician), as well as a mug! Sounds good to me! Reading, Writing, and Ranting is letting you choose between winning The Host by Stephanie Meyer or Dead and Gone by Charlaine Harris. Fantasy Dreamer has Blue Diablo by Ann Aguirre up for grabs. Win a copy of Dead and Gone: Charlaine Harris plus a signed copy of The Sweet Scent of Blood: Spellcrackers.com, Book 1, here at Suzanne McLeod’s blog to celebrate Dead and Gone being No. 1 on the New York Times list and Suzanne’s book 2’s upcoming release on 16th July 2009. And that’s it for now! Thanks for reading!

World in the Satin Bag

7 Reason Why I Won’t Follow You on Twitter

Twitter is a great tool when used properly. One of the biggest problems with Twitter is that everyone and their mother is trying to use it, and unfortunately I’m not going to follow everyone and their mother. Here are the seven reasons why I won’t follow you on Twitter: You post nothing but links. I’m not interested in your dozens of links about a topic I’m already not interested in. Twitter isn’t a link mill. Do something else. You use Twitter only to promote yourself and refuse to be a part of the community. I don’t follow people I know I’m not going to be able to chat with. I want conversations, sharing, and cooperation, not a one-sided borefest. There are exceptions, of course, for publishers. You type in textspeak or are otherwise incapable of using even basic English spelling, punctuation, and grammar. I know you only get 140 characters, but if I need a chatspeak dictionary to decipher what you’re writing, then you’re a waste of my time. You follow ten times more people than follow you. Unless I already know you, I’m likely not going to follow you if it’s clear to me that you’re on Twitter to spam. You try to force me to buy your product. Chances are, I don’t want it, even if it is something up my alley. Tell me about it, and then shut up. You’re just another of those self-proclaimed SEO masters or whatever other nonsense Web 2.0 titles are out there. Honestly, I don’t really care. I’m not on Twitter to find out how to make my blog the next Boing Boing or whatever. That, and, there are about ten trillion of you people out there, and none of you offer anything new. I can Google most everything you say. You’re interested in subjects that I’m not interested in or you don’t have a bio. With rare exception, I am not going to follow you if your bio indicates that you are into something that, quite frankly, I could care less about. I don’t care about horse racing or bingo or how to sell dresses. My bio indicates what I am interested in, and unless I know you or somehow find you interesting, I’m not going to bother following you if your Twitter account will be dominated by subjects I find exceptionally boring or inappropriate. What about you? What reasons do you have for not following people on Twitter? Let me know in the comments, and if you like this post, consider stumbling or digging it. Thanks!

World in the Satin Bag

1000th Post Massive Giveaway

In celebration of my 1,000th post here at WISB, I’ve decided to host a huge giveaway to all my current and future readers. Special thanks to SQT for offering up a few books she has in her pile for this giveaway. I’m giving away four different prizes, all of them books or comics. They are as follows (click the Read More to see the whole post): Prize #1 (Comics/Graphic Novels)Welcome to the Jungle (The Dresden Files graphic novel) by Jim Butcher and illustrated by Ardian Syaf.Undead Evil (special edition) from Asylum PressWarlash: Dark Noir from Asylum PressWarlash: Zombie Mutant Genesis from Asylum PressDTOX (special biohazard edition) by Frank Forte and Nenad Cucunja (from Asylum Press)Prize #2 (Novels)Low Man by T. J. VargoArthas: Rise of the Lich King (World of Warcraft) by Christie GoldenPrize #3 (Novels)Where Angels Fear (short story collection) by Ken RandInto This Mind by Lisa NevinLow Man by T. J. VargoPrize #4 (Novels from SQT)The Devil’s Eye by Jack McDevittThe Princep’s Fury by Jim Butcher Here’s how to enter (open to US Residents only, unless you can pitch in for international shipping; open to everyone except myself, because that would be ridiculous): Leave a comment or email me at arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com saying one thing you like about WISB and one thing you dislike or think could use work (criticism if you will). No, it need not be elaborate. You can say “I like green” if you want. I don’t care what’s said, so long as you say it. Please provide an email so I can contact you (either in your profile or in the comment). For additional entries, and there are many, you may do any of the following (put them all in one post to make it easier to track, please)(options with *s by them are favored options by me, but by no means mandatory): **Subscribe to my blog using one of the options in the upper left. If you are already subscribed, let me know in your comment and through which method and you will still get an extra entry — +1 Entries **Blog about this giveaway and leave the link here — +1 Entries Tweet this giveaway on twitter with @shaunduke and a link to this post and leave a link to it here — +1 Entries **Stumble and review this giveaway and let me know where (your stumble name, etc.) — +1 Entries Stumble and review any other significant post on WISB (not my rejection posts, but my actual post posts) and let me know where (your stumble name, etc.) — +1 Entries per Stumble (let me know where they all are if you do more than one; maximum of +5, because otherwise you could get +500 and that’s ridiculous) Become a fan of the Facebook Page for WISB (let me know who you are in your comment) — +1 Entries (if you are already a fan, let me know too and you will get +1 anyway) Follow me on Twitter and tell me who you are (if you’re already following me, let me know who you are and you’ll still get the +1) — +1 Entries **Leave a comment on this page letting the artist know what you think about his project to turn The World in the Satin Bag (my blog novel) into a graphic novel (more than just a sentence, please) — +2 Entries **Write a review of my blog on its Kindle page (more than just a sentence, please) — +5 Entries Buy any one item from the YWO Zazzle Store (lots of shirts and other fun things there; let me know what you bought) — +20 Entries And that’s it. There are a heck of a lot of ways to improve your chances of winning (most of them really easy, actually). Hopefully it’s not too overwhelming. Giveaway will be open until June 11th. Four winners will be chosen on the 12th using a random number generator.

World in the Satin Bag

Alternate History: Science Fiction or Something Else?

Tor.com’s recent post got me thinking about the problem that is alternate history. As highlighted by Tor, the opinions on alternate history seem to be relatively split down the middle: some believe it is science fiction and others do not, except in certain scenarios. I think I’ve voiced my opinions on this before, but never in a post dedicated to the topic. I have issues with considering alternate history as science fiction. I probably fit into that second camp that considers the genre largely something else, except in those occasions when someone from a future point is actively participating in the altering of history (Back to the Future, for example). The problem seems to be one of definition. I consider science fiction to largely be future oriented, in some capacity, with a heavy focus on some aspect of scientific discourse, whether accurate or otherwise. Thus, works like 1984 and Star Wars can be held within the science fiction genre (where they are then split into different subgenres for the purposes of differentiation). Science fiction, for me, must always consider the impacts of the present (or even the past) on a future point, even if that future point is tomorrow, rather than one hundred years from now. With that in mind, how can one possibly fit alternate history into the science fiction genre? It’s not about the future, it does not at all reflect upon the present, and it is not, as a genre, concerned with scientific subjects (from sociology to politics to physics)–though such subjects may play a part in certain tales. Alternate history tends to ask “What if this did or didn’t happen?” while science fiction tends to ask “What if this happened?” There is a disconnect there between what I consider to be the under-riding question. Science fiction never asks us to think about what didn’t happen; it is an active, progress-based genre (whether for good or for bad). But what do we do with alternate history if we can’t place it in science fiction? Wouldn’t it be fare to give it its own category? The generally accepted genre classification takes speculative fiction as the main genre, with science fiction and fantasy underneath as subcategories–sometimes horror gets put in there too. Why must we stick everything within those two subcategories? It seems somewhat absurd that everyone must either be fantasy or science fiction, and not something else–except where legitimate crossover is concerned, such as a science fiction horror, or a science fantasy, etc. Couldn’t we take the easy road and introduce a category specific to alternate history? As a genre, alternate history is neither science fiction, nor fantasy, but it is speculative. Perhaps that’s the best thing to do with it. What do you think? Do you consider alternate history as science fiction? Why or why not? Let me know in the comments!

World in the Satin Bag

Reader Question: When to Think About Endings

GothixHalo recently asked: When you are writing is it better to have the ending already worked out or to have it work itself out during the process? There’s no proper way to answer this question. How you write endings is entirely up to you based on what works best. Some writers have them worked out beforehand, and others like to leave things open, if not a little mysterious. I’m one of the latter and it would be foolish of me to tell you to write the way I do if it will not help you. A lot of writing tips tend to have an issue of presuming that everyone should write the same way, when in reality we all should write in a manner that works best for us as individuals. With that in mind, however, I can talk about my process for endings in hopes that will be of some use to someone. I intentionally avoid planning endings in anything I write, at least not in the beginning. Clearly I have to have some sense of where I’m going, but the more vague I can keep the final moments of the story, the more interesting the story is to me. I have an issue with losing interest in stories that I already know the end to. A part of me wonders what the point is in finishing a story that I already know the end to. Since the writing process is largely about me, and not anyone else, this makes sense, but I imagine it will lose that clarity when I get published and develop fans (and if they are at all as rabid as George R. R. Martin’s fans, then I’m in for it). Endings are, for me, both the most important and least important elements of stories. On the one hand, the ending is, well, the ending, and without it the story never concludes, never fulfills its metaphysical contract with the reader, the writer, or the characters. On the other hand, endings are less important than the other factors that make a story, such as the characters themselves, or the imagery. Endings can make or break a story, but they don’t always have to. An ambiguous ending is not necessarily a bad one, and in some cases the more ambiguous the ending, the better. This all depends on personal preference, though, and I find that I enjoy certain kinds of endings more than others (I prefer incomplete or less-than-happy endings). There’s no easy answer to this question. What one should do is try it both ways. Try planning the ending ahead of time and see if that works out for you. Then try it the other way and see what happens. It would be wrong of me to say that you have to do it one way and not another. Nobody, even a published writer (unlike myself), has the authority to tell you how you should write. Writers may give you advice and may suggest to you things that have worked for them, but what they say should always be taken with the understanding that what works for them may not work for you. People fiddle with “conventions” all the time, and there’s nothing wrong with that. What about all of you? Any thoughts? ——————————– And that concludes this week’s Reader Question. If you have a question, feel free to let me know in the comments, send it via a tweet to @shaunduke, or email it to me at arconna[at]yahoo[dot]com. If you liked this post, please consider stumbling it, bookmarking it, or whatever.

Scroll to Top