World in the Satin Bag

What do people think we’re listening to?

I was riding the bus today and an elderly gentlemen gave me a look. You know, one of those looks of disapproval, sort of how folks must have looked at teenagers in the 80s who had 80s hair or how people still look at folks with mohawks or weird piercings. He was giving me this look because I had my little ear-bud things for my mp3 player in their proper place and he must have been thinking I was listening to rap music or some such, because if he had actually known what I was listening to I doubt he would have given me that look.After being given this look it made me wonder whether iPods/mp3 players have started a new trend of disapproval just like 80s hair or mohawks or weird pierces did. Millions of us use our mp3 players, whatever brand they may be, on a daily basis. They’ve shaped the way our society (speaking in the U.S. here) in ways people probably never though possible. How many of us can honestly say we knew right from the start that the mp3 would replace the CD? It has, even though they’re still making CDs (which poses some serious problems for the future of the music industry when the mp3 officially takes over and CD stores go out of business).Getting back to the point, do we hold any sort of bias towards iPod/etc. users? Do we automatically think, upon seeing some teenage kid or college-age man with headphones and an iPod, that such a person is only listening to music, and most specifically poppy musical garbage that hasn’t technically done anything to advance music as an art? Or maybe we think they’re listening to their indie bands, sucking up all their silly folk music about saving the planet and what not?For the record, I wasn’t listening to music. I was actually listening to a podcast interview with a fantasy author, and a good one at that. In fact, I listen to a lot of podcasts and audio interviews, and other such things (even listened to a few lectures on there). Sure, a lot of folks probably only listen to music, but that’s not all of us. Some of us even listen to music that older folks might think is quite acceptible (classical music, for example).What do you think? Do you have this sort of bias when you see people with ear buds? Do you think this is a common thing among people in general? Do people scoff at the iPod/mp3 player fad in the same way people once scoffed at rock music?

World in the Satin Bag

WISB: Looking For Blogger

I’m looking for someone who might be interested in offering regular commentary on my blog on sf/f and related topics, or posting interesting videos, etc. I don’t know what else to write about it, but if you’d like to write blog posts for WISB, leave a comment or send me an email. I’d like to keep the activity up here without killing myself during the school year and it might be a lot of fun to bring more folks in here so more things can get covered. So, interested? Let me know! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

Video Found: Large Hardon Rap

It’s been all over the interwebs as of late and I finally took a moment to listen/watch it…and I have something to say:At this point I don’t really care if the LHC blows up the world, because this video is the coolest video package of scientific geekdom since Bill Nye the Science Guy was rocking after school television. Launch away LHC folks. Launch away. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

Website Found: Michael Komarck

What is it?Michael Komarck is an artist you probably know, just not necessarily by name (he’s done the covers for books like The Summoner by Gail Z. Martin, Bitterwood by James Maxey, and more) and today’s website is his website (just click his name). Not much to say other than this is where you can find out about the artist. Why is it cool?Aside from the News section, you can also see a portfolio on his work, which includes cover art, interior art, and other art that he’s done, such as art for collectible card games and what. You can also buy prints (signed or unsigned) and contact the author directly. Beautiful artwork from a fantastic artist. Check it out! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

A Birthday Meme

I saw this interesting meme here and thought I should do it just for he heck of it. Here are the rules: Look up your birthday in Wikipedia. Pick 4 events, 3 births, 2 deaths, and 1 holiday. The resuls (for October 6th): Events 1600–Jacopi Peri’s Euridice, the earliest surviving opera, premieres in Florence, signifying the beginning of the Baroque Period. 1889–Thomas Eddison shows his first motion picture. 1987–Fiji becomes a republic. 1995–51 Pegasi was discovered to be the first major star apart from the Sun to have a planet (and extrasolar planet) orbiting around it. Births 1289–King Wenceslaus III of Bohemia 1773–King Louis-Phillipe of France 1950–David Brin (yay!) Deaths 1542–Thomas Wyatt, English Poet 1989–Bette Davis, American Actress Holidays U.S. – German-American Day observed since 1987 I got somewhat screwed on the holidays, but there were some interesting Births and Deaths and what not. So, anyone who wants to do this is more than welcome to. I’m sure someone has a better birthday than I do. Anywho!

World in the Satin Bag

The Terminator Movies: Why the robots lost…badly.

I’ve been watching the first and third Terminator films the last couple of days and something occurred to me as to why the robots–from the future, of course–always lose: they’re not very smart robots.Let’s face it, the robots of the future didn’t exactly choose the “calm” approach to getting things done. The first Terminator was a large, muscular Austrian with a trigger finger. Go figure. He can’t talk all that well–no offense Arnold, but sweet-talking isn’t really your forte–and he has a tremendous social deficiency. You’d think that robots who eventually take control of the Internet, the military, and everything else attached to some sort of digital component would have learned a little about what makes us tick. They’d have known that people don’t generally respond well to being shot at, chased, followed by creepy guys in leather jackets who have a constant look of anger and speak like the Grim Reaper if he were born in Eastern Europe or hit over the head with a large hammer. But they didn’t do this research or decided it didn’t matter for some reason.You see, the robots could have easily killed off Sarah Connor the first time around by taking a little time to program “fake” emotions into their robots. I know, they’re robots and are supposed to be emotionless. That’s sort of the point of the movies. But we’re talking about this in a different light, so get over it. They could have programmed their Terminators to be a little more, well, human, even just a smidge. By doing so they would have ended up with a robot that could at least blend, somewhat, into the human world and might actually weasel its way into Sarah Connor’s good graces. And then, with her back turned, all trusting and what not, it could have just snapped her neck and been done with it.But that didn’t happen.And then came Terminator 2, where the Austrian version gets reprogrammed by humans who don’t have the time to deal with implanting human qualities into it, considering their desperate situation and all, and the evil version is a suped up model that can turn to liquid and runs really fast–oh and has the handy ability to turn his hands into toothpicks and golf clubs. The robots were almost there this time around. Sure, the T-1000 has a trigger finger, almost no emotions, etc., but it does manage to express a little humanity at times, albeit in an attempt to get what it wants. But, it’s not nearly enough and in the end the T-1000 is just another monstrous robot bent on killing one of the Connors (this time John) and causing as much explosion-happy mayhem as humanly, I mean robotically possible. And, just like with the first Terminator (T-101 or some such), this approach draws far too much attention, and really, if you’re going to jump into the past to hunt down a kid, you probably should do it quietly so that not every cop within three-hundred miles knows what’s going on. Subtlety is the wave of the future. Wait…no it’s not.Finally came Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines. I’m intentionally ignoring the Sarah Connor Chronicles, mostly because I haven’t watched them and because the few episodes I have seen really didn’t do much for me at all (sorry, I think they suffer from “stuck in the middle” syndrome like the new Clone Wars movie does). T3 was, more or less, an attempt to expand upon the Terminator story without doing anything too outlandish and ridiculous in comparison to the first two films. It succeeded on that front, giving us lots of explosions, chase scenes, fights, and what not without overloading it with the big movie killer in Hollywood today: excessive CG. Sure, there was a lot of CG in T3, but they seemed to avoid designing scenes that would rely entirely upon CG in exchange for a bit of realism (George Lucas, you should be paying attention here). In T3 we have Austrian Terminator being reprogrammed yet again by humans–human qualities missing, obviously–and sent back in time to protect John Connor and Kate Brewster–who apparently is Connor’s future wife. The robots, however, send back the T-X, and I’m going to use John Connor’s words to describe her: “She’s an anti-terminator…terminator.” She’s supposed to be an extremely advanced Terminator model, but she does come with limitations–she can’t turn into liquid like the T-1000, though she can change her appearance, and she can’t turn her arms into golf clubs. Sure, she’s superior to the T-101, or whatever model you want to call Arnold’s Terminator, but she’s not nearly as terrifying as the T-1000–mostly cause she’s a pretty woman and the T-1000 was that slightly creepy guy who later worked on X-Files. Having said all this, though, we find that despite T-X’s ability to control digital networks–such as the computer systems in our newfangled cars and what not–and her seemingly limitless physical capabilities–like punching through a car seat and a man’s chest all at once or simply walking away after being bitch-slapped by a rocket propelled grenade–she falls prey to exactly what made the first and second Terminators failures: she has absolutely no concept of what it is to be human. Well, I should say “it”, but because it’s a woman most of the time I’ll just say she. In the end, it is the original Terminator’s ability to have some semblance of humanity that leads to the success of humanity (which is sort of a strange type of success, since the robots succeed in starting the war anyway, but don’t worry, cause John Connor and Kate Brewster live, and Connor turns into a scarred badass that eats Terminators for breakfast and probably has his face on a Wheaties box at some point, or the future equivalent–Termies perhaps?).You see, after three attempts (more if you want to include the Sarah Connor stuff), you’d think they would have learned that creating robots that are incapable of blending into human

Scroll to Top