SF/F Commentary

#WorldSFTour Fundraiser Updatery: Free Reads and Moving Forward

First things first, I would like to thank everyone who has donated to this adventure so far.  It means a lot to have the support of folks following me around on the Internet.  So, thanks! If you haven’t supported the fundraiser yet, please consider doing so.  I really want to bring my podcast and the World SF Tour to Worldcon this year, in no small part because it will help me expand the project ten fold.  I won’t lie:  Worldcon will be a lot of fun.  But it will also be about contributing to this field, which means a lot to me. Now for the updates: Not too long ago, the fundraiser reached the 1st Milestone, which meant one of the perks activated.  The 1st Milestone Perk involved an entry in the Encyclopedia Confictura, a fun little alternate history thing I’ve done for giggles.  This time, I let a donor pick the topic, which ended up being the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. That perk is now live.  It’s listed under C in this magic Google Doc of other examples!  I had a blast writing it, and folks seem to be enjoying it thus far. The 2nd Milestone Perk also activated, which involves Paul Weimer writing a “Mining the Asteroid” column on a classic work of sf/f.  Everything for this fundraiser is donor selected, so a lucky individual selected The Anubis Gates by Tim Powers.  Paul’s post isn’t live yet, but it will be next week. 🙂 I’ve registered for Worldcon.  So, yeah.  At this point, I’m trying to raise travel expenses, which is the largest bulk of the cost (somewhere between $1500 and $1700). We’re now $232 (or thereabouts) from the 3rd Milestone.  For anyone who follows The Skiffy and Fanty Show, you’ll know that we do two film-related subcasts:  Torture Cinema and Shoot the WISB.  The 3rd Milestone Perk will allow a lucky donor to pick someone for one of those subcasts.  That could really turn out to be hilarious. Oh, and if someone picks Waterworld, I’m sure Jen Zink will be in that episode…and she will defend it with her life! And that’s about it.  If you’ve got a little spare cash, please consider helping out.  Even $5 goes a long way. Anywhoodles!

SF/F Commentary

Another Week of Joy Commences Today

I’ve done this before.  Last night, I declared Friday the beginning of another Week of Joy, in which I will only discuss or talk about happy things, like books, movies, spaceships, magic wizard monkeys, and anything that should be, in principle, producers of happiness. You are free to join me in whatever way appeals to you.

SF/F Commentary

Fishing (or Publishing); Whatever

Person One:  There is only one way to fish.  Fly fishing.  Obviously.  You would be a fool to try anything else. Person Two:  Nu-uh.  Angling is the only valid method, sir.  I have clearly done better than you via this method, so you really don’t know what you’re talking about. Person Three:  Oh yeah?  Well I know better than both of you.  Netting is clearly the best method, because you can catch more fish at the same time, and that means you can be as fat and pompous as you like…I mean, you can eat lots. Person Four:  You’re all wrong, and utterly stupid for not realizing that the best method is clearly spearfishing, which has the ability of bringing you closer to the medium of the fish.  Without the spear, we would not be fisherman. Person Five:  Bullshit.  You’re all morons.  Hand gathering is truly getting “into the fish.”  This is how the masters do it, and if you can’t be bothered to do it this way, then I’d rather piss in your cereal than let you anywhere near the fish. Person Six:  I kinda like all of them.  Sometimes it’s nice to have all these different ways to do things. Persons One through Five:  FUUUUUUUUUUUUU SHUT UP YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU DIE DIE DIE GGRRRRRAAAAAAA! The traditional vs. indie vs. self-publishing debate in a nutshell.  Involving fish.  As metaphors.  The end. For the record:  I don’t know anything about fishing, except that there are lures and things.  And that you catch fish.  And then eat them.  I want fish…

SF/F Commentary

How to Destroy the SFWA…err, no, I’m not going to talk about that after all

This post began as a parody or a satire.  Whatever it began as, it was a scathing critique of someone else whose post I’m not going to link to because I just don’t see a point in directly addressing anything said there or using my website as a link vehicle for what amounts to “people screaming about things they don’t understand.”  Phew.  Big sentence. So, I’ve come to this point where I either shrug, shake my head, and walk away to other things, or I write parodies/satires because I don’t want to repeat myself.  I’m going with the first route (except the walking away part). The SFWA nonsense shouldn’t be so nonsensical.  It shouldn’t be this difficult for some people to articulate a position that doesn’t make them look like assholes.  It shouldn’t be this difficult for those same people to understand what some people are saying.  It shouldn’t be this difficult for those same people to acknowledge that their worldview isn’t the only one or that it shouldn’t be just because it makes them comfortable.  It shouldn’t be this difficult for those same people to realize they’re arguing over a straw man and to start actually addressing what really bothers them, or to understand that gender matters, race matters, that our field is not perfect, that there are real structural problems here, that how people feel matters even if you don’t understand it because you’re not like them, that the world and its sf/f traditions matter, that how you represent others in a professional venue matters… It shouldn’t be this difficult. But it is.  And it’s incredibly frustrating to see name after name after name argue “1st Amendment” this or “political correctness” that.  To see them argue about things that aren’t happening, using definitions of words that make no sense (apparently “no politics” and “professionalism” means “say whatever you want in a professional venue without repercussions” — who knew?).  To see other people explain why the views of this group is skewed by straw man arguments and misunderstanding, only to get ignored because…reasons?  To see perfectly intelligent people refuse to acknowledge that gender and sexuality matter, and that giving up something like a pronoun really doesn’t cost any individual person anything worth hanging onto, or to see them hypocritically argue that the SFWA shouldn’t have anything to do with gender/sexuality/etc. while supporting inappropriate behavior from a while male author or two in a professional venue.  To see a female author get pissed on by someone in a position of authority because she didn’t dress conservative enough to qualify as a “feminist” (another redefined term). To see discussions of diversity dismissed as “political correctness,” which roughly translated means, “I used to be able to say offensive things to these people, but now I’m unhappy because I can’t without getting called out for it.”  To see a member of the community write a mini-manifesto on how to fix the SFWA, when really it would completely destroy the organization’s ability to represent the interests of sf/f writers and prevent the organization from celebrating its diversity (of all sorts).  As if somehow this would make things better.  As if somehow the organization does nothing today, when it obviously does. To see the complete inability of certain people to have the basic level of respect for others, even insofar as it might mean letting those others be represented in a journal designed for their profession.  Not as a political game.  Not as a manifesto for something.  But as an acknowledgement that people like them exist and are writing books or movies or whatever, and that there are particularities to the field that are relevant to them. SF/F deserves better than this. And that’s all I’m going to say about that.

SF/F Commentary

Link of the Week: “Me, as a useful representative example” by Mary Robinette Kowal

If you want to know the background for all of this, start with this post (mine) and all the links listed there, then go here (The Daily Dot) and here (Silvia Moreno-Garcia).  These will provide you with the necessary details to really understand why Mary Robinette Kowal has become a target by…certain individuals. In short, her post provides an example of precisely the sort of treatment many women receive in the SF/F community and the publishing industry.  It’s worth reading.  It’s worth thinking about. That is all. (For the record:  Mary once donated an hour of her time to The Skiffy and Fanty Show — cause she’s awesome.)

Book Reviews

Book Review: Breach Zone by Myke Cole

(Note:  There are some minor details about the previous books in this review.  I don’t honestly think they’re that spoiler-y, but you’ve been warned.) I am deeply ashamed that I have not yet written a proper review of Myke Cole’s various works.  He’s been on my podcast three times, and I have yet to review a single thing.  Today, I am rectifying that mistake by discussing what I’d argue is his strongest novel to date — Shadow Ops:  Breach Zone (Ace:  January 2014). Breach Zone opens with an invasion:  Scylla, now free from her prison in FOB Frontier (a now-destroyed illegal military facility in a magical plane known as the Source)[1], has used her negramantic abilities to rip a massive hole between the Source and New York City.  Behind her:  an army of goblins, Gahe, and other monsters.  Her mission:  carve out a place for Latent people (magic wielders) within the United States and end the tyranny of humanity…at all costs.  In comes down to Harlequin, a veteran member of the Supernatural Operations Corps and an aeromancer, who must keep Scylla’s forces at bay while reconciling his past and his conflict with the current state of affairs in the United States, in which magic is heavily restricted and abused. The third in Cole’s Shadow Ops series, Breach Zone concludes the overarching narrative which has guided the previous books, Control Point (2011) and Fortress Frontier (2012):  the rising tension between those who have magic and a government which seeks to control it.  In the previous novels, Cole focused on characters in similar positions:  Oscar Britton’s magical awakening in Control Point and Alan Bookbinder’s similar awakening in Fortress Frontier.  Both novels revealed varying levels of abuse on the part of the U.S. government in service of (or in illegal contradiction with) the McGauer-Linden Act, which determines how magic may be used within the States. In Breach Zone, however, Cole takes us into the mind of Harlequin (a.k.a. Jan Thorsson), who has, in the previous books, taken the position of a soft antagonist to Britton and Bookbinder.  Instead of maintaining that antagonism, Cole gives us an in-depth look into his motivations:  notably, his belief in the rule of law and the democratic process for change.  In many respects, Breach Zone is a far more complex work than the previous books because the relationship between “the law” and “what is right” becomes increasingly more divisive, particularly for Harlequin, who struggles with his need to uphold his oaths of office (serving the country), his desire to protect the people, and the very real possibility that he will have to violate (again) some of his core codes in order to save NYC.  Cole teases out this narrative with deliberate slowness, marinating the conflict and tying the various threads together so what occurs in the end is a product of necessity rather than a simple “soldier defies orders and goes rogue” narrative. This depth is also apparent in the book’s structure, which moves back and forth between Harlequin’s desperation to save NYC and his former relationship with Scylla, the primary antagonist, who has remained in the sidelines throughout the series.  These chapters are perfectly placed to provide not only the psychological tension necessary to fully empathize with Harlequin and his ethical quandaries, but also to set the groundwork for the conclusion and its horrific qualities.  The interaction between these flashback chapters and the general narrative are perhaps the most fascinating part of the book, not least of all because it tempers the high-intensity action which controls most of the novel’s narration.  Without that counterbalance, I think Breach Zone would be a weaker novel, but with them, it becomes a work which turns the landscape gray rather than playing the easy route of good vs. evil.  Everyone in this book has a reason to do what they do, whether it is Harlequin, Scylla, the Selfer street gangs (magic users who have run from the law), and so on.  Rather than give us villains, we’re given a sea of people who have to balance what is objectively right against what is ethically sound; they are also people who are complex without being overbearing.  In a novel with this much action, that’s quite a feat. Breach Zone also includes chapters about Bookbinder, though I think these are there primarily as a gateway between Fortress Frontier, in which Bookbinder was the main character, and this final volume.  This is not dissimilar from the shift between Control Point and Fortress Frontier, so I think I’m justified and thinking this is a deliberate inclusion.  Though Bookbinder plays second fiddle to Harlequin here, I think it’s worth noting that his chapters demonstrate more fully the sort of man he has become after the events of the previous book; no longer the paper-pushing career military man, Bookbinder is clearly a veteran, capable and determined even in the face of overwhelming odds — an aspect of his character which had not truly been present when he first appeared in Fortress Frontier.  There are also, for the action-enthusiasts, plenty of Bookbinder vs. goblins moments, which Cole handles with a deft hand. I also appreciated Cole’s attempts to address the political landscape that would undoubtedly arise in a world suddenly beset with magic.  I particularly liked the wrangling Harlequin has to do and the way the novel positions politics and the military as two different worlds with their own rules.  From Harlequin’s perspective, the need for support is not a matter of debate; rather, it is an honest, military assessment of a violent situation.  For those in the political sphere, however, the need is one which, if met, comes with additional consequences, particularly given the climate in which this novel is set — FOB Frontier was an illegal facility, so it’s discovery at the end of Fortress Frontier meant huge ramifications for U.S. global policy.  As a military man, Cole certainly understands the frustration this conflict produces; its representation in this novel, as such, gives Breach Zone not only a

Scroll to Top