Well, here we are living in a world where we can barely get human beings to the moon and with NASA constantly canceling projects like network TV drops shows, the chances of sending people to Mars get worse and worse. But science fiction writers aren’t simply going to give up writing about faster-than-light spaceships because our current society seems to be in a bit of a rut–nothing truly monumental has happened in the last twenty years, at least nothing like the first moon landing.
Space travel, however, is rather complicated, depending on the sort of story you intend to write. If you write hard SF you may find yourself in a bind. Einstein–that unrelentingly intelligent bastard–basically makes faster-than-light travel impossible (theory of relativity and all). Yet there are so many different types of fictional, and real, methods of traveling in space. What methods are realistic and what methods are fantasy?

Fantasy

The Middle Ground (meaning ones that are plausible, but without any real, consistent evidence to support it)

Realistic

Each of these has a lot of variations. If you want to have a better idea of all the different methods that have been postulated by scientists and science fiction writers, go here. It’s a great little website.
Enjoy!

14 Responses

  1. Really interesting post. I’ve sometimes pondered the different types of space travel (mainly lightspeed, faster-than-light-speed (Star Wars), and wormholes (Stargate SG-1), but I didn’t really stop to think about them in this much detail. Thanks for this.

    You know too much about too many things 😛 which is good for a sci-fi writer, naturally.

  2. Well, I think the likelihood of anything even close to that coming out of Iran is slim to none. The funding required would be astronomical.
    And there’s also the fact that it’s really rather fantastical thinking. I doubt this kid has any idea what he’s talking about. One too many Star Trek bootlegs in his household.

  3. Nope, you haven’t provided any information published in any accredited location, and therefore, this is nothing but wild, unfounded speculation without scientific support. Until you provide a source from somewhere like Scientific American or some such legit, published form, this is nothing but fantasy. Not to mention, I sincerely doubt that anything like this would be coming out of Iran in any serious form given its political climate.

  4. There is an entity called University of New Mexico which I hope you’d agree with it. His latest paper was presented in a conference therein:

    http://www.unm.edu/~ISNPS/pdfs/2007finalprogram.pdf

    Also, there is an entity called the American Institute of Physics (AIP) which I hope you’d agree with it too. The mentioned paper was also published by it:

    http://proceedings.aip.org/vsearch/servlet/VerityServlet?KEY=APCPCS&smode=strresults&sort=chron&maxdisp=25&threshold=0&possible1zone=article&possible4=mansouryar&possible4zone=author&bool4=and&OUTLOG=NO&viewabs=APCPCS&key=DISPLAY&docID=1&page=1&chapter=0

    Also, his main paper has been cited by some authors dependent to the mainstream physics society in some peer-reviewed journals by now:

    http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep?c=GR-QC/0511086

    If you still do not believe in his work, just wait to watch a realized wormhole from the CNN breaking news reported from Iran. I understand you, some people only believe their eyes! BTW, what’s wrong with the political climate of Iran, related to this subject?!

  5. Well, the first link doesn’t do me much good because all it does is have the guy’s name on it. That doesn’t tell me anything other than he may or may not have been there…

    Now the second link gives me a summary, which is much more helpful. However, I don’t think Mohammad has any freaking clue how impossible it is currently for us to cultivate negative energy. Not to mention how much energy it would take for what he is proposing. We simply don’t have the means to do it. Supposedly they moved a photon. I say supposedly because the article doesn’t help me because it is simply a summary and I haven’t heard of that particular institute, or the last one either.

    The question I think worth asking here is, if this is such a revolutionary and amazing idea, why isn’t NASA jumping on it? Or why aren’t Scientific American, Astronomy Magazine, and similar venues attempting to cover this? That’s what concerns me and that’s why I will take this research with a grain of salt. It’s mostly wild thinking as far as I’m concerned. A technology like you are proposing that he has come up with would be so important, and if it were possible based on his research not only would NASA be interested–because it could potentially make travel vastly different.

    As for Iran, its oppressive regime and industrial focus on oil and nuclear power/weaponry make it very limited in scientific expansion. Countries like Japan and places in Europe are far better equipped for true scientific research. The Middle East has a huge problem with this. I’m not saying this because I’m American, because I recognize that the U.S. is extremely lax in its advancement of the sciences, as compared to 50 years ago, however, the Middle East is a collection of extremely oppressive governments who do nothing to stall organizations that seek to hurt the innocent. That being said, I have very apprehensive feelings about scientific research being done in places like Iran, where relations with the U.S. and the world are strained because of their government, and where civil liberties are remote, not to mention the distribution of wealth is extremely classist.

  6. 1. You can simply contact there to verify his presentation:

    http://www.unm.edu/~isnps/staif/2007/

    … just a call would be OK:

    University of New Mexico
    Institute for Space & Nuclear
    Power Studies
    Farris Engineering Center
    Room 239, MSC01-1120
    Albuquerque, NM 87131
    Phone: 505.277.0446
    Fax: 505.277.2814

    2. Do think he has a freaking clue! Below experts might give you a confirmation:

    1 ) F. Rahaman
    Dept. of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700 032, India
    E-Mail:farook_rahaman@yahoo.com

    2 ) M. Kalam
    Dept. of Phys. , Netaji Nagar College for Women, Regent Estate, Kolkata-700092, India.

    3) B. C. Bhui
    Dept. of Maths., Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata-700150, India.

    4) S. Chakraborty
    Dept. of Maths., Meghnad Saha Institute of Technology, Kolkata-700150, India.

    5) M. Sarker
    Dept. of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700 032, India.

    6) A. Ghosh
    Dept. of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700 032, India.

    7) B. Raychaudhuri
    Dept. of Phys. , Surya Sen Mahavidyalaya, Siliguri, West Bengal, India.

    8) John Brandenburg
    Florida Space Institute-University of Central Florida
    Kennedy Space Center, Florida, 32899, USA
    (321)-868-7331, jbranden@mail.ucf.edu

    9) David Goodwin
    U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, USA
    dave.goodwin@science.doe.gov

    10) Glen A. Robertson
    NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Gravi Atomic Reseach, Madison, Al, 35757
    265-694-7941, gravi_atomic@hotmail.com, Glen.A.Robertson@nasa.gov

    11) Paul. A. Murad
    US Department of Defense, Washington, DC & Vienna, Virginia 22182
    Ufoguypaul@yahoo.com

    12) Peter A. Kuhfittig
    Department of Mathematics, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202-3109, USA. kuhfitti@msoe.edu
    http://www.msoe.edu/campus/directory_individual.php?id=kuhfitti

    13) Ken D. Olum
    Institute of Cosmology, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155
    kdo@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu
    http://cosmos2.phy.tufts.edu/~kdo/Welcome.html

    14) Serguei Krasnikov Gennady.Krasnikov@pobox.spbu.ru

    15) Kamal Kanti Nandi
    Department of Mathematics, University of North Bengal, Siliguri, WB 734013 INDIA
    kamalnandi1952@yahoo.co.in

    16) Jack Sarfatti
    PhD of Physics from University of California, Riverside. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sarfatti

    17) Eric W. Davis
    Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. Research Physicist, 4030 W. Braker Ln., Ste. 300, AIAA Senior Member. ewdavis@earthtech.org

    18) Hal. E. Puthoff
    Inst. for Advanced Studies at Austin, 4030 W. Braker Ln., Ste. 300, Austin, TX 78759, USA. puthoff@aol.com

    3. Why not NASA? Financial problems:

    http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/overview.html

    Also, such innovations might get into the military & black projects first, then (=after years) to NASA.

    4. Why not famous magazines? You can suggest them! Also, revolutionary ideas take long times to be accepted universally. For example, Einstein published the Special Relativity at 1905 & General Relativity at 1915 at won the Nobel prize at 1921 mainly for discovery of the photoelectric effect. Do you see the differences among the mentioned years?

    5. Your remarks on Iran sound interesting. Anyway, due to the information I gave you, it does not seem impossible if such a technology would be realized therein soon. Therefore, I propose you to publish a post about it and state your comments more clearly. That would be awesome! 😉

  7. I’m not concerned that he never spoke there, I’m concerned that there is no transcript of his speech, which would be of more interest to me than the fact that he spoke at a college. Anyone with an idea can speak at a college.

    Is his research published anywhere other than the Internet? Meaning, a book, or a scientific journal, or something of that nature that explains in simplistic terms what he is proposing and what his research is showing? Anyone can get on the web with a radical idea…

  8. Just do an investigation by calling the UNM. Don’t hear me, hear them. BTW, concern to any interest you like! 😀

Leave a Reply to S.M.D.Cancel reply