October 2008

World in the Satin Bag

Top Ten Overrated Science Fiction Shows (Ever)

This list is primarily based on shows I’ve actually seen. So, if you’re mad that I didn’t include some crappy show you thought should be here instead of something that is actually here, I’m sorry. But please do mention shows you think are crappy so I don’t watch them. Here’s the list: Star Trek (any of them, especially DS9) (that covers five of my slots, by the way)I liked Star Trek, but never enough to watch it on a regular basis or to want to own the DVDs. Sorry, but the original Star Trek doesn’t do much for me and the others don’t either. I liked Next Generation a bit, but not too much, and Voyager was okay for a while. I absolutely despised DS9, though. I don’t know why anyone liked that show. It was the most boring show I’ve ever seen. The problem with Star Trek is it constantly repeated itself…over and over…and over. All of the shows were basically the same formula, with exception to DS9 and a couple oddball episodes in some of the various shows out there (I liked that episode of Enterprise where the Vulcan lady reminisces about her time on Earth in the 50s or something). All the Star Trek shows aren’t necessarily bad, but none of them are necessarily worth the acclaim they receive, even TNG. LostThis show really isn’t that good. It’s overly complicated despite it being nothing more than a glorified, serious version of Gilligan’s Island, and it’s mostly ridiculous and impossible to belief. The show asks way too much of its audience on the believability scale, and not just with the story, but with the characters too. It was an interesting concept in the first season and probably could have gone for a second without becoming tired, but it just went overboard. People who think this show is the greatest thing ever haven’t seen a lot of good TV shows. HeroesAnother show that gets glorified–less now than in the past–and doesn’t deserve such glory. There are far too many characters to care about, the plot is mostly stupid, the evil characters are sort of boring, and the show is a big confusing. I tried watching the first season and I just lost interest. X-men is better. Doctor WhoI get British humor, but I don’t find this show to be all that. It’s okay, but it’s not exactly the greatest thing ever. I was entertained when I watched a few episodes some time back, but it was never good enough to turn me into a raging fanboy. SmallvilleIt’s not the worst show ever, so it likely won’t end up on my “worst” list, but here’s my problem with Smallville: why the hell do I care? Seriously. This is like watching the prequel Star Wars movies, only fifty times as long and not as good. I already know what happens. We saw the movies. Smallville has little to actually offer us except plot lines that won’t go anywhere or random expansions on the overall story that will most likely be forgotten ten years after the show ends. Yeah, there are hot chicks in this show, but hot chicks don’t make a show. A story worth caring about does. And I really don’t care about young Superman. At least with Young Indiana Jones the stories had somewhere to go… Aeon FluxI saw this show when it first aired. Not all that great. Kind of annoying, actually. Interesting story and all, but there’s a reason why most people don’t care about it. It’s a niche show, and I don’t think it’s a particularly good niche show. The movie version also blew major chunks, almost as bad as any binge-drinking party at Chico State. This is just one of those supposed “cult classics” that really isn’t all that great. It’s like saying that Blade Runner is one of the best films ever made: no, Blade Runner is one of the best visual films ever made, but the damn movie is boring as hell and anyone who says otherwise must be an incredibly boring person. I love Blade Runner, but it puts me to sleep. It’s just a monumental achievement in visuals, not in good story telling (it does have it’s moments). There you go. I know, some of you will be royally ticked off. So be it… Any overrated shows you’d like to mention?

World in the Satin Bag

London Lit Plus Goes Plus (Hopefully)

London Lit Plus, the supposed fringe of London’s book festival, is looking for a new managerial team. In fact, a new team full stop. Apparently they want someone who can take it to the next level, since the current team are no longer able to do so. If you’re interested in the gig, check out here.

World in the Satin Bag

METAtropolis: Free Download

For those that don’t know what METAtropolis is, I’ll give you the official description: Welcome to a world where big cities are dying, dead – or transformed into technological megastructures. Where once-thriving suburbs are now treacherous Wilds. Where those who live for technology battle those who would die rather than embrace it. It is a world of zero-footprint cities, virtual nations, and armed camps of eco-survivalists. Welcome to the dawn of uncivilization. METAtropolis is an intelligent and stunning creation of five of today’s cutting-edge science-fiction writers: 2008 Hugo Award winners John Scalzi and Elizabeth Bear; Campbell Award winner Jay Lake; plus fan favorites Tobias Buckell and Karl Schroeder. Together they set the ground rules and developed the parameters of this “shared universe”, then wrote five original novellas – all linked, but each a separate tale. Bringing this audiobook to life is a dream team of performers: Battlestar Galactica‘s Michael Hogan (“Saul Tigh”); Alessandro Juliani (“Felix Gaeta”); and Kandyse McClure (“Anastasia ‘Dee’ Dualla”); plus legendary audiobook narrators Scott Brick (Dune) and Stefan Rudnicki (Ender’s Game). John Scalzi, who served as Project Editor, introduces each story, offering insight into how the METAtropolis team created this unique project exclusively for digital audio. And apparently the good folks over at Audible are offering Jay Lake’s story “In the Forest of the Night” for free! Talk about a good deal, eh? You can find the free download here. Yay for free stuff! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

Well: 2 Years

Apparently WISB was two years old last month on the 3rd. Yeah. I’ve been around for 2 years on this blog. That’s incredibly, if you ask me. I’ve stuck with this for 2 years and I’m still going strong. Okay, pointless post, I know, but I just thought you all should know. Anywho!

World in the Satin Bag

Interview w/ Israel Del Rio

Israel Del Rio is the author of Honeycomb, a book I reviewed here some time ago. And now I have an interview with him. You can find more information about Israel at his website. Thanks again to Israel for his time and I hope you all enjoy it! Here goes: First, tell us a little about yourself: who you are, etc.I was born in Mexico City and have lived in the US working as a computer engineer and executive since 1983. Essentially empty nesters, my wife, Rita, and I reside in Atlanta. Our daughter, Tania lives in California with her husband, where they both work as graphic designers and comic book artists, our son Derek works as a software programmer, and our youngest son, Alex, has just started college. What got you interested in writing fiction in the first place? Who are some of your influences? Also, who are some of your favorite writers, past and present? Also, what are some of your favorite novels of all time? During my youth I went through a period of reading fiction, but I then took a hiatus when I began college and had to maintain a part time job as well as attend to other hobbies such as girls and playing gigs in a band. Once I allegedly matured, I resumed reading, but my focus then was mostly around physics and history. My interest in fiction was rekindled after I got married and was done with the honeymoon. I have always enjoyed the magical realism found in books by Gabriel Garcia Marquez, and I also like reading David Lodge, and more recently Jose Saramago. Among my favorite novels are “A Hundred Years of Solitude”; and Dostoyesky’s “Brothers Karamasov,” and “Crime & Punishment.” What are you currently reading, what have you just finished, and what do you plan to read next? I’ve just finished reading Supreme Courtship by Christopher Buckley. Actually this is the first novel written by this author that I have managed to finish. I didn’t particularly care for two of his previous novels, Boomsday and Florence of Arabia (although I did enjoy the movie based on his novel “Thank you for Smoking”). I am also attracted to the field of Artificial Intelligence, and so I do like to read books on linguistics. In this genre, I am particularly appreciative of the books by Steve Pinker. For my next book, I’m reading The Nine, and Musicophilia by Oliver Sacks. Do you plot first, then write, or write and come up with the plot as you go? What are some of your writing habits/rituals? First I outline the general idea in my mind, and then I fill in the plot details and twists as I go along with the writing. I tend to be more of a binge writer, writing in frantic bursts and then taking it easy for a day or two until I feel the impulse to once again reach for my keyboard. This style fits my temperament mainly because writing is not my primary occupation (although, I wish it were!). I have also learned that the first draft of a novel usually represents only about 5% of the total effort. I now subscribe to the dictum that “writing is re-writing.” Honeycomb is a novel revolving around a very interesting form of reincarnation. Can you talk a little about this and where you came up with the honeycomb? Actually, the idea emerged as a result of two memories of mine. In one, I recalled being given the choice to select my next life, and in the other memory I was told some details from my previous life. I felt these memories could be presented in book form and used as the anchor for the telling of an interesting story. Since the honeycomb deals with a religious idea–or at least one that is represented heavily in religion. How much did current and past religions–stories and all–influence your presentation of the honeycomb? I realize that the concept of reincarnation is one held by many eastern religions; however my idea was to approach the possibility of life after death, reincarnation, and our global connectedness more from a scientific perspective. Rather than following religious traditional view that God created the Universe, I think recent discoveries in physics and cosmology leave room for the opposite possibility, that it is God who is being created by the evolution of the Universe; and not the other way around. Continuing with religion, I think the one thing you’ve managed to do rather well with honeycomb is bring a little understanding of religion as a whole. It seems like you aren’t trying to paint a picture of any particular religion. True, there are elements that might be seen as part of religions that exist today, but you ground your “world” in the reality of inter-connectivity. Can you talk a little more about religion, not in how it influences your work, but in how it is woven into Honeycomb and perhaps the world around us, and how you are presenting it to the reader? Even though I was born into a Catholic family, I’ve never really subscribed to any particular religion. Respectfully to those who believe otherwise, I am not a big fan of religion and in particular I am especially turned off by those who use religion to espouse extremist worldviews. There seems to be this belief that God has to be connected to some form of religion. I don’t see the two as intertwined. If one defines religion as the observance of certain rituals and the belief in certain religious canons; whether codified in the form of books or chants or other traditional means, then I believe it is possible to believe in the possibility of God without the necessity of following any particular religion. One of the things I found really interesting about Honeycomb is how the narrative moves in a circle. Your main character–who remains a nameless spirit of sorts–begins where he ends up. How

World in the Satin Bag

Sometimes the Internet is Priceless

Finding an article about something you’re interested in: Worth $5 Finding a funny video that brings you back to your youth: Worth $50 Finding a Craigslist ad in Los Angeles that’s looking for a Sarah Palin look-a-like for an adult film, which specifically says “No anal required”: Priceless. There’s some things that fictional money and time can buy, for everything else, just go to Craigslist. If you don’t find that funny, then clearly we’re on two different wavelengths. Thanks to Zombified at YWO for pointing it out. This is definitely a welcome moment of hilarity. (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

Scroll to Top