September 2008

World in the Satin Bag

J. J. Abrams: Moron in Producer’s Clothing

From io9: Abrams talked a lot about why he thinks the time is right for a show about the horrors of science gone wrong. “Every day, every week, we hear about some potentially horrifying thing… Science is out of control.” No, what’s out of control is the overrated producer/creator that gave us the Lost, Cloverfield, and what will almost surely be a horribly overrated junker, Fringe. Let’s discuss for a moment, shall we?You wrote an adult version of Gilligan’s Island, which wasn’t very good and which proved to have no credibility when the fat guy on the show never lost any weight. Really? A guy that size goes on an extreme diet on a semi-deserted island and doesn’t lose a pound? I mean, come on, he had to lose at least a little weight. All that running around, climbing, and eating coconuts and dirt…I’m losing weight just talking about it. Not to mention the show took itself way too seriously, so much so that nothing happens in almost all the episodes, which puts me to sleep (sort of like Heroes, which lost me when it got all “evil government” on me…the X-men cartoon was better).Then you wrote Cloverfield, one of the worst science fiction movies I’ve seen in a long time, sporting the witty narration of a half-retarded guy named Chud, or Chug, or Chum, or some four-letter name for a mentally deficient college-aged guy who clearly took one too many hits in the head during football practice. That movie took all the horribly idiotic cliches of horror movies and disaster films, put them together, and did nothing all that new or original with it. Bravo.Finally, you’re giving us Fringe, which sounded cool to me for a while, until that glorious quote above where you tried to make it sound like science is this big scary evil thing that’s out of control. Excuse me? This is why people like Abrams shouldn’t be allowed to write about things they don’t know anything about. Science isn’t out of control. In fact, it’s strictly controlled by rules, regulations, etc. We’re not producing evil super-humans who go around assassinating people in their sleep, never leaving a trace, and being capable of scaling 20-storey buildings in a single leap. We don’t have super-viruses controlled by the government to keep the masses in check, or nasty robot bugs that go around with little lasers, shooting people that make a vague threat against the government. See, that would be out of control…having those things. But we don’t. Nope, science is cool. Just remember that the next time you get a shot. Science gave us the means to fabricate our own immunities. And that’s all I have to say about this…

World in the Satin Bag

2081: New Kurt Vonnegut Movie?

I discovered this site/trailer for a new movie called 2081 that is supposed to be based on a short story by Kurt Vonnegut. It looks really fascinating and I’m curious if anyone knows about the project, such as when it’s due in theaters or online or wherever. Check it out for yourself if you haven’t heard about it. It’s dystopian science fiction and it’s truly fascinating. Anywho! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

Video Found: Read a Book (Dirty Version)

Okay, first things first: this video has bad language. DO NOT listen if you are easily offended by cursewords or other such bad words. Seriously. I don’t want to hear that you got offended by my posting this here. Consider yourself warned. This is the only good thing to have come out of modern rap music and probably the first time ever that a rap song has actually sent a good message. If your kids must listen to rap, have them listen to this (it’s a little repetitive, but it makes perfect sense and I would really like to see this reworked so it wasn’t just the chorus): (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

World in the Satin Bag

Switching Gears?

I have been putting a lot of thought into my writing as of late. I’ve already made one major gear shift in the direction of my writing, focusing on more fantasy shorts than science fiction shorts. The reason for that was brought to my attention by my girlfriend, who noted that a lot of my earlier science fiction stories were driven more by plot and my newer stories are driven more by ideas, which, with the way I write, doesn’t work. I tried to work around it, but I think my problem is I don’t have a lot of interesting stories to tell at the moment in SF (just ones I’ve already written). Since switching I’ve found myself far more open to new ideas with fantasy. This is not to say that SF is bad, just that my mind is a bit overloaded on SF. I’m pushing myself too much to write “good” SF and what is coming out isn’t necessarily the best of my best. My earlier stories had more adventure and conflict, and I need to try to tap back into that. After switching I started three promising fantasy shorts. One of them is finished (“The Gnomes of New Timberfax”) and needs editing, one is almost finished (“The Beautiful Are Not Far Away”) and one is started and on a semi-hold as I figure out where it’s going (“No Home For Underworld”). I’m very pleased with the gnome story and the second one, and will be more pleased with the last when I manage to finish it. Needless to say, I’m happy with this gear shift.But now I’m considering another shift and I don’t know if it’s a smart idea at all. I’ve been focusing so much on short stories and it made me wonder if perhaps I should try to finish my science fiction novel (The Lies of Venicia/The White). I’ve been letting the novel writing slide under some sort of preconceived notion that I need to break into the short market to make novel writing more of a reality. I’m fully aware that you don’t have to do what is considered the “traditional” route to be successful, but there’s something about being a short story writer and then a novelist that seems right. But then there’s that part of it that feels like perhaps I’m putting too much time into one side and not enough time developing the other. I’ve only written one complete novel (The World in the Satin Bag) and part of the sequel (The Spellweaver of Dern), and about a third of the science fiction novel. I have loads of other novel ideas I’ve set aside because they began as shorts and became longer works, and ultimately I am not ready to have five or six novels going all at once. That’s too much.So, I’m curious if perhaps I’m burning myself out on the short market and should really try to push the longer stories forward. Novels are…difficult, to say the least. They aren’t like short stories, not by a long shot. True, there are similarities, but there is infinitely more information in a novel than in a short story, because infodumping in a short story would be pretty much the kill point. But in a novel you can expand upon ideas and fully develop characters, giving them histories, futures, everything. I love both forms because of their differences.Thinking about all this has really put my writing into question, especially considering what I want to do with my life. I’ve recently begun searching for freelance work–anything really, so long as it is something I feel comfortable doing–as a means to hopefully jump start my career and get appropriate references (anyone with a job for me, feel free to send an email). With that in mind, I considered the fact that novels take a long time to get published, if they are publishable. Unlike short stories, which can go to a magazine and get accepted or rejected in a couple days, weeks, or months, novels can take many months, sometimes years with one editor. The longest I ever waited for a short story to be rejected/accepted was four months, and that’s unusually long. But some novel writers have waited upwards of a year, sometimes two. Do I really want to wait five or six years before I start hitting the novel market (assuming I have something worth writing about, or something that an editor might like enough to want to publish, and I hope I do)? True, it could take me years to get published in any format (even if I am good), but I also have to consider where I want to be in the next two years.I want to finish my BA and go on to graduate school for my MA and then PhD. I do want to teach, though that is more as a “job to do while I’m trying to jump start a writing career” thing (think of it this way: teaching is the job I’d like to do if I can’t be a full time writer). That’s a pretty good plan, in my opinion.So, here I am, wondering what to do, how to go about my writing, etc. What do you think? Am I putting to much effort into short stories? Or should I keep plugging away?

World in the Satin Bag

What do people think we’re listening to?

I was riding the bus today and an elderly gentlemen gave me a look. You know, one of those looks of disapproval, sort of how folks must have looked at teenagers in the 80s who had 80s hair or how people still look at folks with mohawks or weird piercings. He was giving me this look because I had my little ear-bud things for my mp3 player in their proper place and he must have been thinking I was listening to rap music or some such, because if he had actually known what I was listening to I doubt he would have given me that look.After being given this look it made me wonder whether iPods/mp3 players have started a new trend of disapproval just like 80s hair or mohawks or weird pierces did. Millions of us use our mp3 players, whatever brand they may be, on a daily basis. They’ve shaped the way our society (speaking in the U.S. here) in ways people probably never though possible. How many of us can honestly say we knew right from the start that the mp3 would replace the CD? It has, even though they’re still making CDs (which poses some serious problems for the future of the music industry when the mp3 officially takes over and CD stores go out of business).Getting back to the point, do we hold any sort of bias towards iPod/etc. users? Do we automatically think, upon seeing some teenage kid or college-age man with headphones and an iPod, that such a person is only listening to music, and most specifically poppy musical garbage that hasn’t technically done anything to advance music as an art? Or maybe we think they’re listening to their indie bands, sucking up all their silly folk music about saving the planet and what not?For the record, I wasn’t listening to music. I was actually listening to a podcast interview with a fantasy author, and a good one at that. In fact, I listen to a lot of podcasts and audio interviews, and other such things (even listened to a few lectures on there). Sure, a lot of folks probably only listen to music, but that’s not all of us. Some of us even listen to music that older folks might think is quite acceptible (classical music, for example).What do you think? Do you have this sort of bias when you see people with ear buds? Do you think this is a common thing among people in general? Do people scoff at the iPod/mp3 player fad in the same way people once scoffed at rock music?

World in the Satin Bag

WISB: Looking For Blogger

I’m looking for someone who might be interested in offering regular commentary on my blog on sf/f and related topics, or posting interesting videos, etc. I don’t know what else to write about it, but if you’d like to write blog posts for WISB, leave a comment or send me an email. I’d like to keep the activity up here without killing myself during the school year and it might be a lot of fun to bring more folks in here so more things can get covered. So, interested? Let me know! (Don’t click the read more, there isn’t any more after this!)

Scroll to Top